Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Backer Aims to Snag Travelers (full page US today Ad)
US News World Report ^ | 11/20/07 | Liz Halloran

Posted on 11/21/2007 9:51:02 AM PST by traviskicks

Larry Lepard, a venture capitalist and Ron Paul supporter from Massachusetts, has shelled out about $85,000 of his own money to throw what he told U.S. News is a "small hard rock at a good target": a full-page ad supporting Paul that will run in tomorrow's edition of USA Today—the nation's largest circulation daily newspaper—on the busiest travel day of the year.

He noted that he bought a right-hand position in the newspaper's front section.

"I'm trying to get maximum bang for the buck," said Lepard, 50, a Republican who says his strong opposition to the Iraq war drove him to take out the ad. His firm, Equity Management Association, invests in emerging markets, he said, adding, "I'm good at spotting early trends." The ad, presented as an open letter from the country's Founding Fathers, was designed with the help of supporters on www.RonPaulForums.com, where Paul campaign activists hold their virtual gatherings.

"We think the message is beautiful and pure," said Lepard, who first met Paul nearly two decades ago at an economic conference in New York. "He's not the odds-on favorite, but people have come from relative obscurity before and done it."


TOPICS: Candidates
KEYWORDS: ads; marines; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
The full page Ad:





This reminds me a bit of this full page ad taken out in the Washington Post during october of 2004.

What I am by George Esseff ( his cost = $104,655.60)

1 posted on 11/21/2007 9:51:04 AM PST by traviskicks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2 posted on 11/21/2007 9:51:42 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

ping


3 posted on 11/21/2007 9:52:20 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Both Paul and Huckabee are surging in the polls. In each case, this is a good thing. Huck has a good chance of taking down Romney. As Thompson falls in the polls, Paul will increasingly be the most viable limited government choice.


4 posted on 11/21/2007 9:55:32 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I’m afraid that ad is too much for the “thinker”. I’m not sure most people will really take the time to read and understand it. On the other hand, they are taking the time to read a newspaper in the first place.


5 posted on 11/21/2007 9:58:24 AM PST by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I can’t find the point (in the ad) about Paul saying that 9/11 was our fault.

Why is that?

(sarcasm)


6 posted on 11/21/2007 9:58:33 AM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Another advantage of Huck’s rise for Paul is that Romney will have to divert resources from New Hampshire (a state where Paul is especially strong).


7 posted on 11/21/2007 9:58:58 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

No...the guy who said 911 was our fault was Pat Robertson and he is supporting Rudy (who proudly embraces this support).


8 posted on 11/21/2007 9:59:56 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

That’s actually a very well made ad. Too bad that Ron Paul thinks he’s worthy company of those great men, though.

Where’s the part about how Ron Paul thinks we should let terrorists strike first with a nuclear weapon? Or let tens of thousands die from a nerve gas strike?

Must be a simple oversight.


9 posted on 11/21/2007 10:03:18 AM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Where’s the part where I get a free cookie?


10 posted on 11/21/2007 10:04:26 AM PST by CougarGA7 (I'm supporting a Conservative not a RINO http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Ron Paul for the WIN! For Freedom and Liberty.


11 posted on 11/21/2007 10:06:38 AM PST by xrp (Republicans Message: Vote for us, we suck less than Democrats. (that's pretty bad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Great advert. The least I hope for is that this sort of grassroots activity will help popularize the concepts of liberty and limited government.


12 posted on 11/21/2007 10:07:20 AM PST by M203M4 (Rudy Giuliani 2008 - finally get all of the government you are paying for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Not so. Ron Paul says 9/11 was just the work of "19 thugs," and views it as mere "air piracy," kind of like D.B. Cooper's crime, I guess. He also thinks we started the whole problem by putting our military into the ummaof the Religion of Peace. Before that, the Muzzies were gentle, mild people, somewhat like Mr. Rogers.
13 posted on 11/21/2007 10:11:10 AM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Anyone who thinks that islamic fascism isn’t a threat to national security and needs to be confronted by our Military forces is a fool. Thomas Jefferson certainly confronted it and he was one of the “Founding Fathers” Ron Paul likes to bring up all the time.


14 posted on 11/21/2007 10:13:16 AM PST by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Please help me follow your reasoning: you are cheering a Big Government “conservative’s” (Huckabee) rise in the polls because it makes your Small Government candidate more attractive?


15 posted on 11/21/2007 10:15:02 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

Hmmmm......Rudy’s guy says it was our fault because we are sinners. Rudy blames it on specific bad guys. I think Paul has a better explanation.


16 posted on 11/21/2007 10:15:13 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Huckabee scares me even more than Romney, I’m loosing more and more respect for so-called ‘evangelical’ ‘social conservative’ voters; they’d apparently destroy the economy and advance socialism just cuz someone was once a minister and is strong on social issues.


17 posted on 11/21/2007 10:20:52 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
"The least I hope for is that this sort of grassroots activity will help popularize the concepts of liberty and limited government."

That would be a good start.

Carolyn

18 posted on 11/21/2007 10:21:42 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

But as far as a political strategy, yea what you say may hold true, I don’t know. The race is completely up in the air at this point I think.


19 posted on 11/21/2007 10:22:24 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Please help me follow your reasoning: you are cheering a Big Government “conservative’s” (Huckabee) rise in the polls because it makes your Small Government candidate more attractive?

A simple matter of math. Huck's rise further splits the base of the pro-war candidates, and to a lesser extent, anti-liberty candidates. This leaves Paul alone as a uniquely different choice. A fragmented field provides the best opportunity for Paul to get coverage and serious attention because it makes it more difficult for the media and voters to dismiss him as bottom tier. It is now almost impossible to cut him out of the debates on that rationale.

Because Paul is leading Thompson and/or is tied with with McCain in several states, he increasingly has claim to the top tier. In fact, now the only truly bottom tier candidates are Tancredo and Hunter.

20 posted on 11/21/2007 10:23:14 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk; Toddsterpatriot

I see why others were cheering Huckabee on a few days ago. It’s a sort of Mutually Assured Destruction thing.


21 posted on 11/21/2007 10:24:28 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

* Together we CAN change the world! *

Well, at least that part is believable.

ElRon’s dogmatic isolationism might change the world, all right. The United States very well might become a smoking nuclear crater, with what’s left ruled by Russia, China and Iran.

Oh boy. Three cheers for Elron.


22 posted on 11/21/2007 10:25:48 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Have you heard anything about a Dec 16th “Tea Party” in Strasbourg (at the European Parliament) being planned to protest excessive taxation and the loss of sovereignty under the EU?


23 posted on 11/21/2007 10:28:12 AM PST by M203M4 (Rudy Giuliani 2008 - finally get all of the government you are paying for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Because of Huck’s rise, Romney seems to be totally frustrated and is getting desperate to stop the hemoraging. He just tacked back to the left by calling for 100 percent mandated insurance. I am glad that this is forcing him to show his true colors and expose the lie that he is for limited government.


24 posted on 11/21/2007 10:29:53 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Nice post, great ad.


25 posted on 11/21/2007 10:29:54 AM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Paulistinian logic is very similar to paleo logic.
26 posted on 11/21/2007 10:31:18 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

‘I can’t find the point (in the ad) about Paul saying that 9/11 was our fault.

Why is that?’

(chuckle)


27 posted on 11/21/2007 10:36:11 AM PST by Badeye (That Karma thing keeps coming around, eh Sally? (chuckle))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

I just don’t see it as being a dominant strategy (in the game theory sense). It’s far too early for the Paul supporters to assume this will help their candidate.


28 posted on 11/21/2007 10:36:14 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

DIdn’t know if you read this one or not.


29 posted on 11/21/2007 10:36:56 AM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
Let me see,

As President he need Congress' assistance to keep such promises...Ain't going to happen
Isolationism, never worked, never will...Ain't going to happen
Becoming President...Ain't going to happen

Watching the Paul-bots eating crow next year...Priceless.


30 posted on 11/21/2007 10:38:52 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7
Where’s the part where I get a free cookie?

LOL! Killin' me...

31 posted on 11/21/2007 10:39:47 AM PST by FightforFreedomCA (Fred Storm Rising - Thompson in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Captain Kirk

” just don’t see it as being a dominant strategy (in the game theory sense). It’s far too early for the Paul supporters to assume this will help their candidate.”

Agree with you 1RB, and I don’t think Paul’s guys are eyeing it as much as Rudy, Thompson, Mitt and McCains guys are looking at this.

As Huck goes up, someone has to come down. In doing so, voters are going to split their candidates. I noticed on some earlier post that some Thompson guys are throwing in the towel and picking Mitt. By no means do I think they are Freepers, it was just the articles being posted.

Not good to be throwing in the towel before one vote has been cast so early in the game.


32 posted on 11/21/2007 10:42:39 AM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Could you tell me why you are against military action against Islamofacists? That’s a sincere question.


33 posted on 11/21/2007 10:43:46 AM PST by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FightforFreedomCA

I aim to please.....and I really want a cookie.


34 posted on 11/21/2007 10:46:44 AM PST by CougarGA7 (I'm supporting a Conservative not a RINO http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
???? Travelers = Fellow Marxists? ...Has RP, has gone crazy...
35 posted on 11/21/2007 10:49:41 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Paul has spit on the vets of Korea, the vets of Vietnam, and the vets of Iraq by telling them their sacrifice was meaningless and unconstitutional.

As a Paul supporter, is that your position as well?


36 posted on 11/21/2007 11:04:19 AM PST by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
www.spreadtheword2008.com
37 posted on 11/21/2007 11:06:21 AM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

“dogmatic isolationism”

What’s that, any policy that doesn’t commit US troops to endless warfare in the Middle East?

Nice smear, but Ron Paul is actually suggesting that the US act to protect US interests. What a radical concept!

And no, it doesn’t mean sitting back if directly attacked.


38 posted on 11/21/2007 11:06:26 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

>> What’s that, any policy that doesn’t commit US troops to endless warfare in the Middle East?

No, “dogmatic isolationism” is ElRon’s policy of sticking his head up his arse and waiting for the incoming missiles.

>> Nice smear

Thanks for the kind words! But it’s not a smear, it’s the truth. And, anyway, ElRon provides the material, I just point it out.

>> it doesn’t mean sitting back if directly attacked.

No, I’m sure that WHEN we’re attacked (because we CERTAINLY WILL BE with ElRon as POTUS), the little popcorn fart will get all indignant and immediately send some buccaneer ships armed with marques of reprisal off towards the horizon. The only (!) problem with that is, in this day and age waiting until we’re attacked will be TOO LATE.


39 posted on 11/21/2007 11:19:42 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

And how can you be attacked, when W is doing such an effective job of sealing the southern border?

/sarc


40 posted on 11/21/2007 11:28:53 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative; Nervous Tick

Since you mentioned borders, did you guys read the latest post on Irving Texas?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1928970/posts


41 posted on 11/21/2007 11:33:45 AM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Apparently, the vets want to be “spit” on. Paul has received more money from them than any other candidate. Are you calling the Vets, who have already voted with their dollars, fools?


42 posted on 11/21/2007 11:50:10 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

No, it is a loaded action and based on an untrue premise. I supported the Afghan war.


43 posted on 11/21/2007 11:51:50 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

>> And how can you be attacked, when W is doing such an effective job of sealing the southern border?

The typical (il)logic of the typical ElRon supporter.

I don’t recall mentioning support of W at all, let alone his immigration policy.

They call that a straw man argument. By the way, it failed.


44 posted on 11/21/2007 11:53:35 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk; RedRover

>> Paul has received more money from them than any other candidate.

Another RonBot scam, debunked many times.

“affiliated with military” DOES NOT mean active duty soldiers.

My goodness. Can’t y’all support your candidate without lying, spamming, and scamming at every turn?

Nevermind: I’m sure the answer is a a simple, “No, we can’t; without our lies, his performance would be even more miserable than it already is.”


45 posted on 11/21/2007 12:00:25 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Paul has received more money from them than any other candidate.

This is not a slam against you. One thing I learned about campaign donation sites is that you can pretty much list any job you want to. I remember seeing so called local vets using their name and rank on John Kerry's campaign website. In the local phone book no such person lived at that address.


46 posted on 11/21/2007 12:03:08 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

I asked a specific question, and I guess I have my answer in a weasely way.

You think that the sacrifice of vets in the Korean, Vietnam, and Iraq wars is all meaningless. Just wanted to be sure what Paul’s supporters believe.


47 posted on 11/21/2007 12:16:45 PM PST by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: federal
Anyone who thinks that islamic fascism isn’t a threat to national security and needs to be confronted by our Military forces is a fool.

So your idea is to continue running our military ragged fighting patches of terrorists throughout the Middle East, while our borders remain open and Muslims are emigrating here & becoming more belligerent at our way of life.

I prefer the Paul approach. Let these people stay where they are & kill each other, get rid of the foreign aid boondoggles, and stop meddling in these medieval hell-holes.

48 posted on 11/21/2007 12:31:58 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Where’s the part about how Ron Paul thinks we should let terrorists strike first with a nuclear weapon? Or let tens of thousands die from a nerve gas strike?

Let me know when you find the BS where he says this.

49 posted on 11/21/2007 12:33:01 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

ping


50 posted on 11/21/2007 12:44:59 PM PST by SittinYonder (Ic ■Št gehate, ■Št ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille fur­or gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson