Federal Judge: Constitution May Still Protect Abortion, Despite Dobbs

Catholic News Agency ^ | 2/9/23 | Tyler Arnold

[EvilCapitalist]

The Constitution says nothing about abortion.

[apillar]

Supreme Court smackdown v2.0 incoming...

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

So, in other words, women are enslaved by their unborn babies? Is that what this black-robed dorkwad is saying?

[itsahoot]

Supreme Court smackdown v2.0 incoming...

Prepare to be disappointed.

[Arcadian Empire]

“The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives,” the court stated in a syllabus included with its lengthy Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision.

The decision said “The Constitution does not confer a right to an abortion”.

The decision did not just say that one particular amendment didn’t confer a right to an abortion but that maybe other amendments did as this article ludicrously claims.

Alito, bless him, was unambiguously clear.

[nicollo]

That’s exactly what the Pharisees are saying.

[DesertRhino]

The whores and baby choppers are going down swinging, aren’t they? Now this idiot thinks she can overrule the Supreme Court.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Not the 14th Amendment. Not the 13th Amendment.

How about the Juneteenth Amendment?

[Trumpisourlastchance]

What an utter farce. Slavery and abortion have no more connection than a mole rat and a Boeing 747.

[Paladin2]

Penumbras of Umbras?

Fantasy.

[Repeal The 17th]

The 13th Amendment?
I’m just not seeing it.

---

AMENDMENT XIII
Passed by Congress January 31, 1865.
Ratified December 6, 1865.
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as a punishment for crime
whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,
shall exist within the United States,
or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article
by appropriate legislation.

---

Note: A portion of Article IV, section 2, of the Constitution
was superseded by the 13th amendment.

I intentionally did not reply to the marshmallow,
because he, she, or it never replies to any post,
he, she, or it only posts articles with no comment.

[ebb tide]

The judge is a woman who received her B.A. and J.D. from the Catholic University of America, post VCII.

No surprise.

[heartwood]

If pregnancy from voluntary intercourse is involuntary servitude, so is court-ordered child support.

[reg45]

The Thirteen Amendment also prohibits treating other human beings as property that can be disposed of at will. The abortion lobby considers unborn children to be the property of the egg-provider (formerly known as the mother) that can be disposed of at the will of the egg-provider.

[RetiredTexasVet]

Probably didn’t pass a lot of law courses, just played a minority card.

[Rowdyone]

So anyone has the right to commit murder and it’s protected under the 14th Amendment’s privacy protections...got it.

[Bob434]

[[The whores and baby choppers are going down swinging, aren’t they?]]

It is just mind blowing how viciously they are fighting to keep their ‘right’ to murder their unborn offspring- Truly demonic

[TBP]

Quite the contrary. If anything, Amendments 5 and 14 prohibit it.

[Republican Wildcat]

a federal judge is claiming that the 13th Amendment, which was ratified to abolish slavery, might establish a constitutional right to have an abortion.

Clueless and ridiculous for many reasons, not to mention the fact that the logic given for abortion on demand is quite similar to those used to justify slavery. "They aren't really human"