Skip to comments.EVIDENCE GROWS OF DIRECT DISOBEDIENCE TO VATICAN IN MAJOR AMERICAN SEMINARIES
Posted on 07/02/2002 8:59:38 AM PDT by NYer
A couple of weeks ago we ran an item about a new book, Goodbye, Good Men, which focuses on the crisis in Catholic seminaries. Since we are in the midst of a scandal, most of what we reviewed had to do with liberalism and sexual immorality in the seminaries.
But there is much more to it than that, and as this book makes clear, at a good number of seminaries there is outright and sometimes outspoken disobedience to the Vatican. In fact, according to some seminarians, loyalty to John Paul II has sometimes been seen as grounds to disqualify a seminarian.
If one wants to glimpse the possibility of a future schism, the seminaries are where the seeds have been so amply (and ably) planted. We realize this book is controversial. A number of recent reviewers have called parts of it into question, and at turns it may be less than comprehensive. We're not sure. Nor do we know about the author's work other than this book.
What we do know is that the central premise -- corruption in seminaries -- is something that has been painfully observed for many years and simply needed to be put between two hard covers. When it is, the crisis crystallizes.
Take the case of Mary Immaculate Seminary in Northampton, Pennsylvania. According to one former seminarian quoted in the book, Father John Trigilio, "they would come right out in the classroom and at the pulpit and deny dogmas of the Catholic faith or at least sow the seeds of doubt and dissent -- from the divine personhood of Christ to inerrancy of Scripture to the infallibility of the ordinary magisterium."
There were questions about the Virgin birth. There were questions on whether Jesus knew He was God.
Now, hear us well: we agree there are extremes. There are conservative extremists (who declare as heretics anyone who doesn't share precisely the same devotions) as well as the liberal extremists (as personified by those who are currently in control of too many seminaries). We acknowledge that there are extremes at both ends, and that both can be equally destructive. Some of those who call themselves "orthodox" are sometimes more interested in legalism than in Christ's central teachings of love and charity.
But enough is enough: According to Father Trigilio, there is a "new Bible theology" at seminaries teaching that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John didn't really write anything; that the idea of Mass "sacrifice" is an antiquated pagan idea; and that "all the miracles attributed to Jesus in the New Testament were fabrications."
No wonder our priests doubt the True Presence. No wonder they reject the Blessed Mother's apparitions! Moreover, it turns out that John Paul II was so concerned about what was going on in U.S. seminaries that in 1981 he instructed the bishops to investigate, but that investigation only touched the surface and many seminaries, it seems, were able to circumvent the investigators. When the Vatican team came to Mary Immaculate Seminary, for example, "things they never did, like benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, were all of a sudden done." But when the investigators left, says the book (by Michael S. Rose), the encyclicals went back on the remote shelves, rosaries were put back in drawers, and clerics were stashed away in chiffoniers.
If you had a photo of the Pope in your room, says the priest, "they kept a close eye on you." Liberal faculty members were "sick and tired" of John Paul II. Most of the time when a guy was expelled from the seminary, charged Father Trigilio, it was because he was "too Catholic."
A "diabolical element" had pervaded the seminaries, he told Rose. "There were nights when I couldn't even sleep because I was so scared. I could almost feel the presence of evil in that place. The way the priests had so much disdain for the Eucharist and for Mary, for example, was outright hostility."
To be objective: it is not just a conservative-liberal issue. The evil cuts on both sides.
Plenty of the priests accused of abuse were "conservative." I saw this last week in the church nearest my own home where a former associate pastor was removed from ministry
But it is the liberal mentality -- especially the proclivity for humanistic psychology -- that has been so tolerant as to form the soil of germination. It is the humanistic mindset that strips the divinity from Christ, that disclaims the virgin birth, that disbelieves in anything immaterial. It is the humanistic mindset that is "open" to sinful sex and that convinced bishops to give child abusers second and third chances. Last weekend, when they made the announcement at the local church, they brought in four "counselors" to advise the faithful, at the same time that it was explained that it was therapists who has allowed this priest to return to begin with!
Too much psychology. Too little prayer. Look: John Paul II is a giant who towers over guys like Freud and Jung. We need to realize this. Instead, we're busy buying into science's rejection of anything it can't see in a microscope (which means the supernatural).
And then there is the simple spirit of rebellion. This is a powerful spirit (see 1 Samuel 15:23) and it has caused too many American seminaries to become breeding grounds for schism.
Again, we don't know, in the end, how balanced Goodbye, Good Men will be, and we have our own concerns about too freely making allegations. Within the Church, one must be very, very careful with muckraking. The Church has enough enemies!
But when they're teaching future priests to disdain the Pope:
That has to stop right now, or right now we have to stop calling these seminaries Catholic.
Yes! And this more than validates this book and its value to the remnant faithful.
I experienced this first hand at Providence College, which is used by our diocese for the Permanent Deacons' formation and some of the priestly vocations(pre-theologate).
A former neighbor left the seminary during the '80's for the very same reason. So, what does that say about those who do graduate from the seminary and serve as ordained priests? Heads up during homilies!
Thank you Rudy Bultmann! (you liberal protestant !@#$%^&@#$%^&*@#$%^&* house wrecker you!)
I am reading "Windswept House" and boy, is the premise of the story applicable to what is going on today - the disobedience to the Papal office. I wonder how much of the story is fact, and how much is fiction.
One could argue that some of the colleges, seminaries, religious orders, and chanceries are practically in schism, directly opposing church teachings and Catholic orthodoxy in many areas. If activist sodomite wreckovators like Weakland were not in schism, opposing church teachings, who is?
Fr. Gould (on EWTN) had the right idea. Close down all but four or five and put them all under close surveillance. All rectors and faculty must take a yearly oath of fidelity to the Pope amd the Magisterium. And send in some ringers.
My understanding is that Cardinal Kasper has said as much (at least regards the Divinity of Our Lord and the miracles) in a book he wrote. I haven't yet tracked down a copy, but if true he is a public heretic AND a Cardinal of the Church. It also explains his bizzarre ruling regards the "Mass" of the heretical Abyssinian Church of the East and the Chaldean Rite of the Catholic Church.
Always approach with caution. Isn't that an awful predicament. And the Bishops have been allowing this!!!!
Modern biblical criticism, Liberation Theology, "death of God" theology, existentialism, Freud, etc.,...all this stuff is presented as if it is gospel, as if it is "science" and written in stone, while Thomism, Catholic doctrine, miracles are all subjected to doubt. Unfortunately, there is this trendy mentality which welcomes with giddy enthusiasm every liberal, modernist, and humanist ideology. At the same time that clergy were embracingt Freud, for instance, most of his quackery was being rejected by medical schools and professional psychiatric associations. It's that stupid. A lot of these guys are not really that bright, despite the jargon-laden, pseudo-intellectual pretensions. The whole attempt in Liberation Theology to mate Christianity with Communism or Socialism, for instance, is a classic exmple of how stupid and corrupt some of these types are. The homosexualism is in the same category. These people are working out neurotic hang-ups and all sorts of emotional grudges, and psychological problems through the machinery, power, and prestige of church institutions. You almost need doctoral specialization in abormal psychology to figure out what really is going on with the antics of some of these deranged types.
I simply disregard the critics of Michael Rose. His analysis may not be a perfect scholarly endeavor, but it is 100% right on.