What "agenda"? You assume, because he's gay, that Egerton has an agenda.
There are Catholics on this forum who, like Ratzinger and Groeschel, do everything they can to blame outside forces (the media, permissive society, Vatican II) for the actions of very sinful men. That's their "agenda."
What's important is what is true. And it's true that Fr. Groeschel advised at least one bishop on the disposition of abusive priests.
If these men abused again, why were they turned loose on the faithful a second, or third, time?