Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bible Code website links Saddam to WTC attack
http://www.biblecodedigest.com/page.php/51 ^ | 9/19/2001 | Ted

Posted on 09/19/2001 5:15:08 AM PDT by Ted

If you've not heard of the Bible code books/studies it is some interesting stuff. It's far more important to base one's faith on the Scriptures as written in plain text, IMO. Take it or leave it, click on the link above. I thought it worthwhile to read through once.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2001 5:15:09 AM PDT by Ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ted
The Bible Codes are a time machine that can be used to decipher past events. They can't be used to foretell the future since it would deprive man of free will.
2 posted on 09/19/2001 5:16:45 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I did not say it foretells the future...

Folks, I have an mtg I have to run to, and won't be able to reply to anything. This really was a FWIW post, take it or leave it.

Regards.

3 posted on 09/19/2001 5:22:30 AM PDT by Ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Did you read the book "The Bible Code"? Fascinating stuff. The author, while researching and writing it, makes a pretty good case against your argument, I think.
4 posted on 09/19/2001 5:23:56 AM PDT by Gurn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Bible Codes are pure unadulterated BS.

You can get the same results using the same methods on the text of War and Peace or the Encyclopedia Britannica.

5 posted on 09/19/2001 5:25:16 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ted
It needs some clearing up for laymen like me. I don't know Hebrew.
6 posted on 09/19/2001 5:26:18 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted
Quick! Forward this to the State Department!
7 posted on 09/19/2001 5:26:40 AM PDT by BurkeanCyclist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Exactly. The so-called "Bible codes" are the wolf of pagan superstition wrapped in the sheep's clothing of Scripture.
8 posted on 09/19/2001 5:27:41 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The only fallacy with your position is Revelation...and the Old Testament prophecies. Foreknowledge doesn't deprive anyone of anything. Free will exists for people to make up their own mind about any/everything. I don't buy into the Bible Code...but, having read it I can see how the interest factor is there. I wouldn't claim to know the mind and heart of God when it comes to the ways He uses to communicate with mankind beyond the Scriptures and His own Holy Spirit convicting of sin and guiding Believers.
9 posted on 09/19/2001 5:38:43 AM PDT by borisbob69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Respectfully, I disagree. I've read a bit on the subject, and am a believer in Scripture. There is also, though the Jewish students of the code play this down, a name that occurs over and over (in code) in the Messianic prophecies of the old testament: Yesu.
10 posted on 09/19/2001 5:39:47 AM PDT by Gurn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ted
This is goofball stuff and reminds me of Tarot cards and numerology.

Notice they are selling a book and talk about subscriptions - somebody is making money off this.

The value of the Bible and other religious writings is in pondering the wisdom of the text, not matching up letters to look for clues.

Easier to read news releases - many of them say Iraq may have involvement with the bombings.

11 posted on 09/19/2001 5:43:34 AM PDT by Old Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I happen to believe the Codes are accurate. So far no one's been able to debunk them. They certainly strengthen the traditional view that G-d was the author of the entire Torah. If you look at that page examining the code in Ezekiel and the exact description of "Manhattan," "Saddam," "Bin Laden," "Arafat," "The explosion in the Towers," and "Pentagon" all in the original Hebrew you wonder how its possible for someone living 4,000 years ago to foresee the EXACT details of history as they were happen. No human being then alive could and not now which leaves only ONE conclusion. Atheists won't like it. The decoding of the passage with names and events so specific, its chilling to realize this is in a 4,000 year old plus document. What else does the Torah say about tomorrow we don't know yet but can only check up on after its happened? Like I just said what are the odds of any one being able to write accurate names, places and happenings thousands of years later down to the last second? THE DETAILS. And now thanks to the Torah we have the pieces of the puzzle falling into place and can apprehend the horror of what happened and who the players were who put it into motion. As vivid and real as today's news reports.
12 posted on 09/19/2001 5:44:45 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Here are two articles debunking the Bible Code.

One
Two

13 posted on 09/19/2001 5:46:02 AM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Er, no you can't. Course, you haven't bothered to read the "Bible Code" or you would know that. They have run INNUMERABLE "control" studies on "War and Peace," "Gone with the Wind," blah blah, and NEVER come up with anything remotely of the sophistication of the "Bible Code."
14 posted on 09/19/2001 5:49:53 AM PDT by LS (schweikart@erinet.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
They are always accurate AFTER an event.
15 posted on 09/19/2001 5:50:08 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I tried War and Peace, which returned "Mets Sweep '62 Series" and "Liston Knocks Out Clay."
16 posted on 09/19/2001 5:52:07 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You can accomplish the EXACT same result using any sufficiently large collection of letters, such as the collected postings on Free Republic, the text of War and Peace, or an encyclopedia.

Please note that the words of Scripture are the same words used in secular writing; the same consonant/vowel relationships and frequency counts still exist in Scripture as they do in ordinary writing. In short, you are looking at a group of letters and seeking individual words using arbitrary rules.

17 posted on 09/19/2001 5:52:21 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LS
That's because they changed the methodology for the "control" studies.
18 posted on 09/19/2001 5:54:42 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Interesting. I found "McVeigh," "Oklahoma," "bomb," and "Murrah" in War and Peace on the Skeptical Inquirer website.
19 posted on 09/19/2001 5:56:20 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: michaelt
Breaking
News
Code Skeptics' (Poohbah)
Arguments Trashed

Ever since the first Bible
codes were announced,
skeptics have been
saying, "Oh, well, you
can also find codes like
that in books like War
and Peace and Moby
Dick."

We took the time to
examine this notion and
the best example of it
that the skeptics have
been able to come up
with. The results of our
research have
completely blown away
their theory. Click here to see for yourself.


20 posted on 09/19/2001 6:01:20 AM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ted
John 18:20
Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world;
I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple,
whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have
I said nothing.

Mat 12:39
But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh
after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it,

21 posted on 09/19/2001 6:15:38 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: borisbob69
The only fallacy with your position is Revelation...and the Old Testament prophecies. Foreknowledge doesn't deprive anyone of anything. Free will exists for people to make up their own mind about any/everything. I don't buy into the Bible Code...but, having read it I can see how the interest factor is there. I wouldn't claim to know the mind and heart of God when it comes to the ways He uses to communicate with mankind beyond the Scriptures and His own Holy Spirit convicting of sin and guiding Believers.

I thought it was kind of interesting. And while reading your post I thought of something.

Perhaps the Bible code has a connection to Revelations? Or maybe other books too, I don't know.

Revelations 18 fits quite well to the present situation. It also fits with the Bible code.

Maybe the Bible code was noticed during translation, and the scribe took the Bible code and put it into Revelations.

Just a thought.

22 posted on 09/19/2001 6:16:19 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ted
Yeah, and God inspired Moby Dick! This is absolute nonsense. The Bible codes were discredited several years ago. Of course, believers are going to believe whatever they want regardless of the facts. If it makes them feel good, then so be it. But, then, that doesn't make them a whole lot better than liberals in that regard.
23 posted on 09/19/2001 6:27:21 AM PDT by VoodooEconomist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The Bible Codes are pure unadulterated BS.

AMEN!

24 posted on 09/19/2001 6:27:49 AM PDT by VoodooEconomist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
If you think Revelations 18 fits this situation, read Zephaniah 1:14-18:

Zep 1:14 ¶ The great day of the LORD is near, it is near, and hasteth greatly, even the voice of the day of the LORD: the mighty man shall cry there bitterly.

15 That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness,

16 A day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers.

17 And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the LORD: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung.

18 Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD'S wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of his jealousy: for he shall make even a speedy riddance of all them that dwell in the land.

25 posted on 09/19/2001 6:29:39 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I happen to believe the Codes are accurate. So far no one's been able to debunk them.

LOGIC 101 - the burden of proof is on the party making the assertion. Besides, the rules used to come up with the Bible Codes, produce all sorts of fascinating (prophetic?) stuff when applied so such things as Webster's Dictionary and Moby Dick. In other words, figures don't lie ... but liars figure. The reason Bible Codes and other such bunk are able to thrive is because there are enough credulous people to buy it (thanks government schools).

26 posted on 09/19/2001 6:33:32 AM PDT by VoodooEconomist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ted
The cult of Kabbalists (Bible "code" adherents) has been around a long time.

I recommend we read Scripture at face value....
The main things are the plain things... therein.

Mark Twain noted, "It is not the things in the Bible that I don't understand that frighten me.", inferring that God's forthright revelation of Himself, His decrees, and power to execute His judgments, in the affairs of time and history, as well as in matters of eternity should be enough to awaken the spirit of man.

It's not a rhyme (code), or a recipe.... or even a religion. It is a matter of one's personal relationship with God that will make all the difference in our life here and now... and in our hope for eternity.

"The precepts, principles, patterns.... the prophecies, prayers, and promises.... even the prose and the poetry... lead us to the Holy Person... who gives us the power to live according to His Word, and the living ultimate hope of eternal life."

The words of Peter, regarding Jesus Christ are recorded in Acts 4:12...
"Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved"

And the apostle Paul likewise encouraged faith in Christ in Philippians 2: 9-11...
"Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."

No code necessary... IMHO
Regards and Blessings to all,

27 posted on 09/19/2001 6:47:57 AM PDT by Wings-n-Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
They are always accurate AFTER an event.

This is what God says in scripture (about plainly written scripture) a number of times. "Haven't I told you?" "Didn't I say?"

I'm sure you wouldn't make that argument against the validity of the plainly written scriptures, Hank. The question to ask about the so-called Bible Code is not, "Did He?" but rather, "Could He?"

These coincident words were also there before the event, but nobody knew to look for them until AFTER the event. Assuming for a moment that God did put the coded messages in the Hebrew text, he didn't do it to forewarn, but to say after the fact, "I foreknew this way before it happened. I AM."

Anyone, and I strongly mean ANYONE, who says God COULDN'T do this Bible Coding is actually saying God isn't.

The other question, (Did He?) we can ask him when we're in his presence in eternity. Just like the issue of Speaking in Tongues, it's not mentioned in the scriptures as being a prerequisite for salvation, so we can safely put it on the shelf for now.

28 posted on 09/19/2001 6:59:13 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: all
Rev 22:18 - 19

For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things,
God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

And if any man shall take away from the words of the book
of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the
book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from]
the things which are written in this book.

29 posted on 09/19/2001 7:11:40 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Thanks for pointing that out!! It does fit! And very well.

18 Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD'S wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of his jealousy: for he shall make even a speedy riddance of all them that dwell in the land.

I find the above interesting. Jealousy. Yep, that about sums it up. Now, why would G-d be jealous? Because we are told in the OT that G-d is a jealous G-d and you will worship no one but Him. And so called Christians have placed Jesus on and equal footing with G-d!

Oh there will be a hew and a cry over that statement, but its true. Jesus was a prophet, he told us that himself. When asked about salvation, he always mentions following the Commandments. Paul refers to Jesus as a MAN approved of G-d, born 'of the seed' of David, 'according to the flesh'.

Idolatry.

Jesus was Jewish, he always followed Judaism, his followers followed Judaism. They NEVER changed. I have never been able to understand how some can call themselves a followers of Jesus, when they don't follow the religion of JESUS.

What about faith? Yes, you need faith. The faith OF Jesus, NOT faith IN Jesus.

FWIW

30 posted on 09/19/2001 7:42:15 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LS
ACtually, the Bible Code scholars were mistaken when they said it didn't work on other books. In fact, the methodology works for almost every book tested. The difference is the chosen key. If you run tests of hundreds, or even thousands, of keys, you eventually find one that seems to work.

The best test I saw was one that was run against the Bible and resulted in the message "Bible Code is a Fraud".

It's the old 1,000 monkey's with 1,000 typewriters thing. Technology just has made such an experiment possible.

31 posted on 09/19/2001 7:43:16 AM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
John 18:20
Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world;
I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple,
whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have
I said nothing.

"Mark 4:11-12 (Matthew 13:11,13-14) (Luke 8:10), "And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of G-d: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand. . ."

32 posted on 09/19/2001 7:50:37 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
Ummm, I said in my original post it's best to base one's faith on the plain text.

Perhaps folks don't know what FWIW means - For What It's Worth. I just posted it because I found it interesting, no more, no less. My faith is based on the plain text of Scripture.

The Bible Code folks do try to address the skeptics' questions at their website, make your own decision (like this crowd has to be encouraged to do so...). There are several other websites addressing the Bible Codes, perhaps I should not have posted one which is trying to make a buck. I agree that does cast doubt on the veracity of their work. Anyway, I simply found it interesting.

We certainly have far greater "plain text" issues facing us today... like can we determine God's will for each of us today, and if so how do we learn what He desires for us?

33 posted on 09/19/2001 8:07:24 AM PDT by Ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ted
We certainly have far greater "plain text" issues facing us today... like can we determine God's will for each of us today, and if so how do we learn what He desires for us?

By taking Him at His word and doing as He asks. Jesus refers us back to G-d's Commandments all the time.

34 posted on 09/19/2001 8:10:48 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
For some reason I do not beleive Jesus meant Bible codes!

Remember do not add or take away!

35 posted on 09/19/2001 8:15:11 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
beleive = "believe" (sorry)
36 posted on 09/19/2001 8:20:22 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Do you really think so re: free will?? If you take that position don't you in effect, discount all prophecies in the Bible. As far as the Code is concerned, I have read it and while fascinating, I cannot at this time accept it as gospel because the prophecies are always after the fact. Don't misunderstand me, I do accept Yashua Messiah as my Redeemer and Savior and am not a disbeliever of the Bible, just suspicious of making prediction AFTER an incident occurs.
37 posted on 09/19/2001 8:57:22 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: poet
Not really. The Codes disclose names, places and events that have already occurred. The Torah is still a sealed book as far as the future is concerned. Its been held by Jewish mystics that the Torah records every thing from the beginning down to the end of time in its Five Books.
38 posted on 09/19/2001 9:02:55 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
Remember do not add or take away!

Tell that to the early Christian churches

39 posted on 09/19/2001 9:25:15 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If that's true, why don't the interpreters tell us in advance what's going to occur??? Just asking.
40 posted on 09/19/2001 6:17:09 PM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ted
Here's the thing as I look at it.

My belief is in an omnipotent and omnicient God. With that it's not hard to believe that He could have inspired a "code" within the Bible. So, thus, at least to me, the idea of a Bible Code is well within the realm of possibility and probability.

However, it does seem to me that some of the "practioners" of "Bible Coding" (or whatever you want to call it) are taking some liberties and making some stretches to get things to work out.

again -- FWIW
41 posted on 09/19/2001 6:32:13 PM PDT by birbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"The Bible Codes are pure unadulterated BS."

You are correct, sir.

"Please note that the words of Scripture are the same words used in secular writing; the same consonant/vowel relationships..."

Actually, the Bible Code only works, according to "scholars," by using the original Hebrew text of the Old Testament. This leaves everything wide open to many interpretations because ancient Hebrew does not contain vowels. Going by such a guideline, anything can be derived from the text. Another peculiarity is that people have only used the Code to predict events that have already happened. If these Bible Code nuts really knew what they were talking about, they would have warned us of the WTC attack beforehand.

42 posted on 09/24/2001 10:21:19 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
"...so we can safely put it on the shelf for now."

I respectfully disagree. The Bible Code is as damaging to the message of the Gospel as the Left Behind series. Everyone gets so caught up in the mystical mumbo-jumbo that the real message is lost. We need to emphasize the importance of getting back to basics, meaning Scripture and prayer.

43 posted on 09/24/2001 10:30:31 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
RE: post #21

John 18:20, Matt. 12:39

But what do those verses really say? Let's come up with some funky new code that helps us understand what God was trying to say in the New Testament using the original Greek texts. According to the Bible Code scholars, Scripture cannot be taken at face value. Clear written words are not enough. We need to give the people some mystical, New Age slant to things to trick them into becoming believers.
</sarcasm>

44 posted on 09/24/2001 10:38:53 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
You can accomplish the EXACT same result using any sufficiently large collection of letters, such as the collected postings on Free Republic, the text of War and Peace, or an encyclopedia.

Not so, Poohbah. You just haven't dug enough into what has gone on in Bible code research. Skeptics fail to disprove them time after time after time. Yours is the first, most elementary argument that was immediately put forth when the codes were discovered and it was the first to be mathematically blown out of the water.

45 posted on 09/24/2001 10:44:04 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ted
WOW, the Code said you would post this today! I'm convinced. < / sarcasm >
46 posted on 09/24/2001 10:52:07 AM PDT by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted
This is neither News nor Current events. Whatever it is...
47 posted on 09/24/2001 10:57:06 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Believe me, I'm sorry I ever posted it... people either used it as an excuse to poke fun at the gospel, or took it too seriously, or took a potshot at me, or there were a few who found it interesting like I did but obviously have the balance to quickly say it's merely an interesting possibility.

Never mind...

48 posted on 09/24/2001 11:02:10 AM PDT by Ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The "Bible Code" is a crock.

If it's so useful, how come they never predict anything BEFORE it happens?

All they ever do is go back after the event and find the words they are already looking for.

49 posted on 09/24/2001 11:02:28 AM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Not true, I'm afraid. The standards of proof were very different (among other things, they did not render War and Peace in consonants only, per the Hebrew form for Scripture--not having vowels makes it SO much easier to find a given meaning--and while ANY conceivable rule for reading a given Scripture was allowed, the War and Peace reading had to use the SAME EXACT one used in the previous Scripture test).

It's still BS. Give me the consonants (no vowels) from War and Peace and allow me any arbitrary stepping order through them, and I will find all manner of secret messages.

50 posted on 09/24/2001 11:03:42 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson