Posted on 12/03/2007 11:37:07 AM PST by BGHater
I am forced, kicking and screaming, to agree with what he says.
See, if he would emphasize these positions instead of working on getting contributions from the anti-war moonbat wing of the Democratic Party, he’d be doing even better than he is now. But for whatever reason, he’s decided that he’s going to be Moonbat-in-Chief with his anti-war rhetoric.
}:-)4
Paul has very valid points about limiting the scope and role of government in our lives as well as on immigration.
Too bad he’s off the reservation on other important stuff.
Ronald Ernest Paul, old hippie, Free Sex, Free Drugs
and free Huey! ( Dewey and Louie too).:)
Here is his theme song.
Shrimp boats is a-comin, their pork is in sight.
Shrimp boats is a-comin, they will be druggies tonight.
DH would make a fine President.
Here is Paul's problem in a nut shell. He make sense for a paragraph or two then loses control and starts screaming insanely stupid garbage like the above.
It is this sort of wholly fraudulent, rabidly stupid demagoguery that not only disqualifies Paul to be CIC, it disqualifies him to be a Congresscritter. He simply is far too bio polar to be in an position of political power.
The problem with Ron Paul and illegal immigration is that until now he’s never really done anything to combat it. He voted against putting the military on the border and through the years his only solution has been ‘end welfare’.
Don’t forget Ron has never gotten one piece of his legislation through congress, and he never offered much in the way of immigration.
Now if he would get a clue on iraq (or atleast show that he knows what’s really going on there) then he would be doing a lot better in the polls.
So you're saying that it's NOT outrageous that we're guarding Iraq's borders better than our own?
I agree with you. If he stuck to his guns on this he might have a chance. I see more and more support going his way. As I’ve said before “We can’t send all the illegals home.............until we start.” But....there’s too much money following them around. Follow the money and you’ll understand why Congress or the President hasn’t done anything. Also look to the NAU idea.
“Simply being born on US soil to illegal immigrant parents should not trigger automatic citizenship. This encourages many dangerous behaviors and there are many unintended consequences as a result of this blanket policy. I am against amnesty and I have introduced an amendment to the Constitution (H.J. Res 46) which will end this form of amnesty.”
Ron Paul is the only candidate to have done something concrete (introducing legislation) to do away with the anchor baby outrage.
Actually not, Tancredo and Hunter have both proposed bills on this as well.
ping
Ron Paul is far from the only Congressman to introduce such legislation.
That plus the fact that neither of them are anti-war moonbats are some of the things that make them real conservatives.
It is an outrage that our best trained border guards are sent to Iraq instead of guarding our borders.
Try this: http://www.cbp.gov/xp/CustomsToday/2005/March/other/iraq_training.xml
Or this, though I am sure since Bob Barr joined the ACLU he is now a heathen in your eyes:
Bob Barr
We Can't Secure Our Borders, but Iraq's Borders Get Priority
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
May 30, 2007
Check it out at Numbers USA.
Don't bother giving me the Constitution argument on this. The fact is that Paul won't defend America abroad and he won't defend her at home either.
On this issue Ron Paul is not wrong, or nuttier than a squirrel turd.
On this issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.