Posted on 01/27/2008 10:29:01 AM PST by jdm
“You should be embarrassed “
You should MYOB
It does not take “balls” to say something that no one hears.
“... but people do not want to hear about tomorrow’s problems.”
Including many Freeper, who mostly identify themselves as conservatives. They are nothing of the kind, and prove this by using the DU-like responses to the issues. Is it any wonder that the Republican party is in shambles?
I think it’s very balanced as they’re nearly identical.
Your “globalist traitors” remark says a lot about you, and it ain’t good.
It did that years ago. It was 4 trillion in the 80s. Now it’s 48 trillion.
You got that right, brother. When “conservative” are no longer conservative, it is moot to discuss a resurgence of conservatism. Vote for your pocketbook and load up on ammunition, the American Experiment is coming to a painful conclusion.
I disagree. I think that Ron Paul is a joke. And like many jokes, there’s a lot of mileage left in them. That’s why he keeps getting the treatment he gets. When he goes (oh please, oh please, pretty please), we’ll move on to something else the lunatic-RonPaul-fringe brings to the table.
And therein lays the problems, we have gotten scattered with each viewpoint looking out only for their own interests.
Unfortuantely, if we do not get our “merde’” straight, it will be the Clinton Coronation in 2009, make no mistake that will happen just by looking at the turnout numbers from the primaries.
Obama got TWICE the votes that John F Kerry did in SC, and that is even excluding the votes Hilde and the Silken Pony received..
There were 200,000 more Democrats who voted in SC then there were Republicans, same story in MI as well.
If we want Shamnesty and massive tax increases and National Healthcare, let us just continue to eat our own...
Size of the Budget is almost 3 trillion, the Debt and Deficit is that the 48 trillion number?
Either way, add in State and Country and Muncipality Taxes and we are heading for a calamity of Taxes if “We” do not change our policies and spending habits.
Re-read post #32.
Most of the Paul supporters are people who never cared about politics before. They come from all walks of life. Are you really going to call these people "nutjobs," when for years FR used to complain about people not taking part in the political process (the sheeple)?
When the general election rolls around and the GOP nominee loses because it alienated Paul and his supporters, don't come crying to me.
Indoor plumbing, electricity, t.v., internet, air travel, cars, cell phones; there's never been, in the history of the world, such a pampered society as we have built for ourselves; and to think we did it with the Federal Reserve.
That Americans today would value such crap is a sign of decadence and decay.
Look around you, at what such pampering has done to the attitudes of Americans.
Our moral, mental, and physical vitality are sapped by such idiotic contrivances.
Stupid me. Obviously did not read everything. Sorry for my mistake.
You are right. We are definately headed in the wrong direction with taxes and just about everything else.
Bwahahahaha!!!
That’s hilarious! Also, a bit fascist: “destroy”, “neutralize” , “peril”. Have you or anyone else noticed that particular ugly vein running through most if not all the lunatic’s supporters?
No worries, the numbers run together after awhile, and Hilde wants even more spending?
Many things can be said about Ron Paul, “big spender on the Nanny State” is not one of them.
To Paul’s point about the Federal Reserve, at even a low 2% inflation rate, “we” are losing 2 dollars on every 100 dollars just like a hidden tax, we lose purchasing power and value.
No worries mate. I will not come crying to you. I promise....
It is amazing. These folks don't even try to argue against what he says. They just call him names. Well, Ron Paul is obscure, and he is not a good politician, and some of his positions are a bit out there, but he is still attracting a lot of support. Why? Is it the loonie wing of the Republican party that support him? I don't think so. I think he is supported because he is the one candidate who stands for genuine conservative principles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.