[RobertBauman]

My family is now going to triple our giving to Salvation Army in order to fight back against the homosexuals. Also, if anyone is involved in law enforcement, isn't what these people are doing illegal? Their counterfeit money has some aspects very close to real currency and I believe the FBI is very strict on that. It would be pretty funny if this backfires against them and a lot of gays get busted. In any case, please support your local chapter of the Salvation Army since they had the guts to stand up against the PC homosexual agenda.

[The Raven]

Before the Boy Scouts...now the Salvation Army? What in the world???

Why can't they [gays] leave people alone?

[Kevin Curry]

The Salvation Army should cull the queer bills and donate them to a Bay Area AIDS prevention campaign (pick one, any one).

Phony money for feckless campaigns. It's a perfect fit.

[lara]

Unbelievable. I am giving so much more to the Salvation Army this year. I'll also tell my relative and friends.

[hsszionist]

War is War. Fight back by cutting off funding for their essential programs. Or Counterfeit Aids drugs which ever is permitted.

[Brewer]

Until now I have been troubled with who to donate to this year. Thanks to this article, I will be contributing to the Salvation Army.

[MistrX]

Petulant poofs.

[BellStar]

AOL hosting it! It figures.

[MotleyGirl70]

Fags

[RMrattlesnake]

Sodomites care less about the people who the salvation army serves. They care more about the sick orgies of sin then the people who suffer in this country.

[lavaroise]

So the salvation army cannot have its preferences but gays can... suuuuuuuuuure, at least the salvation army is not looking at whether someone is pretty or not, gays are (and so did the nazies obsess on physical features). Talk about who needs to repent. Sorry, the salvation army ain't the KKK and does not support racist people who "marry" solely for physical preferences.

[ChiMark]

War in AFGHANISTAN! Hell it's time to take up big time against these queer activists. These jerks are fighting against one of the finest charities. I wonder how the liberal media handles this. Absolutely evil! It's bad when you can be fired for saying Merry Christmas, but this is real facism. Thank you Billy boy!

[wingnuts'nbolts]

In light of the events that preceeded this Christmas I don't think the gay rights activists are going to get much punch out of this illegal scheme, and the public is going to be outraged.

It is a new climate now in our post TWC attack world. God, country, Flag and apple pie are in again and gay activists are out. Green activists are out too. So watch out, fringe mobs, we aren't in a mood to play anymore.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

If I am not mistaken, the money collected in the Red Kettles stays in the community. Ask them who they are hurting.....dumb sh*ts.

[mlocher]

homo's attack sa with counterfeit currency

does this not surprise anybody. counterfeit relationships, counterfeit religions, now counterfeit money.

i pray and hope that homosexuals come to know jesus.

[John Keefe II]

This was a letter I wrote to a gentleman of a site that promotes what I personally consider hatred and discrimination (though I recognize that others disagree). I wish to post this letter to this site, as it was a link to his own home page. I already know before even posting this that many people will undoubtedly disagree with what I have to say (I mean, come on, let's face it--this is a very conservative website and I am a liberal), but that is okay. I think that debate and healthy discussions are good. I shall provide you the link to Jim's site (the person through whom I found this site), and shall also provide you with the wbsite of another organization--one on the "left" that believes just the opposite. I hope that you enjoy them both! Jim's website (againsty gays): www.leavethekidsalone.com Steven Cozza's website (for diversity and acceptance): www.scoutingforall.org NOTE: The "letter format" changed when I posted "previewed" my post. Thus, you will be reading this as one big lump instead of a more easily-read "letter" format. Dear Jim: My name is John Patrick Keefe II. I have visited your site several times out of both interest and shock. I will certainly not fault you for expressing your own personal beliefs and values. Indeed, I believe that that right belongs to each and every human being on this earth. When many people make their decisions about life issues and what they hold dear, they often--but certainly not always--do so based upon either experience or empirical evidence (both of which, as it is with most human activities, can be wrong). I must assume that your whole basis for creating and maintaining this website stems forth from the former. While you and I in all likelihood grew up in very different home environments (as most--but not all--of my views are pretty liberal, I must say that the rationale upon which you base your views appears a bit faulty. Now, I could be wrong--and I have been wrong before--but I do not think I am in this particular case. Over the centuries the issue of sexual orientation--something people cannot simply "choose", has long remained a great topic of debate. In my humble opinion, gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgendered individuals have every right to enjoy the same quality of life as anyone else. Consider other minority groups that people have--and often still do--discriminate against: people of color, women, people of different nationalities, people with various religious creeds (and even those who do not even have one), handicap status, veteran status, because of an individual's age, weight, height, ethnic origin...The list goes on and on. What purpose does discriminating serve? You might consider giving that some serious thought. Let me ask you, Jim, at what point did you wake up and decide that you WANTED to be heterosexual? Of course, if the decision was yours, I would expect you to know the exact date, time, and the place you were when it happened. Another point to consider: If you want to bean count "Biblical sins", do not we as heterosexuals have a LOT more to worry about than gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgendered individuals (assuming I believed thatthe type of sexual behavior in which they engage constituted a sin)? What about divorce? What about adultery? What about fornication? Have you given thought to heterosexuals who practice polygamy? One thing that you will learn if you ever take the time to get to know someone who is gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, or transgendered is that those people do not merely focus on sexual activity. Indeed, they do not do so any more than do we as heterosexsuals! Unfortunately, you cannot possibly know that unless you try to let go of some of your fear, anxiety, and hatred and really take the time to get to know people who are different from you. If you are strongly determined to sexualize gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgendered individuals, then surely you must do the same to heterosexuals. How many 1-900 numbers exist? How many magazines with pictures of nude women and men are for sale? Personally, I think that whenever we see others merely as sex objects that we truly miss out on the other qualities those individuals possess--the lasting values. Try taking a look in the Book of Proverbs. Something else you might consider: Gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgendered individuals do not focus their sexual appetites on young children any more than do heterosexuals. In fact, most adults who conmmit sexual offenses may find absolutely no attraction to young boys, as many are attracted to young girls....But wait a minute--that does not technically classify them as "gay", does it? The truth of the matter is that most people who sexually molest children fall into one of the following categories: #1) They have a primary attraction toward either young boys or young girls, preferring a particular age and physical characteristics--though they may also find themselves slightly attracted to women or men (or both) their own age (fixated offfender of either gender); #2) They may have a sole attraction to young boys or girls, preferring a particular age and physical characteristics with no expressed interest in same or near-age members of either sex; or #3) They may hold a primary attraction toward one sex or the other, preferring same or near age partners--using children as a substitute sexual object (situational offenders). I could list a few other categories and have oversimlified a bit, but that is the GENERAL scope of it. Hey, here is something to consider: If gay menare "always" attracted to young boys, then why should we let adult women in the Scouting program? After all, are not females attracted to males? Are not most young memebers (keeping the Explorer posts in mind) not males? Thus, should we trust females? No, they are all probably in the program because they want to sexually molest chldren. Yeah, that is it! You might recall that the Boy Scouts of America currently discriminates against gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, transexuals, athiests (and this is admittedly a VERY LOOSE term), and girls. The BSA officials used to prevent women from volunteering until they finally saw that 1) it was a losing battle and 2) women had and continue to have so much to offer. Against whom will they discriminate next? Maybe you, Jim. Maybe you. I do not hate you, Jim. Like I said before--I respect your right to believe whatever it is you wish, and I am glad that you remain open to debate and discussion. I urge you to keep an open mind and an open heart. Do what you feel is right--even if others disagree (as long as what you do does not hurt others). Most importantly, remember to do unto others as you wouuld have them do unto you, to love thy neighbor as thyself, and to be as gentle with others as you possibly can. God bless, Jim. Sincerely, John Patrick Keefe II, B.A. Ed, MSW(s), Teacher and Social Worker

[ChadGore]

Boy scouts, SCOTUS and the Salvation Army.

Go ahead DNC, keep burning up votes.

[eaglewatch]

FIRST, ARA is NOT a "homosexual" group. ARA is just another extreme left-wing, anti-Christian, commie sack of $h-t that is using gays as an excuse to attack the Salvation Army.

READ the damn article! All of you posting your anti-gay crappola here are being too easily duped.

(Now, off to church.)

[LantzALot]

The Salvation Army recently rescinded their decision to offer health care benefits to domestic partners of its employees....

Now, how many gays can really be affected by this? I mean, it seem that the Salvation Army itself is just the type of organization they would avoid working for. I would suspect that "domestic partners" refers more to unwed hetero relationships. But then, like all shrieking leftist groups, they have found that the flimsiest accusation is enough to persuade the sheeple at large.

[openotherend]

The Salvation Army should have bio-hazard trash cans to dispose of the queer bills when they come in.

[unamused]

Homosexuals Attack Salvation Army with Counterfeit Currency

Fair enough...let's start funding AIDS research with counterfeit dollars...