Skip to comments.
30,000 Protestant Denominations?
http://www.pressiechurch.org/Shepherding_the_Sheep/How%20many%20Protestant%20denominations%20are%20there.htm ^
| 9/24/02
| Eric Svendsen
Posted on 09/24/2002 7:54:39 PM PDT by RnMomof7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-352 next last
To: RnMomof7
Do YOU really believe that most Protestants believe the doctrine??
To: xzins
Exactly, those groups generally splintered off from the "reformed" groups due to doctrinal diffeences.
To: xzins
Memory says that you'd find in the neighborhood of 200 or so distinctive non-Roman Catholic, Christian religious denominations. You can order the book from Air Force publications. I can get you an address if you're interested.
And I THINK that is even "high" if we are discussing doctrine...
for instance doctrinally your church has few distinctives with the other "Wesleyan" churches.(except you are more liberal:>)
43
posted on
09/25/2002 7:44:04 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: al_c
That said ... how many reps, govs, senators, etc. are non-Catholic and pro-choice? Lots..but for most of them it is not a doctrinal breach..that was his point
44
posted on
09/25/2002 7:46:14 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: xzins
I guess they needed some word to express non-Roman Catholic Christian so they came up with "protestant."
The word comes from the protest. The founders of protestant sects didn't like what the original, main church said, so they protested - and either left or were kicked out. Their followers were identified as "protestants."
To: Revelation 911
an excellent point Mom - I can attest it is accurate from my limited experience having been raised in an Italian Catholic household. It was inherited with the family sauce recipe.When my sisters and I all left "the church" all my dad (who was "excommunicated" for marrying a divorced woman) could say is "we are a catholic family, we have always been a catholic family"...Well that has changed we are now a protestant family that has some Catholic relatives *grin*.
All of us "girls" have left.. and our families are for the most part non Catholic..
46
posted on
09/25/2002 7:50:52 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: xzins
The Assemblies of God, eg, didn't even exist in the reformation. NOR did the Methodists, Church of Christ, and Evangelical Free....and etc.yep as I always tell you you are NOT a Protestant (except to the Catholics *grin*)
47
posted on
09/25/2002 7:52:41 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
except you are more liberal:>)
The correct term is "more sane." Have you ever tried to use the bible to prove the old holiness doctrine of sinless perfection? Those folks were way out of line biblically. They'd let their theology run far away from their bible.
Besides, you just might be surprised how really conservative I am.
48
posted on
09/25/2002 7:53:23 AM PDT
by
xzins
To: Notwithstanding
Do YOU really believe that most Protestants believe the doctrine??Yes and I will tell you why..If they have a doctrinal "problem" with one or more of the points they have the option of other churches that better reflect their beliefs..Doctrine is very important to "observant" Protestants .Yes there are Sunday and holiday Protestants just as their are Catholics..But by and large they select their "Sunday" church with care ..
49
posted on
09/25/2002 7:57:05 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: Desdemona; RnMomof7; drstevej
. The founders of protestant sects didn't like what the original, main church said, so they protested
Yeah, I know that part. That's why they called Luther's, Calvin's, Henry's (although his wasn't doctrinal) and a very few others "protestants."
But why do you call "evangelical congregational" protestant? They didn't exist until 400 years later, they're not protesting anything, and they are only connected to those original groups through splinters of splinters of splinters.
If it's fair to trace splinters back, then it makes exactly as much sense to call them Roman Catholic.
50
posted on
09/25/2002 7:58:45 AM PDT
by
xzins
To: xzins
You my dear friend are an exception to the Methodist rule . I have known that a long time
51
posted on
09/25/2002 7:58:56 AM PDT
by
RnMomof7
To: RnMomof7
Lots..but for most of them it is not a doctrinal breach..that was his point Point taken. But it's sad that it's not a doctrinal breach for them. :o(
52
posted on
09/25/2002 8:02:37 AM PDT
by
al_c
To: al_c; Notwithstanding
Uh ... Dave ... how many times did Jesus refer to God as "Father?" I don't deny that God is revealed to us as Father. And I abhor the use of inclusive language, as it is against revelation. however, this does not make God male.
But, why repeat? What Notwithstanding said:
"In His image He created them. Male and female He created them."
Now, if women are created in God's image, it seems apparent that God has the attributes of both males and females, without nullifying the fact that God chose to reveal Himself as Father and Son and use masculine pronouns in Scripture when referring to the Holy Spirit.
God is greater than either male of female.
SD
To: xzins
But why do you call "evangelical congregational" protestant? They didn't exist until 400 years later, they're not protesting anything, and they are only connected to those original groups through splinters of splinters of splinters. Sure they're protesting. Otherwise why the "splinters?"
Protestors of protestors of protestors of protestors in a direct link back to the original Protestors.
SD
To: SoothingDave; RnMomof7; Revelation 911; drstevej
Sure they're protesting. Otherwise why the "splinters?" The protest must be against the Roman Catholic Church for the appellation "Protestant" to apply.
Since real Catholics protest abortion, am I to conclude they are also protestants?
Besides it doesn't necessarily follow that a splinter implies a protest. It could be a different vision with no protest. It could be an isolation that brought about a new group by neccessity. It could be a purely political reason for denominations to spring up....something that happened regularly during the civil war.
55
posted on
09/25/2002 8:11:07 AM PDT
by
xzins
To: Catholicguy; xzins
No, thank you. I was just interested in the number that protestants would find acceptable.
Why do you insist on an answer which is impossible to give? Are you aware of any single "authority" which speaks for all Protestants? If so, ask that "authority"?
To: xzins
The protest must be against the Roman Catholic Church for the appellation "Protestant" to apply. I agree. Are you suggesting that these groups are in agreement with Roman theology? Of course not. They merely add to their protest of Rome protest of the group from which they splintered.
(I do acknowledge that this is for purely political reasons at times, but even then the spirit of protesting Rome remains.)
SD
To: Desdemona; xzins
The word comes from the protest. The founders of protestant sects didn't like what the original, main church said, so they protested - and either left or were kicked out. Their followers were identified as "protestants."
Really?
"Whereas Roman apologists often tend to think of the term "protest" in negative manner, the word derives from the Latin pro + testare, which together mean "to witness for". In other words, to "protest" is an essentially positive action, not a negative one."
For a different perspective Go here:
To: SoothingDave; xzins
Protestors of protestors of protestors of protestors in a direct link back to the original Protestors.
Oh? All the way back to the One True Original Church!
To: SoothingDave
I guess we're looking at it from different angles. I'm looking at the historical split. You're looking at a "process" that leads to any split.
I don't even think about whether I'm in agreement with Roman theology. It isn't an issue. I'm not protesting anything having to do with them.
I disagree on some things. I agree on others. If my disagreements make me a "protester" do my agreements make me a "kissin' cousin?" LOL :>)
60
posted on
09/25/2002 8:55:35 AM PDT
by
xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-352 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson