Skip to comments.Palin endorses Ron Paul's position on international militarism
Posted on 10/22/2011 5:09:11 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
Youve got to give it to Ron Paul," Palin said. "Whether you agree with everything he says or not, at least he is one there in Congress trying to make our President stick to the law and understand that Congress does have a role to play in these foreign policy decisions that are made and Ron Paul, I think hit the nail on the head, when he came out and said Obama had better be careful when he interjects himself and our country in other nations business.
(Excerpt) Read more at digitaljournal.com ...
Anyone know who she’s going to endorse for president? Best guess....?
I bump your SARAH bump!
I’d rather have her as a commentator. She’d both have and be more fun as one.
I did not agree and most don’t with RP when asked if we should support Israel - he said we shouldn’t support any nation. Well to American, Israel is NOT ‘any’ nation. Someone needs to straighten him out about that - not sure where his block is that he doesn’t get it.
From what I remember she’s not endorsing anyone in the primary which is smart.
I never listened to what RP had to say - and never thought of voting for him. I did listen to the last debate and he did say a few things I liked - so I’m happy to hear Sean invited him on.
No the one who should not be in the race is Mitt!
Guess what Chong, YOU do not get to decide what Sarah is or does - she does. And when she speaks, you will listen and the reason I know that is - here you are on a Palin thread.
Now you go ‘cheer’ somewhere else - when we want media propaganda - we know where to find you.
LOL Palin is not only dancing for the stars - she’d rather be one than finish her term as governor. She’s a woman who has a nice message but no guts. So, she doesn’t get any glory. It was her choice no matter what she says. She’s a quitter.
Few people do. I'm sorry to see her name linked to his: that opens her up to "bracketing" with Paul's isolationism.
Paul's idea of "listening" to jihadists is misplaced. In the first place, their mouths are their primary weapon, and they are reflexive liars.
Their real reason for attacking us is that they're all stoked on Qutb and other Salafists, and they hate us because we are successful and we are infidels. Period.
Sarah has more guts than a fiddle factory. You go out for brown bear and come back and tell me about it.
You're just abusing her with DU slurs.
1) When has Paul ever voted for any legislation related to our military?
2) The jihadists were LYING when they told us why they attacked us. They attacked us because it’s the next step toward their goal of world domination. Do you really not see that?
Oh, man, that is funny! She shoots a bear with a high powered rifle and suddenly she's a hero? Please....
That part about cutting Israel loose and muzzie terror being caused by our actions is ludicrous.
In one way, it could be our fault. Wilsonian self determination combined with our stupid energy policies sending them money IS part of the problem.
Islam has been at war with everyone for 1400 years. We put crescent moons on outhouse doors for reasons besides they look good.
Choosing to ignore history is stupid, whether due to PC or lack of teaching it in our schools. Google Charles Martel and the croissant for more info.
I haven’t even heard Rand approach the subject.