My "Take" on the Current Rapture-of-the-Church Craze

IntellectualConservative.com ^ | December 4, 2002 | J. Grant Swank, Pastor

[Quester]

I think that's a bit harsh, but your wrote and posted the article and I defer to your self assessment.

Make that ... grand self-assessment.

[CCWoody]

Actually, grant wrote the article, but his evil twin posted the article.

[grantswank]

hmmmmmmm.

i thought the intelligensia gathered at this site. but alas, proven incorrect in some cases once again. nevertheless, for those who truly fit the definition, wonderful chatting with you.

[PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain]

i thought the intelligensia gathered at this site. but alas, proven incorrect in some cases once again. nevertheless, for those who truly fit the definition, wonderful chatting with you.

LOL...she wacked you guys pee pees. :)

BigMack

[grantswank]

they let the loonies out, eh?

[grantswank]

how quickly small minds divert from the major topic at hand, that is, the posted article.

o well.

can't win 'em all.

[PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain]

they let the loonies out, eh?

Well I like these guys, I don't agree with them much, I was just poking fun at them.

And you might get a bit further around here if you would take some poking yourself, and not post and run, this is a site for debate, if you're gonna post something expect it to get debated, and grow some thicher skin, stay and get to know these folks. The may not agree with you, bit they will have more respect for what you have to say.

BigMack

[grantswank]

thanks for your counsel but i don't need it.

i wrote the article.

no need for my debating it.

the sentences are plainly presenting the thesis.

further sentences only disturb the small minds such as dr steve and his ilk who hang out where you do.

got it?

got it.

if you have wisdom to disseminate, i would suggest that you begin with a few lines to dr steve and his ilk rather than arranging for a session with yours truly.

thanks.

[grantswank]

p.s.:

what a site such as this one needs is not thicker skin, as you suggest, just a few more brain cells that are arranged in a logical progression.

[PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain]

I have a question.

What is wrong with debating what you wrote?

BigMack

[grantswank]

bye

[PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain]

I'm just trying to understand why you post something and then don't want to talk about it, I have not flamed you or spoken ill of you. I just don't understand.

BigMack

[CCWoody]

Like talking to a tree stump, huh!

[PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain]

I have seen some weird things on here, but this one is at the top of the list.

BigMack

[grantswank]

o, cc, of course the 'bye' was not meant for you, natch.

but of course one would want to enter lively, intelligent debate on a topic -- cetainly -- given the snide, juvenile, sophomoric opening post you gave in immediate response to the article.

talk about weeney minds initiating a well-balanced, in-depth debate about a most significant posted topic.

but then again, as i stated earlier, one can't win 'em all. not usually on this site, eh? sad, actually.

so. . .bye. . .cc.

[drstevej]

***i wrote the article. no need for my debating it.***

Just collect it/them and put into the canon, right?

[Wrigley]

Did the poetry branch get a little boring for you?

[Wrigley]

no need for my debating it.

the sentences are plainly presenting the thesis.

You certainly are a proud, little man. As if your words are the end all of any topic.

[Wrigley]

Just like JS.

[grantswank]

o, tiny brain cells showed up again. i thought you had slid off.

bye.