Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arminianism Another Gospel
http://www.hereistand.net/Maclean.htm ^ | 7/23/02 | Rev. William Maclean, M.A.

Posted on 07/23/2002 1:32:14 PM PDT by RnMomof7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: RnMomof7
I can see that.
21 posted on 07/23/2002 5:35:51 PM PDT by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wrigley
How would you counter that quote if what was meant by it was this. We are not Protestants because we didn't break off from Rome. We were never part of the Roman church, we were always independant of the Roman church? There fore I am not a Protestant.

You sprang forth from either the Roman Catholic church or the "Protest" with gave us "Protestanism." If not this, see the final paragraph. THE church was the Roman Catholic church, until Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses of 1517. Luther didn't mean to start a "Reformation," but thanks to the printing press (the mass production of the Luther's "protest" translated from Latin to German in which even the fairly illiterate laymen could read) and the churches heretical teaching that one's soul can be purchased (with money) out of the mythical purgatory, the Reformation began.

If you are not a Protestant, then you're even more the imagination of man, like Islam, Buddism, Hinduism, Confucianism, Wiccans, New Agers, LDS, WCC, WCOTC, NoI, British-Israelism, NoY (Black Hebrew Israelites), practitioner of voodoo, etc.

22 posted on 07/23/2002 5:50:35 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
You know Mom, I hate to keep ragging on you about this subject, but you keep laying down the gauntlet. You are a hypocrite.

You call Arminianism "ANOTHER GOSPEL" yet you continue to fellowship among those who preach it. If this article is true, then you are fellowshiping among the "accursed." You, by your presence at an Arminian church are contributing to propigation of a FALSE GOSPEL.

If you truly believe that Arminianism is a false gospel or another gospel, then you are contributing to the damnation of those that you are now fellowshiping because your presence at their church is a tacit endorsement of the teachings of that Church.

I certainly don't believe that Calvinism is "another gospel." Calvinism is another theology. It is another way of viewing the mysteries of the gospel. Arminianism is not the gospel, it is merely another way of interpreting the manner in which those who come to Christ actually do come to Christ.

But some of you have laid down the gauntlet and have accused those of us who are not Calvinists of preaching "another gospel."

Well its time to put up or shut up. Is it "Another Gospel?" If it is then are not not bringing damnation upon yourself and others by having fellowship with those whom God has declared accursed?

How about a public answer this time?

23 posted on 07/23/2002 6:13:24 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If you truly believe that Arminianism is a false gospel or another gospel, then you are contributing to the damnation of those that you are now fellowshiping because your presence at their church is a tacit endorsement of the teachings of that Church.

Slow ya roll.

Did not Christ eat and sit with sinners?

24 posted on 07/23/2002 6:16:02 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I have been going to other churches for the last couple of months looking for a "match"..I have found a Reformed Baptist start up that I have loved (imagine reading three FULL chapters of Scripture at a service)...no seeker friendly preaching going on ..but they lack facilities for my granddaughters

I live in Finneys burned over district..there is not a selection of Calvinist/refomed churches..in fact other than the start up there is zero in Buffalo

25 posted on 07/23/2002 6:20:20 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Game know game:>)
26 posted on 07/23/2002 6:22:02 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
True dat.
27 posted on 07/23/2002 6:22:42 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; xzins
Now that is funny! xzins is over on another thread telling me I should pray and see if his words are true! Talk about a Mormon encounter....

Interesting. Am I to infer from this that Calvinists don't put much stock in prayer, even to the point of mocking those who believe in prayer as a source of answers?

28 posted on 07/23/2002 9:30:05 PM PDT by Some hope remaining.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Some hope remaining.; fortheDeclaration; CCWoody; winstonchurchill; Revelation 911; ...
Now that is funny! xzins is over on another thread telling me I should pray and see if his words are true! Talk about a Mormon encounter.... Interesting. Am I to infer from this that Calvinists don't put much stock in prayer, even to the point of mocking those who believe in prayer as a source of answers?

Actually, I asked Woody to pray over the scriptures (over the bible) in question. And, yes, he did mock that.

There is a logical argument that can be made that calvinists do not think prayer can effectively change anything. There is a brand of calvinism that believes every single action/act in all of history is predetermined and initiated by God. In that regard, everything they could possibly pray for would have already been determined. In that view, prayer would be futile.

29 posted on 07/23/2002 9:40:04 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
RnMom, Calivn was WRONG!!!! It seems like you are more interested in rejecting something "Romish" than getting to the truth. Is it true or not? That's the question. Read the below carefully.

"But in order to legitimize his heresy, Calvin had to present his new teaching as something ancient. Therefore, he appealed to the authority of St. Augustine. But Augustine, "the Doctor of Grace," was in no way a Calvinist, for in one sentence, he rejects TULIP: "If, however, being already regenerate and justified, he relapses of his own will into an evil life, assuredly he cannot say, `I have not received,' because of his own free choice to evil he has lost the grace of God, that he had received."

30 posted on 07/23/2002 11:00:09 PM PDT by Theresa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theresa
Theresa please read these threads and/or put them in your file for future reference.

They disprove 2 of calvinist's critical 5 points.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/720876/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/720967/posts
31 posted on 07/23/2002 11:07:17 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Theresa
Theresa ..the discussion on what is "romish" is not a "personal " one.

There was a reformation in the church.The reformation was about doctrine that differed from Rome.

So when a NC group denies the doctrine of the reformation they are considered "romish" or romanish meaning they continued in the teaching of Rome in that area..(BTW I usually do not use the phrase "romish" it was an uncomfortable feel to it for me to use).

The quote you give has been discussed many times..I see someone gave you links

Augustine believed in election..he wrote it

It was actually Luther that was the most prolific writer on predestination and election BTW not Calvin. But for some reason the belief in the Sovereignity of God has carried his name as a "nicnmame"

So consider this..Two Catholic are the fathers of Calvinism..:>)

32 posted on 07/24/2002 5:35:22 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
Do Wesley and Moody not love the Lord??? Are those who hold to the tenants of Arminianism going to burn in Hell??? I find the vitriol in these discussions truly saddening. The Church should be united even if it has differences of opinion/interpretation in its members. This talk of Calvinism and Arminianism divides the Church and creates schisms over foolishness. I would dare say Wesley loved the Lord as much as Calvin did, who loved the Lord as much as Arminias, who loved the Lord as much as Spurgeon. If Calvin is right, that does not give one a license to split or cause division in the Church, and the same applies for Arminias. We are called as members of the Church to function together and fellowship as ONE Body, not bodies separated by every wind of doctrine. So what if I believe that you cant lose your salvation (Calvinism) and that God will never impose on my free will (Arminianism). If I am wrong, than I pray that the Holy Spirit will open my eyes, and that I won't fall into the trap of spiritual pride and legalistic demagoguery (sp?) that has polluted this debate. I think it is healthy to have debate, but it is unhealthy when it causes division. Nothing you or I will ever say will change anyones point of view, without the working of the Holy Spirit. Knowledge makes arrogant, but love edifies. We should all be seeking to know Christ and Him crucified, everything else is foolishness. What good is knowing doctrine, if we don't know the Lord. I would much rather be foolish in doctrine, but in love with the Lord, than wise in doctrine and have disdain for my brother.

JM
33 posted on 07/24/2002 6:35:41 AM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Some hope remaining.; xzins; winstonchurchill; rdb3; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley; zadok; RnMomof7; ...

Interesting. Am I to infer from this that Calvinists don't put much stock in prayer, even to the point of mocking those who believe in prayer as a source of answers?

Tell you what. You find for me in the scriptures (Bible only) where it says that I should pray about the words of another man to see if they are true or not. Meanwhile, while you are vainly struggling to find that, I'll quote to directly from the word of God:

Now, I am well aware that you Mormons teach that one should mock God and call into question his Word by asking that we pray about it to see if it is true. But, when John was in prison and doubting the words concerning Christ that he had so boldly declared when he saw Him, Jesus did not tell John's disciples to believe His words; Jesus told John to believe the Scriptures:
Now, did Jesus tell John to believe his words or did He even tell him to pray? He said tell him what you see and John will know the answer because he knows the TRUE scriptures. Jesus said essentially to John, "Does what is happening agree with the prophecies in Isa 61:1 and many others."

Unfortunately, you Mormons have replaced the true source of knowledge and truth in the Bible with secret wispers from your "prophets" and "heart burn".
34 posted on 07/24/2002 6:56:28 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM; RnMomof7; OrthodoxPresbyterian; the_doc; drstevej; Jerry_M; Jean Chauvin; rdb3; Wrigley; ..
If Calvin is right, that does not give one a license to split or cause division in the Church, and the same applies for Arminias.

And yet, Wesley, caused a division in the church in the middle of a revival because of his hatred for the truth. Off hand, I'm really trying to remember if any Calvinist caused divisions in the Church in the middle of revivals. Perhaps you should preach those words to those who actively seek division.

Looks like he spoke unrepentant lies about a true defender of the faith as well, but we will not go there....
35 posted on 07/24/2002 7:06:10 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
"And yet, Wesley, caused a division in the church ... "

The same applies to him. He is not exempt. If he caused division in the Church then it was wrong. I am not favoring any man, I am trying to point out the destruction that spiritual pride in doctrine can cause in the Church.

JM
36 posted on 07/24/2002 7:25:09 AM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
"Perhaps you should preach those words to those who actively seek division."

The fact that Calvinists (i.e. followers of Calvin) exists is proof to the fact that it causes division. We have Wesleyan, Lutheran, Calvin, Methodist, Baptist, Presbyterian, and the list goes on. All divisions in the Church. Divisions based on doctrine or on men. The Body of Christ, the Church, is one, not many.

JM
37 posted on 07/24/2002 7:30:43 AM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
The fact that Calvinists (i.e. followers of Calvin Jesus) exists. . .

Don't think so. Try again.

38 posted on 07/24/2002 7:38:05 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Some hope remaining.; Wrigley
Actually, I asked Woody to pray over the scriptures (over the bible) in question. And, yes, he did mock that.

There is a logical argument that can be made that calvinists do not think prayer can effectively change anything

Why do you say that when you know it is not true?

It is actually Arminians that SHOULD NOT pray IF they are to be faithful to THEIR doctrine..

If you pray and God changed the person then YOU have interfered with that persons free will

So thus your prayer for a sinner in need of salvation would go like this

Heavenly Father I ask you to STAY AWAY " do not touch or move anything. Allow my loved one to use their free will without you interfering.

An Arminian can never pray for God to intervene in any situation because it is an afront to mans free will.

On the other hand Calvinists have NO PROBLEM asking God to act sovereignly and impact the will of man....We pray for that impact..WE want God to act..

And we know that God knowing all things in advance KNEW we were going to pray..Our prayer is a PART of His will and Plan..

So xzins..How is it you tell woody to "pray "over his bible ..but you do not pray to have God open your eyes to the truth of your conversion?

BTW Hope an intersting historical sidelight..Joseph Smith was a Methodist like xzins..the Methodists teach the "strangly warmed heart'.......I suspect that is where Joseph got his "burning breast " belief from.

39 posted on 07/24/2002 7:54:31 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"Don't think so. Try again."

Post 12 by rdb3:
Not only was he a Baptist, but he was a stalwart Calvinist.

Funny how Spurgeon wasn't described with respect to Christ (i.e. Christian) only with respect to doctrine or to men.

JM
40 posted on 07/24/2002 8:06:39 AM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson