Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Geopolitical Strategies of Russia, The 'Commonwealth of Independent States' and China
Perestroika Deception:Memorandum to CIA | March 26, 1992 | Anatoliy Golitsyn

Posted on 12/31/2001 4:17:02 PM PST by Orion78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: gcruse
Folks intent on hating the USSR back into existence should be careful what they wish for.

Like we are in a postition to prosecute the USSR and not the other way around. Get a grip.

41 posted on 06/15/2002 4:47:07 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Like we are in a postition to prosecute the
USSR and not the other way around. Get a grip.

Prosecute?  Here's a grip for youse.

There is a sort of American who cannot
let loose his hatred for the USSR even as
that government no longer exists.  It is akin
to hating the Bush administration because
Clinton used the White House as a platform
for treason, thereby ruining it forever.
The danger here is that by refusing to see
Russia as anything but a communist menace,
the reaction of Russians could be to say,
"why bother?" and in fact revert.  That makes
the Russophobe happy but does no one
else anything of benefit.

42 posted on 06/15/2002 9:48:10 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Thank you Registered!
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

43 posted on 06/15/2002 9:50:21 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Am I powerless able to prosecute the former USSR? OR is it the other way around, the former USSR with nukes still confining America prosecuting me?

Get a grip. Here we do not confine the former USSR, the reverse is a fact. Do you have your head up your a$$?

44 posted on 06/16/2002 2:22:04 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
As far as I know only the Berlin Wall confinement fell, the nukes are still armed and ready to go within minutes. So great, they freed their own people? I don't think so.
45 posted on 06/16/2002 2:24:16 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Russophobe happy but does no one else anything of benefit.

Russophobe? Sorry, but you are making racist generalities here. I am just as critical of government purported sinlessness in AMerica as I am in Russia. IS it Russophobic to deplore the fact that millions right now go in the pockets of those bureaucrats who were responsible for Chernobyl (so as to prevent them to start it again, supposedly), instead of going to those who really lost livelyhood in the area? Is that Russophobic to impose a balance of powers and benefits between regular Russians and corrupt bureaucrats?

Of course, for those who side with terrorism and the corrupt terrorist communists who are still confining the rest of the world with their nukes, it must be Russophobic.

46 posted on 06/16/2002 2:28:21 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
There is a sort of American who cannot let loose his hatred for the USSR even as that government no longer exists.

Stop prosecuting me with your ill placed hatred. YOu have a problem with me hating the people who are victimizing the world? Well up yours!

47 posted on 06/16/2002 2:36:34 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise; gcruse; Stavka2; EditorTFP; bat-boy; Orion78
It's a Belmont "Bunker" Mark, splinter-in-your-foot, I-really-love-my-state-of-the-art-tin-foil-hat bump!:)

In all grave seriousness, given the vast similarities between the mistakes made by the Triple Entente 1919 until WW-II and the ones the West have made since the "fall" of 1989 - 1991, we must consider certain scenarios. Failure to do so would be a horrible disservice to the world.

48 posted on 08/28/2002 11:16:40 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
That's an awful lot of, to be kind, 'stuff.' Anything in particular you wish to discuss?
49 posted on 08/29/2002 10:37:12 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Folks intent on hating the USSR back into existence should be careful what they wish for.

Folks intent on proselytising their insults without shame nor appologies better think about joining Johnie Taliban's camp.

50 posted on 09/03/2002 9:01:13 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Let me see if I understand you.
Because I think the regime
change in Russia (which is what
we are to het up to provide for
Iraq) resulted in a more
or less democratic government
in place of the communist one
it replaced, I am some kind
of American Taliban?  What
are you smoking today???
51 posted on 09/03/2002 3:12:50 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Yo, man, you're the one attacking people personaly, telling them they wish to hate Russia back into the USSR. If anyone is someking, it's you.
52 posted on 09/04/2002 1:37:29 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Do you thnk Russia is a communist threat?
53 posted on 09/04/2002 12:14:23 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; lavaroise; Orion78
Were the Communists ever punished and have they been prevented from holding power? (Answer - no.)

Was there ever a formal treaty to cover the reputed settlement ending the Cold War? (Answer - no.)

Were the countries who threated the West from 1945 - ? disarmed to a point where they would no longer be a threat? (Answer - no.)

Have Western nations explicitly and deterministically verified what few agreements exist? (Answer - no.)

Have the "former Eastern Bloc" nations continued to arm and economically support other nations who initially turned against the West during the late 70s and early 80s? (Answer - yes.)

Do the Russians actively support and enable the gradual but definite build up of strategic military capabilities of the PRC? (Answer - yes.)

Have the Russians changed a single geopolitical friendship with a single enemy of the USA since 9/11? (Answer - no.)

Have the Russians agreed to oppose the USA in the event of our defending Taiwan against PRC aggression? (Answer - yes.)

Did the Russians sign an historic Axis treaty with the PRC on 7/16/2001, less than 60 days prior to 9/11? (Answer - yes.)

Did the Russians back off from the 7/16/2001 treaty after 9/11? (Answer - no.)

Have our leaders been utter cowards in terms of asking direct questions or demanding real proof of appropriate behavior on the part of the "former Eastern Bloc" ever since 1991? (Answer - yes.)

Are there significant similarities between the ambiguous settlement of 1989 - 1991 and the one that came from the 1918 Armistice between the Triple Entente and the Axis Powers? (Answer - yes.)

Is the settlement of 1989 - 1991 even more permissive and more ambiguous in expectations and enforcement than either the Treaty of Versailles or the Treaty of Locarno? (Answer - yes.)

Have the Russians and other "former foes" of the US from the Cold War engaged in behavior such as hiding weapons, falsifying force levels, and using other nations as venues of both arms development and production?(Answer - yes.)

Did Weimar Germany also do this? (Answer - yes.)

Were the underpinnings of the Third Reich already in place as early as 1923, with wilful participation and full approval of the "republican" Weimar government? (Answer - yes.)

Have we failed to learn from history? (Answer - yes.)

54 posted on 09/05/2002 7:37:37 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark; gcruse; Orion78; Axion; swarthyguy; Askel5; Carbonsteel; Jeff Head; bat-boy; ...
Is Russia a communist threat?

Well, there are other choices. Russia could be a Soviet communist threat on steroids today, fed by a present generation of leaders who were schooled in the Soviet methods of interference and sabotage of independence in the 1960s. These are a new crop of monsters, I fear, who have known no other thing than communist/KGB Soviet techniques of "concordance" to create discord.

Unfortunately I fear these tactics are being implemented before our eyes today. I think Russia might very well be a communist threat to the power 10, and woe to those who ignore the dissidents, the nuke rocket confinements and who do not encourage Russians themselves to have their own government tone down its proselytist and charismatic tone.

Russia needs more of an Orthodox church like humility, a movement to heal the wounds of its true martyrs and dissidents, to reach out for this peace in independent concordance that produces projects in the free, unseen and unfettered privacy of their own people.

I fear that Bush and other liberals are the ones hating Russia back into the USSR, because they snub the martyrs of Russia, they snub the Orthodox church, they snub opportunities to make peace with the Russian people by the necessary bypassing of Russia's leaders to outreach the masses through the church or directly, they snub all that and instead build coalitions with gossipers, neighbor snitches and crooked KGB men in power, seeking the welfare of their peace, instead of providing peace welfare for the Russian people in the war on terror and Jihadic proselytism.

It's as if we hate a free Russia, ironicaly. The lure of free trade and free market unfortunately does not necessarily mean the independent uninterfered concordant privacy necessary for a free future. What is advocated unfortunately is a liberal psychedelic charismatic and discordant trade through imposed "multiculturalism", made of immigrants coming here and there, and school "integrations". Our freedom is a tenuous one too. It's the economy stupid is an arrogance. People only need to be left alone and to avoid the mass hysterias of joblessness and government dependance.

55 posted on 09/06/2002 4:50:23 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I do not want to "hate the USSR back into existence". Nor do I think they are a boogeyman.

However, I do believe that KGB Major Golitsyn is the real deal. I believe the long-term deception scenario that he described to the CIA during his defection debriefing is happening.

There is a book called "WEDGE: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA" by Mark Riebling. An online draft version can be found on the author's website http://www.markriebling.com/wedge.html

This book details the problems and rivalries between the FBI and the CIA since its inception. The part concerning Angleton, Hoover, Golitsyn and Nonsenko is as fascinating as it is troubling. I came away believing Angleton and Golitsyn over Hoover and Nonsenko.

Then there are the two books written by Golitsyn. He details close to two hundred global scenarios to watch for. To this date, 94% of these scenarios have come true. This includes the fall of the Berlin Wall. Our own CIA didn't even know it was going to happen until the day it took place, yet Golitsyn detailed it years before.

Golitsyn's story has been confirmed by Czech General Jan Sejna. I cannot remember the name of his book, (maybe Belmont Mark or one of the other gents know it) but in it, he speaks of the same deception scenario that Golitsyn does.

Now all of the above can be coincidences and/or lies made to sell books. I don't believe in coincidences and I trust the judgement of Angleton over Hoover. Angleton spent his career with the best interests of the United States in mind, while Hoover spent his career playing power games and politics.

I reject the idea that Golitsyn is making all this up to sell books (which others have implied). For one, he came to the U.S. in the sixties. He warned us during his debriefing and has continued to write to the CIA every since. He did not write his first book until the 80's. So I think that blows that theory out of the water.

Now maybe I am overly paranoid. However, if anyone actually takes the time to read all of the news article's posted by Orian78, or reads Gertz, Nyquist, Bodansky, Golitsyn, Sejna, Douglas and others, then I think an argument can be made to, at the very least, consider that there is more going on than in the world than terrorism.

As an afterthought, if more people in government were paranoid, maybe 911 wouldn't have taken place. Instead of paranoia, there appears to be institutional arrogance within our intel communities, as well as with the American people themselves. An arrogance that seems to say, "Nothing can hurt us! We're a superpower!"

I blame this on the poor state of education within the US. No one studies history. If we did, we would know that it is filled with the ashes of countries whom thought they could never be defeated.

This is the very reason why I think the deception has been and will continue to work until they are ready to implement.

Maybe I am wearing a tin-foil hat. I don't think so though.

56 posted on 09/06/2002 9:47:52 AM PDT by bat-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bat-boy
I'll have to look up that Senja reference. RE: tin foil hat... I used to get torqued when the conventional shallow thinkers would cast that barb my way, but now I wear it as a badge of honor. Hey, after seeing the still from "Signs" that someone posted on another Perestroika Deception related thread you and I were on earlier, me and the wife went out and took in that flick. Guess what? The guys / gal with the tin foil hats were proven correct! There you have it! ;)
57 posted on 09/06/2002 7:20:18 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
Stavka (meaning Generalissimo Stalin's HQ) says: "When ever you decide to come out of your bunker, take off the tin helmit".

He and his likes do not need no arguments. Arguments is the way to make their deception obvious - that's why they use noises and labels: "tinfoil helmet", "hating Soviet Union back into existence" and so on. Great sound, no substance.

In the meanwhile things foretold by Golytsin more than 10 years ago just continue to happen. He obviously is a specialist in Russian affairs, so the enemy within - American citizens who despise their own country and its values - are not included in his memorandums.

Which does not mean that we, as lay persons, should limit our own awareness.

And we should be aware that it does not matter how the Russian rulers call themselves: czars, General Secretaries, Presidents, Prime Ministers or whatever. World domination is their goal, and the United States the most obvious adversary. They had never shown any worry about the price for reaching it paid in their own subjects' lives... do you imagine they'll pity Americans or any other "foreigners" more?

58 posted on 10/14/2007 2:56:39 AM PDT by Neophyte (Nazis, Communists, Islamists... what the heck is the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Orion78

I really need to do an update on this thread...


59 posted on 10/16/2013 10:40:20 PM PDT by Orion78 (Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson