Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative vs. Traditional Catholicism - Distinctions with Philosophical Differences
Latin Mass Magazine ^ | Spring 2001 | Fr. Chad Ripperger, FSSP

Posted on 07/15/2003 2:07:08 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2003 2:07:08 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; Polycarp; Pyro7480; Loyalist; narses
I found this recently. It is a long but worthwhile read which I think accurately describes the differences we encounter here on the forum.
2 posted on 07/15/2003 2:11:16 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/15/2003 2:11:58 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Magisterialism is a fixation on the teachings that pertain only to the current Magisterium. Since extrinsic tradition has been subverted and since the Vatican tends to promulgate documents exhibiting a lack of concern regarding some previous magisterial acts, many have begun ignoring the previous magisterial acts and now listen only to the current Magisterium.

This problem is exacerbated by our current historical conditions. As the theological community began to unravel before, during and after Vatican II, those who considered themselves orthodox were those who were obedient and intellectually submissive to the Magisterium, since those who dissented were not orthodox. Therefore the standard of orthodoxy was shifted from Scripture, intrinsic tradition (of which the Magisterium is a part) and extrinsic tradition (which includes magisterial acts of the past, such as Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors), to a psychological state in which only the current Magisterium is followed.

Neoconservatives have fallen into this way of thinking. The only standard by which they judge orthodoxy is whether or not one follows the current Magisterium. As a general rule, traditionalists tend to be orthodox in the sense that they are obedient to the current Magisterium, even though they disagree about matters of discipline and have some reservations about certain aspects of current magisterial teachings that seem to contradict the previous Magisterium (e.g., the role of the ecumenical movement). Traditionalists tend to take not just the current Magisterium as their norm but also Scripture, intrinsic tradition, extrinsic tradition and the current Magisterium as the principles of judgment of correct Catholic thinking. This is what distinguishes traditionalists and neoconservatives

4 posted on 07/15/2003 2:16:46 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: As you well know...
ping
5 posted on 07/15/2003 2:17:26 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Thank you so much! I also visited the link to the Latin Mass magazine and printed some other articles out.
6 posted on 07/15/2003 2:30:47 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diago; narses; Loyalist; BlackElk; american colleen; saradippity; Polycarp; Dajjal; ...
Bump for Fr. Chad Ripperger, FSSP. He is amazingly brilliant.

This has been posted in the past, but it's one of the best articles of all time, so it's worth reading again.
7 posted on 07/15/2003 4:23:22 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
I am not a big fan of his... I believe he strays a little too far from the Orthodox position... but then again... he would call me a neo-conservative
8 posted on 07/15/2003 4:44:30 PM PDT by Saint Athanasius (How can there be too many children? That's like saying there are too many flowers - Mother Theresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
This publication of the essay contains many more footnotes.
http://www.christianorder.com/features/features_2001/features_mar01.html

-Telit
9 posted on 07/15/2003 4:59:21 PM PDT by Telit Likitis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
It is a long but worthwhile read which I think accurately describes the differences we encounter here on the forum.

Accurate? This guy clearly holds neoconservatives in contempt. He calls them "magisterialists." To assert that "neoconservatives" don't have the anchor of Scripture, or intrinsic or extrinsic tradition, is plain silly and arrogant.

He also teaches at a minor seminary, which is one of the anachronisms of the pre-Vatican II Church.

There is no good reason for "minor seminaries." Herding 13 year old boys into environments where they are denied contact with the opposite sex and given the impression that they can discern, at that age, a vocation to the priesthood, is ridiculous.

10 posted on 07/15/2003 5:06:12 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He calls them "magisterialists

Have you seen some of the comments here? It was a bullseye description.

To assert that "neoconservatives" don't have the anchor of Scripture, or intrinsic or extrinsic tradition, is plain silly and arrogant.

It's correct. For neos, life began at Vatican II 35 years ago. That's a tradition of 35 years, not 2000 years. That's not Tradition by its very notion.

11 posted on 07/15/2003 5:12:21 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Telit Likitis
Sorry. I copied everything that was there, or so I thought.
12 posted on 07/15/2003 5:12:58 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
For neos, life began at Vatican II 35 years ago.

Deborah, you've been sucked in by the Ultra-Trads, and especially the SSPXers.

This "us" against "them" mentality that the Trads promote (with the Trads, of course, upholding Tradition, and the Novus Ordo admirers viewed as silly teenagers) does more to harm the Church than anything the "neoconservatives" promote.

13 posted on 07/15/2003 5:21:43 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Sink,

This two in a row!!!!

Again, you have hit the nail on the head! Let's see if I agree with you a third time today...
14 posted on 07/15/2003 5:31:30 PM PDT by Saint Athanasius (How can there be too many children? That's like saying there are too many flowers - Mother Theresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
Sorry, but the us against them mentality is promoted just as much if not more by the NO crowd here. It is a huge turnoff.

I've been watching for quite a while now and the side which makes the most consistent, most reasonable arguments are the traditionalists. This article is just one more in the line I've found exploring this side.

16 posted on 07/15/2003 5:37:53 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
"I'm sick of the 'neo and 'post-conciliar' labels. They are meant to be divisive."

I agree.
17 posted on 07/15/2003 5:50:25 PM PDT by Patrick Madrid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
This division twixt trads and neo-cons is the work of Satan. The Liturgy ought never have been permitted to have undergone such radical changes without continuing the 1962 Roman Missal as an option for those who desired to worship as did their Fathers and Grandfathers and Great Grandfathers.

The Church IS big enough for us to fight the doctrinal battles WITHIN the Body of Christ without either of the syblings forcing the other to leave the house. What the hell kind of a family is it that never fights over matters of life and death?

Dominicans and Franciscans disagreed on Grace yet both remained within the house of the Family of God. (So what if the Molinists were wrong?)

Basta.

Neo-Cons and Trads are Catholics.

I have yet to see either a Trad or a Neo profess heresy since I have been reading these threads.

The Pope COULD settle this in a heartbeat. He has the authority.

18 posted on 07/15/2003 5:51:25 PM PDT by As you well know...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: As you well know...; Patrick Madrid
No doubt both are Catholic but both sides are preaching and teaching very different things. That's concerning.
19 posted on 07/15/2003 6:00:04 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He also teaches at a minor seminary, which is one of the anachronisms of the pre-Vatican II Church.

The above statement of yours proves his point better than anything he said in the article.

20 posted on 07/15/2003 6:01:09 PM PDT by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson