Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft's Warning: Dirty Bomb

Posted on 10/30/2001 4:17:08 PM PST by DrCarl

Am I the only one who heard Sean Hannity, at about 5:40PM EST, stop while on the air and say: "So that's what Ashcroft's warning is. It's a dirty bomb."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dirtybomb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-320 next last

1 posted on 10/30/2001 4:17:08 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Good Post...........Splain Little More Please?
2 posted on 10/30/2001 4:18:36 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Ummm weve been talking about the same thing here for several hours.
3 posted on 10/30/2001 4:18:45 PM PST by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
No, DrCarl, you are not the only one. Sean said that FNC was reporting that the threat was a dirty bomb. The problem is where? When? How?
4 posted on 10/30/2001 4:20:49 PM PST by In mourning for six years
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
>Good Post...........Splain Little More Please?

That's it. At the time indicated above or thereabouts, Nationally boradcast conservative talk show host, Sean Hannnity was talking about the terrorist threat when suddenly he stopped as if he wass talking to soomeone else and said something to the effect of: "So that's it. What Ashcroft knows is that the threat is about a dirty bomb." Then it was not mentioned again.

5 posted on 10/30/2001 4:22:20 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lady GOP
>Ummm weve been talking about the same thing here for several hours.

Where's the thread. I looked for it and couldn't find it.

6 posted on 10/30/2001 4:23:43 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
What exactly is a "dirty bomb?"
7 posted on 10/30/2001 4:24:14 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Does anyone have any idea what a 'dirty bomb' is?
8 posted on 10/30/2001 4:24:32 PM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FUSSBALL
>What exactly is a "dirty bomb?"

Nuclear waste material wrapped in heavy explosives which, when detonated, will blow the waste material all over the place, killing thousands in a populated area like Manhattan.

It will also render a large piece of ground useless for a long time to come.

9 posted on 10/30/2001 4:26:20 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
My husband says it's a Nuclear Bomb with alot of fall-out, I'm sorry to tell you.

sw

10 posted on 10/30/2001 4:26:23 PM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
"Does anyone have any idea what a 'dirty bomb' is?"

A dirty bomb is a conventional bomb that is loaded with radioactive material that will spread throughout a relatively wide area via the explosion.

11 posted on 10/30/2001 4:26:52 PM PST by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Thank You Dr.Carl!
12 posted on 10/30/2001 4:28:13 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
I heard Carl Cameron on Fox News tell Brit Hume that there is good information from Argentina that nuclear material was smuggled through Bogata, Colombia and then across the Mexican border into the US. He said the most troublesome information has been gathered within the last 48 hours. I expect a 'dirty bomb' incident within the next 72 hours. Where will it be and what will you do? Weather patterns in the US generally move west to east. Get on the west side of any incident asap?
13 posted on 10/30/2001 4:28:16 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
It will also render a large piece of ground useless for a long time to come.

Not really all that long. Most likely no longer than a radioactive half-life of a mere 30,000 years.

14 posted on 10/30/2001 4:30:06 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clovis_Skeptic
Ping!
15 posted on 10/30/2001 4:30:30 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
A "dirty bomb" is made from a combination of conventional explosives and radioactive waste. It's sometimes called a "radiological dispersal" bomb. It does not have the ability to create a chain reaction a' la Hiroshima: Its primarily purpose is to disperse dangerous radioactive waste and thereby kill people by exposing them to toxic levels of radiation. Radioactive waste is pretty readily available since some countries pay the Third World to bury the stuff.
16 posted on 10/30/2001 4:30:53 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Yikes, sorry I saw this thread. Sometimes I think it is better to be in the dark so to speak. I long for the bomb shelters of the 60's.
17 posted on 10/30/2001 4:31:37 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'd expect a dirty bomb in LA or Dallas. Maybe somewhere in AZ. All close to Mexico border. Since I live in Dallas, it makes my knees weak thinking about it.
18 posted on 10/30/2001 4:31:58 PM PST by not-an-ostrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
I am going to opening night of the NBA, Laker game. I will certainly be keeping my eyes out...for middle-easternmen men and hot babes in Jerry Buss' box.

I am hoping this is not the 'dirty nuke' event planned. Back in a few hours!...

19 posted on 10/30/2001 4:32:00 PM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well, if it happens in NYC, I would think Southern New England (where I live) would be affected (as well as NYC, of course). But I guess it all depends on the prevailing winds at the time.

Let's hope it's a dirty bomb, and not a dirty nuke. From what I've read here at FR, a dirty nuke does damage in its own right, but ALSO disperses radioactive material. This would seem to be a far more serious weapon than a regular dirty bomb (e.g., one detonated with conventional explosives).

20 posted on 10/30/2001 4:32:06 PM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
>I expect a 'dirty bomb' incident within the next 72 hours

So do I, I'm afraid, and I live in NYC. Worse, so do my kids.

We need to kill these people. If this thing goes off, we need to end the war with all of our enemies in a day.

21 posted on 10/30/2001 4:32:12 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
so besides moving west? What else can one do? I know you guys and gals are a wealth of info...any websites or articles for this one?
22 posted on 10/30/2001 4:32:42 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Not really all that long. Most likely no longer than a radioactive half-life of a mere 30,000 years.

Yeah, but it depends on what and how much ground is exposed. As long as it doesn't seep into the water table, it's possible to remove the ground and bury it elsewhere.
23 posted on 10/30/2001 4:32:46 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
bump
24 posted on 10/30/2001 4:33:16 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
hmmmmmmmmmmm no wonder they arrested those 3 pakistanis microbiologist.....
25 posted on 10/30/2001 4:33:42 PM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
hmmmmmmmmmmm no wonder they arrested those 3 pakistanis microbiologist.....
26 posted on 10/30/2001 4:33:43 PM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
I mean nuclear scientist..
27 posted on 10/30/2001 4:34:09 PM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre
"My husband says it's a Nuclear Bomb with alot of fall-out, I'm sorry to tell you."

No! It is not a nuclear explosion. It is a conventional explosion with nuclear material attached. The conventional explosion is intended to disperse the radioactive material over a large area. Radioactive contamination is the intent, not to blow down buildings and such. Potassium iodide is an antidote for radiation poisoning. (I have learned most of this from fellow FReepers)

28 posted on 10/30/2001 4:34:47 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: not-an-ostrich
You could expect it anywhere. Almost any place in the US would be a strategic hit for one of these. I-35 up to Kansas City would wipe out Millions and (from what everyone says) Ruin a large portion of the US agriculture with it./
29 posted on 10/30/2001 4:35:36 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
and then across the Mexican border into the US.

So then where, LA, Denver, Vegas? Where do you make a big splash without dragging it across the whole country?

30 posted on 10/30/2001 4:36:05 PM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FUSSBALL
I'm thinking a lot of 3rd world despots have to be contemplating what the reaction will be for them, and I can tell them it will be measured in megatons. If they have any way at all to stop this, they can be a hero -- at least for awhile. If not, we can settle all scores at once.
31 posted on 10/30/2001 4:37:03 PM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
Another possibility is California's Silicon Valley, near Intel's main chip-manufactoring facility.

Radiation will ruin sensitive semiconductors, so contaminating the area will make semiconductor manufactoring impossible in the area for a while, plus ruining some of the most expensive real estate in America

32 posted on 10/30/2001 4:37:08 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam
ok dummo here


where can one find potassium iodide?

33 posted on 10/30/2001 4:37:23 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: not-an-ostrich
The bomb will be in the Heartland.

This is what they said ,isn't it?

34 posted on 10/30/2001 4:37:26 PM PST by auggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
FYI!
35 posted on 10/30/2001 4:38:01 PM PST by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Isaacs; right_to_defend
bump
36 posted on 10/30/2001 4:38:34 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
"We need to kill these people. If this thing goes off, we need to end the war with all of our enemies in a day."

That day should have been September 12th.

37 posted on 10/30/2001 4:40:06 PM PST by NewLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
fyi
38 posted on 10/30/2001 4:40:06 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Who do we thank again for NAFTA? I think we should drive this point home.
39 posted on 10/30/2001 4:41:17 PM PST by Constitutional Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Such a weapon would of necessity weigh a great deal and would not be intended as a small poisoning potential, hence, such a weapon would likely be transported and detonated from a boat or barge, or from a tractor-trailer box transport (shipping container). Large trucks should be prohibited from any route within ten miles of any major downtown, immediately.
40 posted on 10/30/2001 4:42:00 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
A dirty bomb is a bomb which hasn't been washed in Tide.
41 posted on 10/30/2001 4:42:03 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
"So do I, I'm afraid, and I live in NYC. Worse, so do my kids."

I'm thinking it will be in the west for two reasons:

* Moving from the Mexican border across the whole US gives a greater chance of getting caught.

* An explopsion in the west would spread radiation across a larger area of the US.

42 posted on 10/30/2001 4:42:09 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: not-an-ostrich
I'd expect a dirty bomb in LA or Dallas. Maybe somewhere in AZ.

So look at the upside. Even if a dirty bomb is set off on the West Coast as early as tonight, that still gives all the folks East of the Mississippi River more than enough time to celebrate Halloween tomorrow night before the radioactivity reaches us.

43 posted on 10/30/2001 4:43:09 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Constitutional Patriot
>Who do we thank again for NAFTA? I think we should drive this point home.

If all those drugs can come across our border with Mexico, nuclear waste material cann come across without with or without NAFTA too.

44 posted on 10/30/2001 4:43:17 PM PST by DrCarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BenF
fyi
45 posted on 10/30/2001 4:43:49 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In mourning for six years
"The problem is where? When? How?

Undoubtably in one of Blue Nation's failed megalopolises - and probably downtown during the business day or during rush hour.

That's easy to deduce strategically and tactically. A "Nasser nuke" (highly-radioactive junk surrounding conventional explosives to scatter it - an idea Germans were developing for Nasser) would not kill many if the target was, say, Saxapahaw, North Carolina. Only a place with lots of "people who matter" in a small area would create real emergency-response hassles - and preferably one very dependent on bridges and tunnels. And only by attacking some downtown business district with it would the permanently-uninhabitable real estate be any big loss; neither Saxapahaw nor Harlem would matter to the grandees of Blue Nation.

46 posted on 10/30/2001 4:44:04 PM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
So, further on this theory would mean the ROCKIES or east of the rockies. Doubt that it would get carried over them. The great plains man......wind goes on and on
47 posted on 10/30/2001 4:44:25 PM PST by FUSSBALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
Houston is only a few hours north of the Mexican border. My father lived there until only about six weeks ago (he's now in a residential care facility in California. Maybe 1 1/2 to 2 hours north of L.A.

Houston has Bush Intercontinental Airport, plus the Ship Channel, and lots of industry (I'm no Houston expert, but I believe it's the third or fourth most populous city in the U.S.)

48 posted on 10/30/2001 4:44:57 PM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DrCarl
Weeks ago I made a comment here about the danger of nuclear materials from hospital radiotherapy departments in relation to an Arab Radiology Resident who was temporarily arrested in Texas and then released.

Look at Arab doctors in this country.

SEND ALL MOSLEMS OUT OF THIS COUNTRY BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!!

49 posted on 10/30/2001 4:45:25 PM PST by imperator2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FUSSBALL
"What else can one do? "

That's about it. You will be advised about your level of exposure and if you need to take potassium iodide, the government has large stocks of PI. Do not take PI without being advised to do so.

50 posted on 10/30/2001 4:45:45 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-320 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson