Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biologist denies tainting survey
The Seattle Times ^ | December 19, 2001 | Lynda V. Mapes

Posted on 12/19/2001 9:30:09 AM PST by MadameAxe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 12/19/2001 9:30:10 AM PST by MadameAxe (Madameaxe_@hotmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Update, fyi...
2 posted on 12/19/2001 9:30:41 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
It is already an established fact that Federal employees are entitled to decieve the Citizens, even while in court and under oath they are entitled to lie. If Clintoon can get a way with it how can we hold any government employee to a higher standard.
3 posted on 12/19/2001 9:36:31 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
Buggy-whip salesmen felt the same way at the turn of the 19th century; vested-interest, and all that stuff.
4 posted on 12/19/2001 9:39:35 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
It's not like this is the only case of fraudulant attempts to promote an environmental agenda. What upsets me is that OUR tax money is used to cheat and lie to us. These people should be fired and prohibited from any type of government funded activity.
5 posted on 12/19/2001 9:39:37 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Er, they felt the same way as who? Sorry, I don't understand your comment.
6 posted on 12/19/2001 9:43:25 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
Once again...Our tax dollars at work...sad, very sad.

Not surprised after eight years of the sexual deviant in charge...exPOTUS42

7 posted on 12/19/2001 9:54:29 AM PST by B-A-Grizzley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
Once again...Our tax dollars at work...sad, very sad.

Not surprised after eight years of the sexual deviant in charge...exPOTUS42

8 posted on 12/19/2001 9:55:25 AM PST by B-A-Grizzley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
keepin' my eye on this.....
9 posted on 12/19/2001 10:11:29 AM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
But a U.S. Forest Service employee involved in the decision to send in hair from a captive lynx said yesterday that the sample had been clearly labeled so it wouldn't be confused with samples from the survey.

Nice try at changing the subject loser...
And where did the sample come from in the first place?
Who decided to include superfluous samples?

We need more names.

10 posted on 12/19/2001 10:12:31 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe;spycatcher;ben ficklin;dandelion
... "It was perhaps bad judgment, but that was it. Our intent was honorable, and it seemed like a good idea at the time.... "
"It's just really unfortunate... "

How clintonian.

"If we were to do it again we wouldn't, or we would do it as an official thing."

He didn't enjoy it and he didn't inhale -- sound familiar?

11 posted on 12/19/2001 10:15:11 AM PST by MaeWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
Sorry, I am sometimes too cryptic; the researchers involved owe their livelihood to the the continuance of their study and that depends on positive results to continue funding and to accomplish an inferred agenda, so why would they not "season the pot?"
12 posted on 12/19/2001 10:22:25 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
"the the...", apparently I also stutter, sorry.
13 posted on 12/19/2001 10:24:08 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe;editor-surveyor;Robert A. Cook,PE;michigander, lowbridge;MeeknMing;Squantos;thucydides...
Ping
14 posted on 12/19/2001 10:25:02 AM PST by MaeWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Thanks for the clarification. I would think that they could find some other animal to study, but I see what you mean.

I can't decide whether to attribute this incident to evil or mere incompetence. It's quite a coincidence that this happened in more than one district though.

15 posted on 12/19/2001 10:28:53 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
Two points:

1) We can see the influence of 8 years of Clintonism here on our govt employees. Basically, their response to being caught is to lie and self-righteously maintain that even if they DID lie, it was for a noble (read: liberal) cause.

2) My copy of the Constitution must have some pages missing...I can't find anywhere where it states that the federal govt should be conducting "lynx surveys".

16 posted on 12/19/2001 10:45:02 AM PST by quebecois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
From the article: "...that the sample had been clearly labeled so it wouldn't be confused with samples from the survey. "

If this is the case, then the person who initiated a needless investigation should be fired. How dare this person waste tax dollars challenging a survey whose results have been handled with absolute scientific integrity. Perhaps the accused employees will sue the government and we can pay some more.

17 posted on 12/19/2001 10:45:34 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quebecois
My copy of the Constitution must have some pages missing...I can't find anywhere where it states that the federal govt should be conducting "lynx surveys".

Your copy must not include all those invisible penumbras they've been adding for the last hundred or more years. It's to promote the "general welfare", dontcha know...

18 posted on 12/19/2001 11:03:24 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
But a U.S. Forest Service employee involved in the decision to send in hair from a captive lynx said yesterday that the sample had been clearly labeled so it wouldn't be confused with samples from the survey.
First off that's laughable that they labeled it correctly. Second off wouldn't a normal clear thinking honest person tell the lab to check and make sure they didn't test it incorrectly after receiving the results? The dept left their zeal (or need of a job) to interfere with their decision making.
19 posted on 12/19/2001 11:10:56 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
These idiots ought to be fired! We have had problems with the Fish and Wildlife Service here in NM. They have tried hiding the problems with the Mexican Gray Wolf. They have become a real problem in the NW part of the state. Bottom line, NEVER BELIEVE THESE PEOPLE!
20 posted on 12/19/2001 11:16:18 AM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson