Freedom From War- State Department Document 7277

Freedom From War- State Department Document 7277 ^ | 1961- Revised 21 times since 1961 | State Department

[DCE]

Please remember that in light of the news of President Bush telling Vladmir Putin he is cutting our Nuclear arsenal whether he cuts it or not is very bad. If you do a search on the State Department site, or just a normal search on MSN, you will find a document titled Freedom From War- State Department Document 7277- Blueprint for Peace.

People, I beg of you to read this. It has been revised 21 times and strengthened since 1961. It was originally read on the floor of the UN by JFK on 9/25/1962. This has not been stopped. If you wonder why the reductions are going on, or other strange things our occurring, just read this. I do not accept what a person tells me as fact. Only the document from the source will do. I can assure you also, that we are almost through the second stage mentioned in this document.

I am very sad that GW is going through with this document, as I had the misfortune of living in Fort Lauderdale the last two years, and voted for him. I did not like Gore, or the other Leftists that were running. I am really down about the FTAA agreement being carried through as well. Many of you do not know much about this, but in essence it takes all of the North American countries and makes them into a Free trade area exactly as you see in the EU. It will be called the OAS. You may do a search for this document by putting the Title "Words Into Deeds" into your search engine as well. The thing most disturbing about this among the other socialist garbage that runs through it, is the fact that the borders of all countries from Northern Canada to Costa Rica will come down. Cuba is the only country left out of this at this time. Why has this not been reversed in light of what is currently happening to our beloved country??

I have spent roughly the last 6 years reading many International treaties, and they take many hours. America, we are in serious trouble. Treaties that many of you will want to review are the Millenium Declaration, Our Global Neighborhood, Treaty on Reform, ICC Treaty from June 18th 1998 (Titled Plenipotentiary), and the Anti Gun treaties that are in existence since then.

The only way that I have been able to get through to people is by showing them the facts. These treaties are straight from www.un.org. I wish all the best, and God Bless All! If any of you need help in finding these, please email me, and I will provide the links etc.

[DCE]

THE TRUTH REALLY HURTS

[libertylady]

Thank you for posting this. With all of the hype about this so called war on terrorism no one is even noticing what is going on right under our noses.

Also, I have noticed that free republic has changed from a forum of free discussion to a shill and public relations site for our current administration no matter what unconstitution actions are taken on its watch. Has any one else noticed this?

I hope this wakes some freepers up.

Doesn't anyone here care that Bush is slashing our nukes even if Russia doesn't agree to do so. Does anyone care that many civil liberties are being taken away from us with this Patriots Bill on terrorism that either has already been passed or is to be passed. I am wondering why no one on this site has even posted anything about the freedoms we are losing under the Bush administration.

Did you know that Sneak and peak provision was put into the terrorism bill which means that your house can be searched without you being informed for 90 days?

Are these things suddenly OK since they are being done by republicans?

What happened to all of the constitutional bound people that used to post on this site? If Clinton were slashing our nukes and encouraging such anticonstitutional actions We'd hear about it all over this site.

Why is it that the Bush administration is getting away with this stuff? I am just curious. Please enlighten me.

[DCE]

Here is the site for you. Let me know your thoughts. Please share this information with as many people as you can. God Bless. http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

[philman_36]

Singing to the choir...Freedom from War, Dept.of State Publication 7277

What happened to all of the constitutional bound people that used to post on this site?
Maybe the implementation of HR 2975 and its vague definitions?

[DCE]

I appreciate your help. I have been telling all, and showing the documents too many. I even mass emailed it out. I am doing all that I can to get this information out there. We need this thread to run for a day.

[DCE]

I appreciate your help. We really need to get this out to the pub.

[philman_36]

We really need to get this out to the pub.
It has been out to the public for over a year through my post alone. It is only at FR, but it is out.
I did my part, the "pub" need to do their part too.
Just think...it took a year for you to get to the point I was already at. How long before the rest of the "pub" get it?
International treaties? Been there done that. FFW 7277? Been there done that too. You noted how few comments there were on the thread I created? The "pub" don't want to know! They would rather keep their heads in the sand!
Just because it is presented to them doesn't mean they have to look into it or even accept it, even when it is right in front of their face.
Nobody knows noses like Neosynephrin.

[Twodees]

The truth doesn't hurt the pompom shakers here because they refuse to look at it. Those of us who know about this situation with improperly ratified treaties and with international agreements which are being followed as though they're treaties when they aren't have gotten a little hoarse speaking up about them.

Thanks for reintroducing the subject.

[philman_36]

Day 2...no new comments after post #9.
Shall we keep a running daily totem on our sadly uninformed fellow Citizens?
Mayhaps more will become aware?

[philman_36]

A matched set?
Department of Peace proposed: HR2459
Freedom from War from the Department of Peace!

[ILoveFreedom&Liberty]

President Bush is nothing more than a NWO president. He will implement all the things that a Democrat would never get implemented. Peoples blind allegince to a Republican is what allows him to do this. Most will support whatever Bush Does. I was listening to Sean Hannity yesterday and he mentioned this, but had no other comment. If Clinton purposed doing this there would be clamor that would be deafening, but a Republican does it it is ok, there is such duplicity in this country. And the march toward a NWO continues unabetted. I wonder what Rush said about this? So many of the talk radio host are in my opinion paid opposition. They never really get to the heart of the problem because the word Conspiracy is forbidden but that is what is happening!

[philman_36]

I wonder what Rush said about this?
Evoking memories Mr. Ness of yore..."Untouchables".
As subject matters for discussion that is.
Too "divisive" and all you know...

[fourdeuce82d]

"Doesn't anyone here care that Bush is slashing our nukes even if Russia doesn't agree to do so"

No. Given that a .33 reduction will still leave us with about 3,200 warheads on land/sub based missiles, ang given that we are moving forward w/ missile defense, no, I'm not especially worried.

Given that the russians seem more interested in begging for handout than thundering across the Fulda gap, no, I'm not expecially worried.

Given that the heathen chinee have fewer than 50 ICBMS, no.

If drawing down some of our nuclear force give us Public Relations cover to deploy missile defense, *especially* theater weapons, I think it's a good idea.

[southern bale]

bump for later