Why it is morally licit to attend Holy Mass celebrated by the Society of Saint Pius X

LifeSite News ^ | October 28, 2022 | Maike Hickson

[ebb tide]

Your problems are solved.

I have never had problems with either the FSSP or the SSPX.

I do have a big problem with that bogus ordo that you claim is a "Safe Place".

And when I travel and no FSSP Mass is offered, I'll seek out an SPPX Mass rather than suffer a bogus ordo.

So to repeat, I have no problems with the SSPX but I do with the mason, Bugnini's, "new ordo".

[Captain Walker]

One of the stipulations for attending a licit and valid TLM is that we accept the validity of the NO.

You going to a TLM, even searching out one offered illicitly, would suggest a breach of the agreement.

I think you're missing the point completely.

(If you couldn't find an SSPX chapel, would you go to one of their breakaway sects like the SSPV or the SSPX Strict Observance?)

Maybe you could start your own and call it the Super Duper SSPX...

[ebb tide]

(If you couldn't find an SSPX chapel, would you go to one of their breakaway sects like the SSPV or the SSPX Strict Observance?)

Now you're just acting puerile because you don't have leg to stand on. The SSPX Masses are no less valid than the FSSP Masses.

I never denied the validity of the bogus ordo but I also avoid as a near occasion of sin. I actually suffered one last night on All Saints Day; it was a very painful experience.

You going to a TLM, even searching out one offered illicitly, would suggest a breach of the agreement.

What damn agreement? The agreement made with some apostate pope who has practically outlawed the TLM?

The same dictator pope who sold out the persecuted Catholics in Red China.

An agreement with a man who is doing is best to destroy the Catholic Church?

Sorry, Cap'n, but I don't honor any pacts with the devil.

[Captain Walker]

Nw you're deflecting.

Would you attend Mass at one of the SSPX breakaway groups?

[ebb tide]

Would you attend Mass at one of the SSPX breakaway groups?

Both you are I already are: the FSSP.

So put a sock in it, already.

I'm neither a schismatic nor a sedevacantist and would never attend a "service" by either cult.

[ebb tide]

Nw you're deflecting.

Exactly what is this damn "agreement" you are referring to?

Have you heard of the Catholic persecuted priests and bishops in China suffering due to a secret "agreement" between a dictator pope and fellow red dictator?

[ebb tide]

The Church is the safest place we could be; a schismatic safe space is a deceptive fraud.

The SSPX is not schismatic.

Stop blowing smoke.

[Captain Walker]

You're not even kidding yourself.

In the present circumstances I wish especially to make an appeal both solemn and heartfelt, paternal and fraternal, to all those who until now have been linked in various ways to the movement of Archbishop Lefebvre, that they may fulfil the grave duty of remaining united to the Vicar of Christ in the unity of the Catholic Church, and of ceasing their support in any way for that movement. Everyone should be aware that formal adherence to the schism is a grave offence against God and carries the penalty of excommunication decreed by the Church's law.(8)

https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/motu_proprio/documents/hf_jp-ii_motu-proprio_02071988_ecclesia-dei.html

[ebb tide]

Oh, great! Now you’re quoting the Koran-kisser who invoked St. John the Baptist to protect Islam.

The same man who kept promising Archbishop Lefebvre a date to consecrate a bishop(s) but never kept those promises.

The same man who started the heretical Assisi group hugs where Hindus placed a statue of Buddha on top of a tabernacle with the Blessed Sacrament inside.

Try again.