Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico Lower on Bush's List Since Sept. 11
New York Times ^ | Saturday, December 29, 2001 | TIM WEINER and GINGER THOMPSON

Posted on 12/29/2001 1:04:06 AM PST by JohnHuang2

December 29, 2001

Mexico Lower on Bush's List Since Sept. 11

By TIM WEINER and GINGER THOMPSON

MEXICO CITY, Dec. 28 — Not long ago, President Bush called Mexico America's most important friend among the world's nations.

He met with President Vicente Fox more often than with any other leader. He spoke of a "special relationship" with Mexico, a phrase traditionally reserved for Britain.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell cited "the special place Mexico holds in our national priorities." The two countries were forging agreements that would have forever altered their political and economic relations, and changed the lives of millions of migrants.

But for the moment, Mexico has fallen off Washington's foreign policy agenda.

Though President Bush has reiterated his commitment to Mexico, and President Fox has expressed support for the American campaign against terrorism, serious talks on every important issue uniting and dividing the two countries — trade, drug trafficking, immigration — have been all but suspended since Sept. 11.

And like a bride left standing at the altar, Mexico is starting to wonder how long it will have to wait.

"For us, Sept. 11 did not change the pace of our work," President Fox said in an interview. "We have kept our focus. The United States has changed. They have had to pause. For them the focus on terrorism has forced them to put less attention on our bilateral issues.

"I understand that necessity. But at the same time, I would like to see that once their work is done we can advance on our pending issues."

Mr. Fox said he hoped that the United States and Mexico could reach agreement on sweeping immigration reforms by next summer. Among other things, the Mexican government is pressing the United States to expand current guest worker programs and give legal status to some three million Mexicans staying illegally in the United States.

But "the events of Sept. 11 put things on hold," said Mexico's foreign minister, Jorge Castañeda.

Hopes for a more open border, freer immigration and new United States investment in Mexico have been buried under the weight of the attacks, the heightened interest in border security to weed out terrorists and the economic slump in the United States.

Mr. Fox's "dream of an open border between the United States and Mexico is counted among many of the losses caused by the attacks of Sept. 11," said Peter Andreas, a political scientist at Brown University.

Without concrete progress toward a common agenda between the two countries, and without a strong American economy to bolster Mexico's, much of what Mr. Fox hoped to achieve in his six years as president may become a distant vision.

"There is no country in the world that's suffered more from the eclipse of Sept. 11 and the laser focus of the Bush administration on bin Laden than Mexico," said Robert A. Pastor, a former National Security Council staff member and a longtime expert on Mexico, who is now at Emory University.

Before the attacks on New York and Virginia, the two neighbors were working on new safety plans for the 2,000-mile border, where hundreds of immigrants die each year from exposure to heat and cold crossing illegally into the United States through trackless deserts.

The two presidents even broached issues considered taboo by past governments, including United States investment in Mexico's energy industry and permission for American law enforcement officials to operate on Mexican soil. All remain on the to-do list.

Mr. Fox spoke of his desire to achieve new agreements with the United States during a trip to the border last week — the same border that Mr. Powell, in his first news conference as secretary of state, said was "no longer a line that divides us, but a region that unites our nations."

For now, the line once again is a wall. "The voices that once clamored for open borders have quieted," Mr. Andreas writes in a forthcoming edition of Foreign Affairs in Spanish. In Washington, he says, "anguished and somber conversations about perimeters of security and defense of national territory" have replaced animated conversations about a united frontier, and "defenders of an open border are ridiculed."

One million people still cross that line every day, Mr. Fox said. Foreign-owned factories generate millions of dollars in tax revenues and tens of thousands of jobs each year, and help drive what last year was a quarter-trillion-dollar economic engine of cross-border trade.

But some 300,000 Mexicans illegally enter the United States across that same border each year. Other foreigners can also cross it. And that is now, in many American eyes, a national security issue above all.

Senior Mexican government officials say the terrorist strikes should make it easier to win political support for the legalization of undocumented Mexican immigrants, a centerpiece of Mr. Fox's proposals.

The officials argue that giving the immigrants United States identification cards, Social Security numbers and driver's licenses would pull them out of society's shadows and into the light of governmental oversight.

That argument has not won any visible support at the White House. So President Fox struggles to keep his dream alive, to stay on the United States foreign policy radar by capitalizing on Washington's new national security priorities, with the aim of renewing American interest in Mexico's hopes.

He has pledged unconditional support for the campaign against terrorism, offering to freeze bank accounts of people or organizations suspected of supporting terrorists and placing new visa restrictions on travelers entering Mexico.

"Mexico will be neither a residence for terrorists nor a transit stop for terrorists to enter the United States," he said. "We will fulfill that commitment."

Not all of Washington has forgotten the first nine months of 2001, when Mr. Fox was a darling of politicians left and right, and the two nations' plans seemed so in sync.

The Democratic leaders in Congress, Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Representative Dick Gephardt of Missouri, visited Mexico last month to emphasize their support for President Fox's immigration proposals. Kenneth W. Dam, the United States deputy Treasury secretary, said during a visit to Mérida this month that Mexico remained a priority for Mr. Bush.

"Nothing is more important to President Bush than this partnership" with Mexico, Mr. Dam said. Though "the whole world changed" on Sept. 11, he said, "one thing did not change, and that is the importance to the U.S. of this partnership."

But the progress the two partners achieved in the last three months fell short of what once seemed possible. Mexico has "come back full force to the bilateral agenda," Mr. Fox said, even if the United States has not. And next year, he said, "we will have the advances we want."



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Quote of the Day by CW_Conservative
1 posted on 12/29/2001 1:04:06 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
Setember 11th did put a bit of a krimp in the globalist agenda; it engendered all those things in America which the globalists are trying to marginalize - patriotism, a strong military, a strong intelligence community, a return to core American values, etc. The comments made by the Mexican government officials regarding the legalization of Mexican illegals highlights the difference between the two cultures - the Mexicans WANT their people to be placed in "the light of governmental oversight"; most Americans do NOT WANT governmental oversight in their daily lives. Socialism vs sovereignty, Marxism vs personal independence. Guess which system the globalists prefer?
3 posted on 12/29/2001 3:05:30 AM PST by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw;Mercuria;sarcasm;crabcake;dennisw
Socialism vs sovereignty, Marxism vs personal independence. Guess which system the globalists prefer?

Ughhh---Socialism and Marxism? (/sarcasm)

I am fed up with Fox and Castañeda. They can't run Mexico - what right do they have sticking their noses in our business?

Send Daschle and Gephardt back to Mexico - permanently!!

4 posted on 12/29/2001 3:25:07 AM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Crabcake
bttt
6 posted on 12/29/2001 8:48:57 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crabcake
Good post. A lot of good points there.
7 posted on 12/29/2001 8:52:17 AM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crabcake
Isn't it amazing that our immigraion laws - the decision about who will live among us - now considered the domain of a foreign, and arguably hostile government? See any Mex govt types siding with us against OBL? Nah. They thought we deserved it.

I always thought we were independent. Made our own laws.

The letter to the ed in S.D. is great. I have always thought that the Dashole was pulling one over on the people in S.D., who are mostly the older conservative Dems and farmers who want the subsidies.

If they understood what he has been doing to the rest of the country, if you could show them the anarchy on our streets in California, they could be persuaded to ditch him and the three other Demo quislings from the Dakotas, and that would be a bulletproof senate...not that Repubs wouldn't go the cheap labor route, but after watching Judd Gregg take on Daschle last year, I'm convinced that enough of them would put the country's interest first. Could be mistaken though...

I have one suggestion: if the people of S.D. continue to vote for "amnesty for all foreign lawbreakers and terrorists" Tommy Daschle, then let them take the illegals. We've got what, 3 million in CA alone? Give them a free ticket to Pierre, let them populate the street corners and parking lots there. Since South Dakota only has 754000 people, of whom 10,000 are "non-hospanic white", let them enjoy the benefits of multi-culturalism. Of course, the people who live there now will instantly be the minority, but hey, Tom will still be the Senator!

8 posted on 12/29/2001 10:18:31 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
OOPs, make that 10,000 who are Hispanic and 754000 "non-hispanic white". gotta proof these responses better before I hit the "post reply".
9 posted on 12/29/2001 10:33:12 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Of course, the people who live there now will instantly be the minority, but hey, Tom will still be the Senator!

That sadly is all they care about isn't it? The fact their lamebrain policies affect us negatively doesn't figure into their calculations.

Maybe the good farmers of SD will retire Tommy to pasture next time.

10 posted on 12/29/2001 10:59:17 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Yes, yes by all means. This is real progress. We're building a new Islamic republic in Afghanistan--complete with kinder, gentler sharia law-- while putting Mexico--who shares our vanishing southern border--on the back burner.
11 posted on 12/29/2001 11:09:52 AM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
I think this letter is the first inkling I've seen that they ARE getting it. Daschle goes home ever 6 yrs and pretends to be an FDR Dem, puts on a VFW cap (he was an AF intel officer at the end of Vietnam, but I don't think he ever went overseas) and hangs out with the old folks.

It's the phoniest act you'll ever see. It's the same with all the Dakota Dem Senators. We'll see how long the act holds up in the next few years.

B.t.w., don't look for the 'pubbies to get any of this. They're running around Washington bumping into walls, being befuddled (Gosh, whatever DID happen to Jim Gilmore?).

12 posted on 12/29/2001 11:10:42 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
Yes indeed. September 11th was really one in the eye for the globalists. We're building a new country in afghanistan, defending allah and oillah in Saudi Arabia, the Former Yugoslavia (hey---how 'bout that "former"?) Pakistan, Indonesia; Overseeing the progress of the Chosen People and negotiating on behalf of the not-quite-so-chosen.

Goodness, gracious--do you think all this raw isolationism is good for us?

13 posted on 12/29/2001 11:15:26 AM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
My family, who are staunch RATS, constantly bring up the fact that GW wants to open our borders. I'll just send them this article and enlighten them to what their people are doing. (Daschle and Gephardt)
14 posted on 12/29/2001 11:24:41 AM PST by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I am very glad that we are starting to see some bright spots in the fight against illegal immigration here in the United States. The recent roundup of the illegals that were working at the Salt Lake City airport was truly inspiring and made me feel proud of my country, something that I haven't felt in some time. I sent a fax to Paul Warner, the U.S. Attorney in charge of the round-up, and told him how proud I was of him for enforcing our immigration laws. Hopefully Mr. Warner can be an inspiration to other government officials and law enforcement agencies around the country to carry out their sworn duties and enforce our laws, all of our laws. If the lawless Mexicans don't like it, well that is just too bad!

We need to keep up the pressure on our elected officials by telephoning, faxing, or e-mailing them and letting them know how we feel on the subject of illegal immigration. Also be sure to keep expressing your opinions on messageboards, newsgroups, online opinion polls, and also on radio talk shows and letters to the editor, etc. The United States is a great country. Let's keep it great by seeing that it's laws are enforced and by having patriotic Americans getting more politically involved. That is how we can and will continue to turn the tide against illegal immigration in the USA.

15 posted on 12/29/2001 12:39:37 PM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson