Replies

If Iran even made a move toward that we'd turn the entire country into glass. The Persians aren't stupid. No country will attack the United States.

As to terror groups like Al Queda, our tepid, insanely misdirected response to 9-11 only encouraged terror groups to launch more attacks. Instead of invading Iraq (which had nothing to do with 9-11), the much smarter policy after 9-11 would have been to meet terror with unspeakable terror. I mean kill all of the terrorists, kill their families, forcing them first to eat pork and sh*t on the Koran. Then nuke Mecca and nuke any Muslim city that dared to stage a public protest in response. Basically, kill them all and let God sort them out. Meet their terror with a terror so unspeakable that men centuries hence will wince to think of it. Respond with terror so horrific that Lenin himself would vomit at the thought.

They talk about how nobody can conquer Afganistan. But there was one guy who did it - Ghengis Khan and his Mongols. He did it by killing everybody, making mountains of skulls throughout all of Central Asia. Ghengis Khan left entire divisions of his horsemen behind so that they could hunt down the last starving child shivering in the rubble of the cities he destroyed. Terror. Thorough, unspeakable terror. That's what works.

So it can be done. I loved that line in Apocalypse Now - terror is either your friend or it is an enemy to be feared. If Bush II and his entourage of fools had any sort of balls at all (and we know that Bush II was a draft dodger, so he was not only an idiot but a gutless one at that) the response to 9-11 would have been so complete and so horrific that no Muslim would have dared to raise their eyes from the ground for generations hence.

But no, Sugar Foot had to don a white hat and proceed, checkbook in hand, to try to convert the Muslims to democracy.

What a fool.

And we're still paying for it.

As it is, we lack the stomach for meeting terror with terror, which is perceived (inevitably) as weakness by these spiritually stunted Muslim cultures. Instead of killing the terrorists and their families and genociding any village that dared to harbor one of them, we took the insane step of invading Iraq (which again had nothing to do with 9-11) and trying to convince a bunch of Muzzies that democwacy is a good thing, and likewise trying to bring a hopelessly backward place like Afghanistan into the modern world.

Mass, merciless retaliation (including nuclear bombs on Mecca and Medina) and religious terror were the sole proper responses to 9-11. It would have been cheap and effective. It would be over in a few weeks, and we would have used weapons that we have plenty of.

"Nation building" in Muslim countries could only be seriously considered by a drooling idiot. The Bush II administration was full of drooling idiots, which is why seven years later we're still spending billions and billions of dollars and losing precious American lives in two pointless, no-win wars WITH ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT.

Thanks for destroying our country, "conservatives."

Ron Paul is right. American foreign policy must be Fortress America. Live your lowly lives and you will, Muzzies. But if you attack us, our response will be so unimaginably horrific and so Tuetonically thorough that you will begin your calendar anew. Year one won't be Mohammed's Hejira, but the year of our response.