Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul's campaign buzz resonates on Internet
HOUSTON CHRONICLE ^ | 26 AUGUST 2007 | HOUSTON CHRONICLE

Posted on 08/26/2007 7:43:52 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

Republican presidential hopeful Rep. Ron Paul participates in the Londonderry Old Home Day Parade in Londonderry, NH, on August 18. Approximately 8,000 spectators lined up along the 1.2-mile parade route.

CENTER STRAFFORD, N.H. — In a New Hampshire meadow on a recent weekend, Ron Paul is without a doubt the main draw at a Republican presidential straw poll that attracts several long shot candidates.

Paying little heed to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and Rep. Tom Tancredo, the immigration-control firebrand from Colorado, a crowd circles the Texan to quiz him on everything from foreign policy to the Federal Reserve's intervention in the jittery financial markets.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Candidates; RLC News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/26/2007 7:43:53 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; KDD; JTN; Abcdefg; Turbopilot; billbears; Borax Queen; OrthodoxPresbyterian

Another great post on Dr. Paul’s campaign.


2 posted on 08/26/2007 7:46:53 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

That’s good - thanks for the ping!


3 posted on 08/26/2007 7:57:36 AM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
He has quite a following here in Huntsville, AL. There are a lot of signs and I’ve seen several groups holding signs similar to the one above.
4 posted on 08/26/2007 8:00:42 AM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

BUMP


5 posted on 08/26/2007 8:08:07 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...

Ron Paul campaign website

Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday]
PodcastWeekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave

6 posted on 08/26/2007 8:17:10 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

ping


7 posted on 08/26/2007 8:22:22 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

I was a t a friensds party yesterday evening, and Ron Paul was a topic of conversation. In very favorable way.


8 posted on 08/26/2007 8:23:14 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

How is he polling nationally?


9 posted on 08/26/2007 8:24:26 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
How is he polling nationally?

How many of his supporters are actually polled? How many own landline phones?

10 posted on 08/26/2007 8:25:31 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

He’s probably leading and we just don’t know it, I guess.


11 posted on 08/26/2007 8:27:17 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I was at this event, it was awesome. Dr. Paul was mobbed all day, and his speech drew some really loud cheers from the crowd. Our grassroots organization is very strong here because for once people are really psyched to have a candidate they can support on at least 85% of the issues.


12 posted on 08/26/2007 8:46:42 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
13 posted on 08/26/2007 9:15:35 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Good find!


14 posted on 08/26/2007 9:16:18 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

101 reasons to vote for Ron Paul in 2008

1. He Supports the Constitution. (Wow Go Figure!)
2. He Believes In Religious Freedom.
3. He Has Never Voted For A Tax Increase.
4. He Is Against Public Funding Of Abortion.
5. He Is Against Funding Abortion Abroad.
6. He Is Against The National I.D. or Real I.D. Act.
7. He Believes In The “Just War Theory”.
8. He Supports The Rights Of Private Property Owners.
9. He Wants Us Out Of The U.N.
10. He Wants Us To Trade With Nations And Not War With Them.
11. He Is For 2nd Amendment Rights.
12. He Opposes NAIS.
13. He Wants To Shrink The Federal Government, Not Expand It.
14. He Has No Plans To Start A War With Iran Or Anyone Else.
15. He Wants To Bring Our Troops Home.
16. He Does Not Belong To The CFR (Council On Foreign Relations).
17. He Has Not Received Campaign Contributions From Rupert Murdoch
(Like Hillary).
18. His Running Mate Most Likely Will Not Have Shot Anyone In The Face.
19. He Wants To End The I.R.S..
20. He Wants To Cut Spending?? Really, Cut Spending.
21. He Is Against Eminent Domain.
22. He Is Against The NAFTA Superhighway.
23. He Is Against The North American Union Or SPP (It Exists Google It).
24. He Is For The Principle Of Sound Money.
25. He Is Against The Idea of The Amero (Google It).
26. He Is Against The Federal Reserve’s Monopoly On Monetary Regulation.
27. He Is Philosophically Opposed To Big Government.
28. He Voted Against The Misnamed Patriot Act That Stripped Us Of Our Rights.
29. He Is For The Bill Of Rights.
30. He Knows The Meaning Of Liberty.
31. He Was 1 Of 4 People That Supported Reagan Early On.
32. He Has Been Married For 50 Years, Which Is An Achievement These Days.
33. He Is Not Married To Hillary.
34. His Supporters Love Him.
35. He Is A Once In A Lifetime Candidate.
36. Because His Record Is Consistent.
37. He Is Against Funding The So-Called War On Drugs (Another Unsuccessful War).
38. He Is Actually Against Funding Many Unsuccessful Federal Programs.
39. He Does Not Want To Ruin Healthcare By Nationalizing It, (LikeHillary, Obama, et al.)
40. He Is A Student Of History.
41. He Votes In Accordance With The Constitution.
42. He Will Not Forcibly Implant Us Or Our Troops With Microchips Or Like Devices (It’s For Your Safety, Of Course).
43. He Is The Only Conservative, In The Traditional Sense, Left.
44. Republicans Love Him Because He Is For Small Government.
45. Democrats Love Him Because He Will End The War For Oil.
46. Libertarians Love Him Because He Wants The Government Out Of Their Business.
47. He Is The Only Electable Republican Candidate.
48. He is Against The Creation Of A Surveillance Society (See London).
49. He Supports Homeschool Rights.
50. He Wants To End The Corporate Welfare System That Is Destroying Our Government’s Credibility.
51. He Tells It Like It Is. He Is Truthful.
52. He Reads.
53. As A Doctor, He Is Informed On The Healthcare Issue.
54. He Has Not Been Hannitized.
55. He Has The Courage To Speak Out Against What Is Wrong.
56. He Will Be Good For The Economy (Freedom Generally Is Good For The Economy).
57. He Wants Us Out Of The WTO And Like Organizations.
58. The I.R.S. Is Scared Of This Guy.
59. He Is Smart Enough To Prefer Gold Over Paper.
60. He Knows The Term FIAT-CURRENCY and knows what it means.
61. He Wants To Secure Our Borders.
62. He Favors Guarding Our Country Over Policing The World.
63. He Opposed The War In Iraq From The Beginning.
64. He Authorized The Hunt For Osama Bin Laden.
65. He Believes Local Governments Are Better Suited To Handle Their Own Issues.
66. He Is Willing To Listen And Reason With Others.
67. He Is A Christian Who Believes Christ Was Right When He Said, “Blessed Are The Peacemakers”.
68. He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
69. He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
70. He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
71. He has never taken a government-paid junket.
72. He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
73. He voted against regulating the Internet.
74. He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
75. He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to
the U.S. treasury every year.
76. He Is Against Selective Service Registration.
77. He Is Against A Mandatory Draft.
78. He Is Still Not Married To Hillary.
79. He Has The Support Of The Youth.
80. His Campaign Has People Across The Country Motivated.
81. His Supporters Are Enthusiastic.
82. He Is Educated.
83. He Wants To Apply The Golden Rule In Government (How Radical).
84. He Believes in Freedom Of Speech.
85. He Believes In Individual Rights
86. He Believes Those Rights Come From Our Creator.
87. He Does Not “Move With The Herd”.
88. He Has Delivered Over 4,000 Babies And Values Life.
89. He Doesn’t Have To “Act The Part” Because He Is What He Is.
90. He Has Not Waffled On The Abortion Issue As Every Other Republican Candidate.
91. He Has Faced Tremendous Opposition With Dignity.
92. He Is Optimistic
93. He Values The Traditions That Have Kept Us Free.
94. He Understands That Monopolies Are Bad Things.
95. He Understands The Difference Between Individual And Government Responsibility.
96. He Understands Inflation Is Not Just The Prices Going Up, But Rather The Value Of Money Going Down.
97. You Will Feel Good About Your Vote For A Change.
98. You Will Know You Have Done The Right Thing.
99. For The First Time In A Long Time, You Will Not Be Voting “For The Least Worst”.
100. You Will Help Undo The Damage Done To Our Country Over The Last
Several Decades.
101. He Is Our Last Hope For A Free Nation.


15 posted on 08/26/2007 9:19:40 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I don’t know if Ron Paul can win, I do think that we are much better off with an Internet presence then with our old methods of reaching voters.

I would bet that Paul supporters are the most enthusisastic about supporting him.


16 posted on 08/26/2007 9:20:37 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul


17 posted on 08/26/2007 9:21:58 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

>>quiz him on everything from foreign policy to the Federal Reserve’s intervention in the jittery financial markets.<<

I wonder what he said about the Fed.


18 posted on 08/26/2007 9:23:08 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

In before the keyword vandals BUMP!;^)


19 posted on 08/26/2007 9:29:08 AM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
101. He Is Our Last Hope For A Free Nation.

Nope.

20 posted on 08/26/2007 9:30:03 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

Your choice is .....?


21 posted on 08/26/2007 10:18:16 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

My choice of what?

If you mean choice for President, I’d vote for Paul or not at all.


22 posted on 08/26/2007 10:39:38 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

I’d like to see Paul with Hunter as VP or vice versa. I think Fred T would be great as Sec of State. Communists around the world would be needing diapers 24/7.


23 posted on 08/26/2007 11:11:31 AM PDT by B4Ranch ("Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

So did Deans. And we’ve all seen where it got him...


24 posted on 08/26/2007 11:13:06 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

So did Deans. And we’ve all seen where it got him...


25 posted on 08/26/2007 11:13:13 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"I think Fred T would be great as Sec of State. Communists around the world would be needing diapers 24/7."

Fred T is an interventionist, R Paul is not. Fred T supported the 1999 NATO Bombing of Yugoslavia. Ron Paul led a coalition who actually sued Clinton over it. Not likely a compatible mix.

26 posted on 08/26/2007 1:15:14 PM PDT by Bokababe ( http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Ron Paul’s campaign buzz resonates on Internet”

And Nowhere else. That matters. Of course that makes him no different that Hunter, Tancredo or John Cox.


27 posted on 08/26/2007 1:16:30 PM PDT by Grunthor (When life gives you lemons, you throw them at the mean people and hope it gets them in the eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

“He’s probably leading and we just don’t know it, I guess.”

Most likely by thirty or forty percentage points, LOL!


28 posted on 08/26/2007 1:18:09 PM PDT by Grunthor (When life gives you lemons, you throw them at the mean people and hope it gets them in the eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Ron Paul is the custom-made candidate to take advantage of the current political climate. Conservative issue-voters are most exasperated with the Republican unwillingness to actually be conservative, despite having the most favorable balance of power in government since McKinley was shot.

The 1994 agenda could have been back in play if our incumbents weren't only interested in business-as-usual. That's why Paul looks so good. I hope he goes all the way.

29 posted on 08/27/2007 4:16:55 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Did any of the Paulbots bother to ask him to explain this politics as usual position of his on earmarks?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292334,00.html

Ron Paul’s $400 Million Earmarks

Seems Paul is a faurd. A demagouge who merely spews nice sounding retoric while being just another good old boy politican.


30 posted on 08/30/2007 8:50:42 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Dr. Paul commented on earmarks here.

Earmark Victory May Be a Hollow One

by Ron Paul

Last week's big battle on the House floor over earmarks in the annual appropriations bills was won by Republicans, who succeeded in getting the Democratic leadership to agree to clearly identify each earmark in the future. While this is certainly a victory for more transparency and openness in the spending process, and as such should be applauded, I am concerned that this may not necessarily be a victory for those of us who want a smaller federal government.

Though much attention is focused on the notorious abuses of earmarking, and there are plenty of examples, in fact even if all earmarks were eliminated we would not necessarily save a single penny in the federal budget. Because earmarks are funded from spending levels that have been determined before a single earmark is agreed to, with or without earmarks the spending levels remain the same. Eliminating earmarks designated by Members of Congress would simply transfer the funding decision process to federal bureaucrats rather then elected representatives. In an already flawed system, earmarks can at least allow residents of Congressional districts to have a greater role in allocating federal funds – their tax dollars – than if the money is allocated behind locked doors by bureaucrats. So we can be critical of the abuses in the current system but we shouldn't lose sight of how some reforms may not actually make the system much better.

The real problem, and one that was unfortunately not addressed in last week's earmark dispute, is the size of the federal government and the amount of money we are spending in these appropriations bills. Even cutting a few thousand or even a million dollars from a multi-hundred-billion dollar appropriation bill will not really shrink the size of government.

So there is a danger that small-government conservatives will look at this small victory for transparency and forget the much larger and more difficult battle of returning the United States government to spending levels more in line with its constitutional functions. Without taking a serious look at the actual total spending in these appropriations bills, we will miss the real threat to our economic security. Failed government agencies like FEMA will still get tens of billions of dollars to mismanage when the next disaster strikes. Corrupt foreign governments will still be lavishly funded with dollars taken from working Americans to prop up their regimes. The United Nations will still receive its generous annual tribute taken from the American taxpayer. Americans will still be forced to pay for elaborate military bases to protect borders overseas while our own borders remain porous and unguarded. These are the real issues we must address when we look at reforming our yearly spending extravaganza called the appropriations season.

So we need to focus on the longer-term and more difficult task of reducing the total size of the federal budget and the federal government and to return government to its constitutional functions. We should not confuse this welcome victory for transparency in the earmarking process with a victory in our long-term goal of this reduction in government taxing and spending.

31 posted on 08/31/2007 3:18:00 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Your mention of 1994 reminds me how great the Contract with America was. In 2008, Republicans should have a similar set of promises. It should state that, if a republican president is elected and Republicans win majorities in both houses of Congress, they would pass a set of five bills. Here are some suggestions:

1. Each state should take care of the welfare needs of its residents. It’s unfair that federal tax money is sent, from states with low poverty rates, to Washington DC, where it’s redistributed and sent, in welfare payments, to states with high poverty rates. Congress should eliminate HUD, food stamps, unemployment benefits, and TANF. This would save about $150 billion per year.
2. The above law would save 8% of the budget, so Congress would pass an across-the-board 8% tax rate reduction.
3. Each bill will only have one subject. That would save money because no senator or representative could add unrelated unconstitutional pork barrel spending at the end of a bill.
4. A baby who is born in the U.S. may become a U.S. citizen only his or her parents prove that at least one of the child’s parents are in the U.S. legally.

Do you have any suggestions?


32 posted on 08/31/2007 7:14:23 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson