Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

APA Symposium Debates Whether Pedophilia, Gender-Identity Disorder...Should Remain Mental Illnesses
NARTH ^ | June 12, 2003 | Linda Ames Nicolosi

Posted on 06/22/2004 10:22:56 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
They are at a far higher risk of anal cancer, as compared to smokers.

What the.....BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

FMCDH(BITS)

21 posted on 06/22/2004 11:24:51 AM PDT by nothingnew (KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: agitator

Most psychiatric organizations lost all right to claim themsleves to be "credible" long ago. Most have been infiltrated with activists like the gay activists did to the American Psychiatric Association when they caused general disruption of their conventions before the APA caved into their agenda.

Even the pro-homosexual scientist Levay stated that it was clearly gay activism that caused the APA to "normalize" homosexuality in 1973.


22 posted on 06/22/2004 11:26:43 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

OK...Let me help.


Yes.


23 posted on 06/22/2004 11:27:52 AM PDT by sharktrager (George Clooney has rubber nipples.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
They are at a far higher risk of anal cancer, as compared to smokers.

This is a form of smoking that I totally unfamiliar with.....

24 posted on 06/22/2004 11:37:00 AM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
They are at a far higher risk of anal cancer, as compared to smokers.

I guess the risk is compounded for gay smokers.

25 posted on 06/22/2004 11:45:04 AM PDT by petercooper (Now, who's this Joe Mayo everyone's talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
give him a butcher knife rusty hacksaw blade & set the building on fire.
26 posted on 06/22/2004 11:45:14 AM PDT by OSHA (This is a loaner. My real tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tristam
Exactly what I was thinking. Declassify pedophilia. Let these scum rot in prison, in the general population. Why send them to psychiatric hospitals where they will all too soon be declared "cured"? As if there is a cure for this.

Actually, having pedophilias in the general population of a prison IS a cure. Once they're dead, they're cured.

27 posted on 06/22/2004 11:52:32 AM PDT by grellis (What's a rooster and mashed potatos have to do with being a pirate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
"Normalize" deviancy & you take a tool away from the judicial system.

Prisoners have their own "judicial system" when it comes to dealing with pedophiles.

28 posted on 06/22/2004 11:54:49 AM PDT by grellis (What's a rooster and mashed potatos have to do with being a pirate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ICX
They're not seeking to criminalize pedophilia - they're seeking to normalize it, just like they did with homosexuality....

Rape was a capital offense, and was punishable with death. We live in a society where there is no honor, only the need for self... (for definition, see Bill Clinton)!

29 posted on 06/22/2004 12:01:38 PM PDT by pageonetoo (Rights, what Rights'. You're kidding, right? This is Amerika!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn

Unfortunately, Shrek II is germane to this discussion. I have not seen it, but understand that it has some references to sexually deviant behavior as a source of humor.

The problem is that popular culture is where ideas become "normalized". Who would have thought 20 years ago that there would be umpteen network shows that included gay behavior as part of the plotline. Or, for that matter, the multiple sexual encounters of a bunch of women? Or that any reference to Jesus, other than as a swear word of course, would be come culturally unacceptable?

There are some interesting articles out there about the progression of ideas. If it were only an incidental reference in Shrek II, wouldn't be a problem, but trust me - that won't be where it ends.


30 posted on 06/22/2004 12:04:41 PM PDT by Wicket (God bless and protect our troops and God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; DCPatriot

Are these the folks that Pres. Bush wants to use to screen the rest of us for mental illness?


31 posted on 06/22/2004 12:10:12 PM PDT by Little Ray (John Ffing sKerry: Just a gigolo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
They are at a far higher risk of anal cancer, as compared to smokers.

If "anal smoking" is a problem for them, they should try more lubricant....

32 posted on 06/22/2004 12:12:57 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
Unfortunately, Shrek II is germane to this discussion.

I agree. Taken alone it means nothing, but as part of a bigger picture it means much more - a shift to legal and moral acceptance of deviant behavior. The supreme court, liberal federal courts, state supreme courts, and the teacher's unions, not to mention the pc/diversity industry crowd, are all to blame. Fortunately, nature is on our side (std's have a way of showing up if you have a lot of sex with a lot of different people).

33 posted on 06/22/2004 2:27:59 PM PDT by searchandrecovery (Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew

Bwahhahaha back at ya'.

The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. A michigan homosexual newspaper admits there is no such thing as "safe sex" to prevent this "soaring" cancer risk. Condoms only offer limited protection. (1)

1.Between the Lines "Anal Cancer and You". September 29, 2000


The risk of anal cancer for men who smoke increases by only 40%.

Who's laughing now? It sure isn't you.


34 posted on 06/22/2004 4:23:06 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
"This is a form of smoking that I am totally unfamiliar with" That's odd you would make a statement like that, you being a "brainiac" and all. Read about the rate of cancer risk soaring by nearly 4000% for men who have receptive anal intercourse(that I posted for another "brainiac".)
35 posted on 06/22/2004 4:26:12 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

It is compounded for gay smokers. Men who smoke increase their odds of getting anal cancer by nearly 40% compared to those men who do not smoke.

Homosexuals(who engage in receptive anal intercourse) increase their odds of getting anal cancer by nearly 4000%.


36 posted on 06/22/2004 4:28:27 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

"Anal smoking" isn't what is "smoking" their rear ends. Something else is. And it is increasing their odds of getting anal cancer by nearly 4000%.


37 posted on 06/22/2004 4:32:12 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Stillwaters

Oh, brother! ping.


38 posted on 06/22/2004 4:33:23 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Of course liberals believe people with fetishes and paraphillias are just misunderstood. So its no surprise the APA is debating to remove this stuff from the manual of mental disorders.


39 posted on 06/22/2004 4:36:25 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

...And the APA will probably "normalize" pedophilia, sexual-sadism, transvesticism along the same lines that they "normalized" homosexuality... or at least they will attempt to.

You can rest assured that they will at least attempt to.


40 posted on 06/22/2004 4:49:30 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson