Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Danger Within: Militant Islam in America Commentary November 2001
www.danielpipes.org ^ | 11-02-2001 | Daniel Pip

Posted on 11/02/2001 3:49:15 AM PST by dtom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2001 3:49:15 AM PST by dtom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dtom
reference bump ...
2 posted on 11/02/2001 3:50:58 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dtom
Nothing could be greater," Al-Faruqi wrote in the early 1980's, "than this youthful, vigorous, and rich continent [of North America] turning away from its past evil and marching forward under the banner of Allahu Akbar [God is great]."

Pay attention!

3 posted on 11/02/2001 3:54:26 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Well with a generation of kids in this country being denied any discipline in their daily lives especially at home and in the schools and with Christianity being mocked at every turn in the road and especially by Holywood and the Media Islam presents a fertile ground for those wanting some order and meaning to their lives

Liberalism is killing this country
4 posted on 11/02/2001 4:03:07 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dtom
Thank you for posting this. Its a great read. Thanks again.
5 posted on 11/02/2001 4:29:29 AM PST by Pal10523
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dtom
This is a must-read. Muslims don't really hide their intentions for the US. If you read what they say, you can see they don't even deny that they intend for the US to become an Islamic country in the not-to-distant future. The difference between the extremist Muslims and the moderate Muslims isn't in the goal itself, the extremists are the ones willing to do the killing and suicide missions, the moderates are the ones planning to stay alive and run the government when this is done.
6 posted on 11/02/2001 4:36:53 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dtom
On the prior post of this article I noted what is perhaps the most significant point of the entire article.

Restricting or disallowing what others may do. Islamists want law-enforcement agencies to criminalize activities like drinking and gambling that are offensive to Islam. While seeking wide latitude for themselves, for instance when it comes to expressing disrespect for American national symbols, they would penalize expressions of disrespect for religious figures whom Islam deems holy, especially the prophet Muhammad; punish criticism of Islam, Islamism, or Islamists; and close down critical analysis of Islam.

It is direct response to this point that I am now proudly displaying my new bumper stickers

Mohammed was a child molestor
Factually true since Mohammed's favorite wife was nine years old when he "married her."

Mohammed is offspring of a diseased pig and a whore.
No this is not provably accurate but it is the most greviously offensive I could think of at the time to insult the religion. Though I normally would not insult anyone's religous beliefs, at this time i am specifically trying to goad a response that will identify violent Muslims. This one is a litmus test for Islam and their ability to get along in the USA. We have all seen numerous anti-Christian bumper stickers over the past years. It is my opinion that we need to show Muslims for what they are. If I am wrong about the expected response then I shall profoundly apologise but until then I shall wait for the attempt to censor me.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

7 posted on 11/02/2001 4:41:14 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dtom
"...Restricting or disallowing what others may do. Islamists
want law-enforcement agencies to criminalize activities like
drinking and gambling that are offensive to Islam. While
seeking wide latitude for themselves, for instance when it
comes to expressing disrespect for American national
symbols, they would penalize expressions of disrespect
for religious figures whom Islam deems holy, especially
the prophet Muhammad; punish criticism of Islam,
Islamism, or Islamists; and close down critical analysis
of Islam.
...."

 

Say, isn't that about the same agenda the "Religious Right"
has for America?

8 posted on 11/02/2001 4:53:29 AM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Desparate times call for desparate measures folks...these people can't take over anything without money. Refuse to spend your money at Arab-owned businesses or with businesses that hire them. The enemy we face has two faces, they smile and proclaim to support America when in reality they go to their place of worship and listen to rhetoric bashing America. It may seem unfair but we can't be sheep.
9 posted on 11/02/2001 5:13:34 AM PST by Cicero5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Maybe stick to the first sticker. Understatement is more powerful and efficient than overstatement. Seeing the obviously false claim of the second sticker many will doubt the truth of the first one. You can add that another that his was a bandit and a robber what is also true.
10 posted on 11/02/2001 5:13:41 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FITZ; N8VTXNinWV
the extremists are the ones willing to do the killing and suicide missions, the moderates are the ones planning to stay alive and run the government...

And that's why the moderates aren't saying a word about their extremist brethren, yet are the first ones in line to complain about the "profiling" of Muslims as Americans are on the lookout for more acts of terrorism by these very people. Quite telling. (If I recall correctly, two of the 9-11 hijacker/murderers had a red-white-and-blue heart on their apartment door reading "Welcome!" Yeah, said one neighbor, welcome to death's door.)

Ping for Lou!

11 posted on 11/02/2001 5:14:28 AM PST by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero5
these people can't take over anything without money. Refuse to spend your money at Arab-owned businesses or with businesses that hire them.

What about that oil money? We need to find alternatives to Arab oil very quickly.

12 posted on 11/02/2001 5:26:56 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
See this link for the true face of islam

true face of islam

13 posted on 11/02/2001 5:29:30 AM PST by dtom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Factually true since Mohammed's favorite wife was nine years old when he "married her."

She was only 6 years old when mohammed fell in love with her and married her. When she was 9, mohammed had first sex with her. Her name was Ayesha.

14 posted on 11/02/2001 5:31:59 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Improving the SUV
15 posted on 11/02/2001 5:34:22 AM PST by dtom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero5
Refuse to spend your money at Arab-owned businesses or with businesses that hire them.

You are barking at the wrong tree. Large part of Arabs in United States are Arab Christians who fled from Muslisms. They are the descendents of original Middle Eastern Arabs who were Christian before Muhhamad was even born. Some of them are Orthodox (like Greeks and Russians) some of them are Roman Catholic (like Lebanese Maronites who are in union with Rome).

16 posted on 11/02/2001 5:34:46 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
He waited 3 years! Nice of him.
17 posted on 11/02/2001 5:35:33 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dtom
Solution?

Internment? Deportation? Execution? Surveillance? Infilatration? Special Ops?

18 posted on 11/02/2001 5:37:38 AM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dtom
bumped for later bumping!!
19 posted on 11/02/2001 5:38:05 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples
speaking of internment

Political pressure for such relocation grew quickly. As the very liberal Walter Lippmann wrote in his national newspaper column on February 12, 1942: "It is a fact that the Japanese navy has been reconnoitering the Pacific Coast more or less continually and for a considerable period of time, testing and feeling out the American defenses. It is the fact that communication takes place between the enemy at sea and enemy agents on land. These are facts which we shall ignore or minimize at our peril?. The Pacific Coast is officially a combat zone: some part of it may at any moment be a battlefield. Nobody?s constitutional rights include the right to reside and do business on a battlefield."

MAGIC & Manzanar

20 posted on 11/02/2001 5:48:33 AM PST by dtom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson