Skip to comments.
Biologist denies tainting survey
The Seattle Times ^
| December 19, 2001
| Lynda V. Mapes
Posted on 12/19/2001 9:30:09 AM PST by MadameAxe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
12/19/2001 9:30:10 AM PST
by
MadameAxe
(Madameaxe_@hotmail.com)
To: anniegetyourgun
Update, fyi...
2
posted on
12/19/2001 9:30:41 AM PST
by
MadameAxe
To: MadameAxe
It is already an established fact that Federal employees are entitled to decieve the Citizens, even while in court and under oath they are entitled to lie. If Clintoon can get a way with it how can we hold any government employee to a higher standard.
To: MadameAxe
Buggy-whip salesmen felt the same way at the turn of the 19th century; vested-interest, and all that stuff.
To: MadameAxe
It's not like this is the only case of fraudulant attempts to promote an environmental agenda. What upsets me is that OUR tax money is used to cheat and lie to us. These people should be fired and prohibited from any type of government funded activity.
5
posted on
12/19/2001 9:39:37 AM PST
by
caisson71
To: Old Professer
Er, they felt the same way as who? Sorry, I don't understand your comment.
6
posted on
12/19/2001 9:43:25 AM PST
by
MadameAxe
To: MadameAxe
Once again...Our tax dollars at work...sad, very sad.
Not surprised after eight years of the sexual deviant in charge...exPOTUS42
To: MadameAxe
Once again...Our tax dollars at work...sad, very sad.
Not surprised after eight years of the sexual deviant in charge...exPOTUS42
To: MadameAxe
keepin' my eye on this.....
9
posted on
12/19/2001 10:11:29 AM PST
by
rface
To: MadameAxe
But a U.S. Forest Service employee involved in the decision to send in hair from a captive lynx said yesterday that the sample had been clearly labeled so it wouldn't be confused with samples from the survey. Nice try at changing the subject loser...
And where did the sample come from in the first place?
Who decided to include superfluous samples?
We need more names.
To: MadameAxe;spycatcher;ben ficklin;dandelion
... "It was perhaps bad judgment, but that was it. Our intent was honorable, and it seemed like a good idea at the time.... "
"It's just really unfortunate... "How clintonian.
"If we were to do it again we wouldn't, or we would do it as an official thing."
He didn't enjoy it and he didn't inhale -- sound familiar?
11
posted on
12/19/2001 10:15:11 AM PST
by
MaeWest
To: MadameAxe
Sorry, I am sometimes too cryptic; the researchers involved owe their livelihood to the the continuance of their study and that depends on positive results to continue funding and to accomplish an inferred agenda, so why would they not "season the pot?"
To: Old Professer
"the the...", apparently I also stutter, sorry.
To: MadameAxe;editor-surveyor;Robert A. Cook,PE;michigander, lowbridge;MeeknMing;Squantos;thucydides...
Ping
14
posted on
12/19/2001 10:25:02 AM PST
by
MaeWest
To: Old Professer
Thanks for the clarification. I would think that they could find some other animal to study, but I see what you mean.
I can't decide whether to attribute this incident to evil or mere incompetence. It's quite a coincidence that this happened in more than one district though.
To: MadameAxe
Two points:
1) We can see the influence of 8 years of Clintonism here on our govt employees. Basically, their response to being caught is to lie and self-righteously maintain that even if they DID lie, it was for a noble (read: liberal) cause.
2) My copy of the Constitution must have some pages missing...I can't find anywhere where it states that the federal govt should be conducting "lynx surveys".
To: MadameAxe
From the article: "...that the sample had been clearly labeled so it wouldn't be confused with samples from the survey. "
If this is the case, then the person who initiated a needless investigation should be fired. How dare this person waste tax dollars challenging a survey whose results have been handled with absolute scientific integrity. Perhaps the accused employees will sue the government and we can pay some more.
To: quebecois
My copy of the Constitution must have some pages missing...I can't find anywhere where it states that the federal govt should be conducting "lynx surveys".Your copy must not include all those invisible penumbras they've been adding for the last hundred or more years. It's to promote the "general welfare", dontcha know...
To: MadameAxe
But a U.S. Forest Service employee involved in the decision to send in hair from a captive lynx said yesterday that the sample had been clearly labeled so it wouldn't be confused with samples from the survey.
First off that's laughable that they labeled it correctly. Second off wouldn't a normal clear thinking honest person tell the lab to check and make sure they didn't test it incorrectly after receiving the results? The dept left their zeal (or need of a job) to interfere with their decision making.
19
posted on
12/19/2001 11:10:56 AM PST
by
lelio
To: MadameAxe
These idiots ought to be fired! We have had problems with the Fish and Wildlife Service here in NM. They have tried hiding the problems with the Mexican Gray Wolf. They have become a real problem in the NW part of the state. Bottom line, NEVER BELIEVE THESE PEOPLE!
20
posted on
12/19/2001 11:16:18 AM PST
by
wjcsux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson