if it's all the "clinton agenda", why are we still in the balkans?
The alternative to you being in the Balkans would be us being there, as the Brittish and the French would not be efficient at keeping the peace, nor protecting the population. You're only there to prevent us from having gone in, which would have given a number of those countries over there to cause a wider war in Europe - not something to be wished for.
posted on 11/01/2001 4:25:11 AM PST
To: a_Turk; zog
The agenda was not peace but energy corridors from points East to Europe. Control of energy corridors is what it is all about. Turkey is a 4th world nation and the last peace keeping mission they were in charge of was SOMALIA.
posted on 11/01/2001 5:46:48 AM PST
You're only there to prevent us from having gone in
In what capacity?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson