Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema
In other words, you don't have an argument against the article. I am guessing from your responses that you won't read it. I will end with this quote from Newman in the article:

I say it distinctly--there may be many excuses at the last day, good and bad, for not being Catholics; one I cannot conceive: "O Lord, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was so derogatory to Thy Grace, so inconsistent with Thy Passion, so at variance with Thy word in Genesis and the Apocalypse, so unlike the teaching of Thy first Saints and Martyrs, as to give me a right to reject it at all risks, and Thy Church for teaching it. It is a doctrine as to which my private judgment is fully justified in opposing the Church's judgment. And this is my plea for living and dying a Protestant". [just subtitute the word orthodox for protestant--it will still apply]

31 posted on 08/07/2002 6:54:39 AM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: JMJ333
I read the article and I do have an argument against it. It is an unnecessary attempt to explain something that is unexplainable.
32 posted on 08/07/2002 7:28:03 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson