Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Narcissism Squared: Bill's Never Ending Obsession with Himself
Common Conservative ^ | 01/01/02 | Heidi Parent

Posted on 01/01/2002 10:35:26 AM PST by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: soundsolutions
He can be dangerous, but he doesn't have enough power to appeal to interns. Who would go with a man who lost his power and is known to trash the women he's uses? He's such a jerk, even young women know it. Who knows, maybe even the children of the nation are on to him. I'm not saying he's obvious, but if you can't see what he is, your IQ is below 75.

As much as I would love to believe that he has lost his power, I believe that he has enough power to still be dangerous for this country.

61 posted on 01/01/2002 12:21:31 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dorben
The bommer nailed it. The megamidget gave us Clinton twice, and that's exactly what he set out to do.
62 posted on 01/01/2002 12:24:32 PM PST by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I hope that one of the Little Rock Freepers can round up a before and after picture of the historical site, built by freed slaves after the Civil War, that was bull dozed to make room for Clinton's Liebrary,(did I get the spelling correct?).

If I remember one of the Free Republic posts, the destruction of this landmark came surreptiously while preservationist were in court trying to stop the demoliton. Clinton was quoted as saying something to the effect .."that it didn't matter since it wasn't important."

The before and after pictures and the quote ARE his legacy and we need to remind Black America how their first black president reated them.

Especially now, that it is reported that Wubya is garnering more Black support.

63 posted on 01/01/2002 12:27:18 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The Democrats who continue to defend this narcissistic-sociopath, who failed as a President and as a man, never seem to get it -- that they contintue to hurt their cause and their personal credibility. They do themselves and the country a disservice by defending the indefensible in their support of this little man, and by trying to re-write history with more spin.

Message to Democrats: Let the Clintons go! Let them hang and swing in the wind, as they have done to everyone around them!

64 posted on 01/01/2002 12:27:27 PM PST by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
ping
65 posted on 01/01/2002 12:35:53 PM PST by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Thorondir
Oh , I do not dispute that for a second . I just understood that the connection was made due to the slick 1's character . Lack of , is more like it .
66 posted on 01/01/2002 12:41:23 PM PST by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Excellent post - thank you. JL
67 posted on 01/01/2002 12:42:00 PM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
Hello again! But I must disagree with you on this one. It clearly is outlined in the Bible that history will indeed repeat itself, when the anti-Christ comes on to the scene. Bill Clinton was just a warm-up!
68 posted on 01/01/2002 12:44:00 PM PST by soundsolutions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
clinton legacy......
Oxymoron!
clintoon is a big nothing
Hence...
his legacy is a big nothing

Ohh, Wait...
he does know how to whine...
69 posted on 01/01/2002 12:44:32 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
I feel the same about little rossie.
70 posted on 01/01/2002 12:45:38 PM PST by angry elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Oh, I think that it is you the underestimates the power of this man and the potential destruction he could still wreck upon this country. His wife is being touted as the next president; he is the number 1 fundraiser for the liberals. Do I have to spell it out any clearer?
71 posted on 01/01/2002 12:47:06 PM PST by soundsolutions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
Actually, either way would suit me fine!

We agree where it counts, the things under rocks that make people say "yuck" say "yuck" when they see clintoon!!

72 posted on 01/01/2002 12:53:08 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
Yes, we can all thank Ross Perot for that turd being President.

Here's his proudest moment, trying to get out of a question about rape from Sam Donaldson in the Rose Garden.

March 19, 1999 Press Conference.

Sam?

QUESTION: Mr. President, when Juanita Broaddrick leveled her charges against you of rape in a nationally televised interview, your attorney David Kendall issued a statement denying them. But shouldn't you speak directly on this matter and reassure the public?

And if they are not true, can you tell us what your relationship with Ms. Broaddrick was, if any?

CLINTON: Well, five weeks ago today, five weeks ago today, I stood in the rose garden after the Senate voted and I told you that I thought I owed it to the American people to give them 100 percent of my time and to focus on their business, and that I would leave to others to decide whether they would follow that lead.

CLINTON: And that is why I have decided as soon as that vote was over that I would allow all future questions to be answered by my attorneys, and I think I made the right decision. I hope you can understand it. I think the American people do understand it and support it. And I think it was the right decision.

QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE [WON'T YOU]) simply DENY IT, SIR?

CLINTON: There's been a statement made by my attorney. He speaks for me, and I think he spoke quite clearly.

Go ahead, Scott.

QUESTION: Mr. President, it seems you're on the verge of committing U.S. forces to combat without a clear definition of your threshold for doing so....

__________________________________________________

Attorney KENDALL'S STATEMENT:

"Any allegation that the President [Carter?] assaulted Ms. Broaddrick more than 20 years ago is absolutely false. Beyond that, we are not going to comment."

______________________________________________________ WH web site (has Press Conference archives):

http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1999/3/22/4.text.1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gore on Juanita Broaddrick: transcript.

The following conversation occurred between Mr. Al Gore and New Hampshire citizen, Katherine Prudhomme (a former Democrat and at the time a McCain supporter) at a town meeting in Derry, NH on Dec. 14, 1999. It is reproduced without the numerous um’s and ah’s inserted by the Vice President in the exchange.

*******************************************************

Q: When Juanita Broaddrick made the claim, which I found to be quite credible, that she was raped by Bill Clinton, did that change your opinion about him being one of the best presidents in history? And do you believe Juanita Broaddrick’s claim? And what did you tell your son about this?

Gore: (nervous chuckle) Well, I don’t know what to make of her claim, because I don’t know how to evaluate that story, I really don’t.

Q: Did you see the interview?

Gore: No, I didn’t see the interview. No. Uh-uh.

Q: I’m very surprised you didn’t watch the interview.

Gore: Well, which show was it on?

Q: ABC, I believe [actually it was NBC].

Gore: I didn’t see it. There have been so many personal allegations and such a non-stop series of attacks, I guess I’m like a lot of people in that I think that enough is enough. I do not know how to evaluate each on of these individual stories. I just don’t know. I would never violate the privacy of my communication with one of my children, a member of my family, as for that part of your question. But,…

Q: SO, YOU DON’T BELIEVE JUANITA BROADDRICK’S CLAIM?

Gore: NO; I DIDN’T SAY THAT. I said I don’t know how to evaluate that, and I didn’t see the interview. But I must say something else to you about this. Why don’t you just stand back up; I’d like to look you in the eye. I think that whatever MISTAKES [Bill Clinton] made in his personal life are in the minds of most Americans must be balanced against what he has done for his public life as president. My philosophy, since you asked about my religious faith, I’m taught in my religious tradition to hate the sin and love the sinner. I’m taught that ALL OF US ARE HEIR TO MISTAKES, that flesh is heir to. And I think that, in judging his performance as a president, I think that most people are anxious to stop talking about all the personal attacks against him. And trying to sort out all of the allegations, and want to, instead, MOVE ON, and focus on the future. Now, I’ll say this to you, he is my friend, and that friendship is important, and IF YOU’VE EVER HAD A FRIEND WHO HAS MADE A SERIOUS MISTAKE and then repaired the friendship and MOVED ON, then you know what that relationship has been like for me. Secondly, I felt the same disappointment and anger at him during the period when all this was going on that most people did. You may have felt a different kind of emotion, I don’t know. I sense that maybe you did. I certainly felt what most Americans did. Third, I have been involved in a lot of battles where he and I have fought together on behalf of the American people, and I think we’ve made a good, positive difference for this country. Number four, I’m running for president on my own. I want to take my own values of faith and family to the presidency, and I want you to evaluate me on the basis of who I am and what you believe I can do for this country as president. Thank you.

This conversation was reprinted in The Weekly Standard, Dec. 27, 1999, p. 2.

http://weeklystandard.com/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bottom line: Rape = mistake

73 posted on 01/01/2002 12:53:36 PM PST by 4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Exit148
I saw the samething on C-span this am. I could not believe it. During the question and answer part I was sick when they announced that no one other than James Carville was the one to ask the questions from the audience. A packed house at the Kennedy Center in October.
74 posted on 01/01/2002 12:57:03 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"...Never Ending Obsession..."

Aside from Bill's head, the only place where Clinton obsession thrives is FR...LIVE IN THE NOW!

Small minds are preoccupied with other people.

Average minds are preoccupied with happenings.

Great minds are preoccupied with ideas.

P.S. The intellectual cud contained in this article doubtless places it's author in the first category.

My point...it's a great big, beautiful world out there...what's done is done...LIVE IN THE NOW!

75 posted on 01/01/2002 1:14:32 PM PST by spanky_mcfarland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanky_mcfarland
This sounds exactly like the mantra from the left, they kept telling us to move on... Ever heard of history repeating itself?
76 posted on 01/01/2002 1:22:49 PM PST by soundsolutions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: spanky_mcfarland
Ah well , Welcome to the Familia . Nice to see you back , But I still do not have the patience like Alamo-girl does . I presume you have read this fine piece she put together ?
77 posted on 01/01/2002 1:23:15 PM PST by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: spanky_mcfarland
Spanky, are you a democrat? Can't help but wonder.

The Dems've been "living in the past" for years. They regularly attempt to rewrite history (Reagan) and revisit the past (Nixon).

These are just facts, not 'cud.'

Sober up.

78 posted on 01/01/2002 1:23:44 PM PST by 4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: soundsolutions
I know what you are trying to say I just don't agree. Klintoon is and should be held accountable for everything he has done in his life just as should you and I. And this crap about the Psychological side of the poor bastard is just hooey. I don't care if a murderer had a tough childhood and it should have no effect on his or her being hung. I have heard the drivel about him being torn between two domineering females and the tough time he had trying to please them. Nothing justifies an assult on the ladies he attacked. Nothing should prevent our legal system from putting this gangster in jail. There is nothing anyone can say to plead this piece of human garbbages case as to being responsible for his behavior. He had a tough childhood. Crapola.
79 posted on 01/01/2002 1:51:40 PM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: soundsolutions
I know what you are trying to say I just don't agree. Klintoon is and should be held accountable for everything he has done in his life just as should you and I. And this crap about the Psychological side of the poor bastard is just hooey. I don't care if a murderer had a tough childhood and it should have no effect on his or her being hung. I have heard the drivel about him being torn between two domineering females and the tough time he had trying to please them. Nothing justifies an assult on the ladies he attacked. Nothing should prevent our legal system from putting this gangster in jail. There is nothing anyone can say to plead this piece of human garbbages case as to being responsible for his behavior. He had a tough childhood. Crapola.
80 posted on 01/01/2002 1:52:03 PM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson