Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia One Ups The United States
Toronto Sun ^ | 10/25/01 | By ERIC MARGOLIS

Posted on 11/25/2001 9:22:23 AM PST by Lucas1

Interesting Article

http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/margolis.html

In a dazzling coup, Russian President Vladimir Putin stole a march on the Bush administration, which was so busy trying to tear apart Afghanistan to find bin Laden it failed to notice the Russians were taking over half the country.

Comments on the whole article?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2001 9:22:23 AM PST by Lucas1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Lucas1
I guess the Russians Bombed the World Trade Center
4 posted on 11/25/2001 9:26:13 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
The way I see it, Bush and Putin agreed about this LONG ago, and the recent vacation on the Texas ranch was simply for small details and loose ends. I do not see where Bush wants a long heavy deep American involvement in Afghanistan. I think Bush is seriously about tracking down ALL terrorist cells on this planet, no matter the country.
5 posted on 11/25/2001 9:27:50 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
Maybe Putin tricked Bush. The NA was not supposed to take Kabul, after all, remember? The article makes sense.

And maybe the public, don't go into Kabul, was like Brer Rabbit saying Don't throw me in that briar patch. All is not as it seems.
Never take global politics at face value, especially when the US and Russia are the players.

7 posted on 11/25/2001 9:41:06 AM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lucas1
I always thought that that was Putin's paln. No surprise here. HE IS VERY SMART GUY!
8 posted on 11/25/2001 9:43:57 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Hi.

I truly thought that was INTENTIONAL DISINFORMATION.

In that way, al-Qaeda felt totally safe in Kabul, expecting fully to winter over in comfort. Days later, those who were still alive, fled to the hills.

The NA was ACCOMPANIED BY U.S. SPECIAL FORCES INTO KABUL.

9 posted on 11/25/2001 9:46:38 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
The world has ample oil today. But according to CIA estimates, when China and India reach South Korea's level of per capita energy use, within 30 years, their combined oil demand will be 120 million barrels daily.

This is like someone writing in 1880 predicting that future growth would cause a massive horse shortage.

10 posted on 11/25/2001 9:50:01 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
The article mixes fact with a great deal of speculation.

According to the authors’ logic, Bin Laden would be on our side, having fought with the CIA in the past.

I am constantly amazed at the “political geniuses” who think they have made a discovery that no one in this administration (Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc…) could have. This article starts with the assumption that President Bush is a greedy oil man, naïve, and not too bright.

11 posted on 11/25/2001 9:52:32 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Maybe the real Communists are in Washington D.C. !
12 posted on 11/25/2001 9:56:03 AM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
"This is like someone writing in 1880 predicting that future growth would cause a massive horse shortage."

Duh, horses are a renewable resource.

13 posted on 11/25/2001 10:00:34 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
What do we want with that forsaken land Afghanistan? It is the Russian Vietnam. We handed it over to them, we handed them victory which they could not achieve for 20 years. Why is the question.
15 posted on 11/25/2001 10:05:51 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
This article assumes that China will exist in 30 years.
19 posted on 11/25/2001 10:09:43 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
The point is that oil will be an obsolete energy source, like horses are an obsolete transportation source.

"Experts" have been predicting severe shortages of oil for decades. The problem with these predictions is they never factor in 1) increase efficiencies in oil use with technology over time, 2) new oil finds and 3) alternative energy sources.

20 posted on 11/25/2001 10:10:15 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
Then, where are they?
21 posted on 11/25/2001 10:11:31 AM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
And the fact that oil fields tend to refill themselves through geochemical processes. Forget the term "fossil fuel".
22 posted on 11/25/2001 10:11:53 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
They ran for the hills, and left their unburnt textbooks on terrorism behind, in their haste to flee. They were NOT expecting that Kabul would fall.
24 posted on 11/25/2001 10:14:18 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
By providing an essential product at inflated prices - due to the constant threat of the supply somehow running out. Or is your complaint with someone making money other than you on this? If so, welcome to the Democratic Party. When is the last time you were hired by a poor person?
26 posted on 11/25/2001 10:16:37 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meridia
I consider this "cutting edge" [cough!cough!] Canuck journalism to simply be par for the course for the HATE AMERICA Press, those stupid armchair generals who so recently were writing reams about the terrible American military strategy, and how the U.S. had met its second Viet Nam in Afghanistan [cough!cough!] and particularly how snide they were about our technological prowess and believed we had no humint. BASH-AMERICA is the journalistic norm, nowadays, and I feel that this article exemplifies the same.
27 posted on 11/25/2001 10:17:57 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Why would they run a pipeline in that direction? There are already plenty of ports along the coastline at the Arabian sea, the red sea, etc. Why not run it west through Russia and Turkey into the med?
28 posted on 11/25/2001 10:19:23 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
According to who - you?
30 posted on 11/25/2001 10:21:28 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Of course. Horsemen got rich in 1880 too, but they don't get rich now. The comment referred to the notion 30 years from now, if/when China and India join the western world's consumption levels.
31 posted on 11/25/2001 10:21:39 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
That's interesting. I didn't know that at all. Got any sources so I can learn more about it? "fossil fuel" is a misnomer then, or only part of the story...?
32 posted on 11/25/2001 10:24:27 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
It absolutely amazes me that every time there's a battle anywhere on earth, the left comes out and claims it's all about oil. You'd think they could come up with something new, but no, they pull out the same old bromides. LOL
33 posted on 11/25/2001 10:24:32 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
This is like someone writing in 1880 predicting that future growth would cause a massive horse shortage.

In today's regulatory environment, he would've been right.

34 posted on 11/25/2001 10:24:59 AM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Please don't be so SNIDE.

I view it as a FACT that the armchair generals wrote REAMS of c=r=a=p - all of it derogatory - about the U.S.A.

Your opinion may vary -- but you need NOT place a value judgement on my opinion that I am WEAK and need a REFUGE. Why don't you run along to DU where you can read posts which won't inspire your insipid commentary and hostile snide remarks?

35 posted on 11/25/2001 10:25:20 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
"This is like someone writing in 1880 predicting that future growth would cause a massive horse shortage."

Perhaps he should have said "whale oil" shortage

Actually in the late 1880s and early 1900s the worry was too many horses in the major cities (or more to the point the waste product horses create

;-}

36 posted on 11/25/2001 10:26:09 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Looks like you need to take a little of your own advice

How so? (and I will overlook the slam on lawyers)

37 posted on 11/25/2001 10:26:12 AM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
This article assumes that China will exist in 30 years.

I'd say that's a very good assumption.

38 posted on 11/25/2001 10:26:27 AM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: meridia
I am truly amazed at the military might we have. I heard that one American destroyer contains more firepower than all the weaponry we used in Vietnam combined. Not sure exactly how they calcultate that, but it is an interesting comparison.
40 posted on 11/25/2001 10:27:18 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Yes, I'll have to look in the archives here, but there was an article posted on this subject within the last two or three days. All the normal doomsayers were knocking the research.

Basically, if all oil is based on fossils, why then is methane the primary atmosphere of planets such as Neptune? How many dinos died there to cause that?

41 posted on 11/25/2001 10:28:21 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
The article suggests that in Afghanistan we are somehow losing in a zero-sum game of Great Power Ambition. In fact, we are the sole great power and Russia is competing with other oil-producing nations to serve us. The opportunity that Afghanistan provides to cast these roles with crystal clarity, is well worth allowing the Russians to participate in a win-win economic endeavor.

I don't know about the poster, but the article's author either has ulterior motives or is just another nattering nabob of negativism. Whether you emphasize his fear of Putin's machinations or lack of faith in the US administration, his shallow analysis is unadmirable at best.
42 posted on 11/25/2001 10:31:24 AM PST by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Yes, good question. I don't listen to the doomsayers much, either. All that oil sat on earth for 100's of 1000's of years, millions of years, and nobody knew about it, or what to do with it until very recently. Just think about all the other resources available to us to tap into, once we figure out what to do with it and how to use it. Nobody should underestimate human endeavor.
43 posted on 11/25/2001 10:31:33 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lucas1
What's this guy been smoking? Of course the U.S. and the oil companies know the Northern Alliance is Communist and supported by Moscow. The Russians also know there is no substantial market for Caspian oil/gas in either Russia or Western Europe.

So if anyone wants to sell that damned Caspian oil, it *has to* go through Afghanistan on its way to Asia. The Russians know this. The oil companies know this. The only thing standing in the way was a Fundamentalist regime in Kabul that was armed and financed by the drug business.

It wouldn't be the first time oil companies made deals with the Communists.

44 posted on 11/25/2001 10:32:50 AM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
Then why don't they cost $10?
45 posted on 11/25/2001 10:40:23 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Is that what you call....."Check Mate"

LOL...The dear Mr. Prsident line at the end of the article is an eye opener! hehehe......Truth is refreshing is it not!

46 posted on 11/25/2001 10:41:07 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Here's the link to that thread - here. Fuel for thought, so to speak.
47 posted on 11/25/2001 10:46:02 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lucas1
SO who is the oil man now, eh? Bush or the reds? And that's from a red!
48 posted on 11/25/2001 10:46:23 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Hi, yes, the military might and the technological prowess of the U.S. military is mind-boggling. It is curious to me that so many governments seemed to be oblivious of that FACT. Indeed, I believe that General Musharrif DID understand this, and that knowledge led to his automatic immediate decision to assist the U.S. Frankly, he had no other option, and he knew it. That's how I see it. And it should not take a full fledged GENERAL to see the obvious, that America is the strongest military power, and that if we decide to eliminate TERRORISTS from the face of the planet, that we couldn't care less if some countries call those primitive savages 'freedom fighters.' In any event, the issue is moot: it's only a matter of time before all terrorists are neutralized.
49 posted on 11/25/2001 10:48:57 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Listen, *sweetie* -- YOU with YOUR snide snootie remarks started it -- since YOU can't take what you dish out, Y=O=U are on my ignore-list, so don't bother responding with any more of your insipid contemptuous commentary.
50 posted on 11/25/2001 10:51:20 AM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson