New Theory on Big Bang

AP ^ | 1-10-2001 | AP

[JediGirl]

bump

[Physicist]

Yesterday's thread (different article).

[JediGirl]

sorry about that :)

thanks

[Consort]

There was no Big Bang. Our universe came out of a giant Black Hole from a different universe or from a different part of our universe. It will happen again.

[Digger]

Me thinks that the more they know the more they don't know.

[Junior]

Gadzooks!

Ten days into the new year and we've already had 14 crevo threads:

2002

• (2002-01-01) Conservatives, Darwin & Design: An Exchange

• (2002-01-01) Design Yes, Intelligent No

• (2002-01-01) Intelligent Design As a Theory of Technological Evolution

• (2002-01-07) Genetic Marker Tells Squash Domestication Story

• (2002-01-07) SNPs as Windows on Evolution

• (2002-01-07) Supreme Court Won't Hear Case on Teaching Evolution

• (2002-01-07) Universe Of Life: Maybe Not, A

• (2002-01-07) What Every Theologian Should Know about Creation, Evolution, and Design

• (2002-01-08) Democratization of Science, The

• (2002-01-08) Progressive Creationism

• (2002-01-08) Universe Might Last Forever, Astronomers Say, but Life Might Not, The

• (2002-01-09) Life On Other Planets? Vatican Aide Ponders The Possibility

• (2002-01-09) What Would Newton Do?

• (2002-01-10) New Theory on Big Bang

(This is simply a type of bump)

[JediGirl]

Also, Primordial air may have been breathable.

[onedoug]

God knows....

[Stat-boy]

The Big Bang theory:

God spoke and, BANG!, the universe was created.

[First_Salute]

Ya take yer linneerr accelerator and 'bout 10 "experts." They fire it up to see if'n they can re-creeate a glimpse of the "big bang" ... begin'n of the unerverse.

And they do.

END OF STORY --- BEGINNING OF NEW ONE.

[keithtoo]

``Star formation took place early and very rapidly,''

It ALWAYS comes back to 'apparently sudden' formation (yeah, I know, the timelines vary widely, but the 'evidence' shows up quickly), whether we are talking about stars, or mammals. Wonder why?

[Come get it]

Why is it that the "Big Bang" theory changes a few times every year, yet the Bible still says the same thing. Neither one can be proven beyond a doubt, but I'd rather believe the one that doesn't have to change all the time to avoid discrepancy.

[nimdoc]

Enter a reply.

[Come get it]

Why is it that the "Big Bang" theory changes a few times every year, yet the Bible still says the same thing?

Neither one can be proven beyond a doubt, but I'd rather believe the one that doesn't have to change all the time to avoid discrepancy.

[Come get it]

Forgive the double post...

[JediGirl]

Why is it that the "Big Bang" theory changes a few times every year, yet the Bible still says the same thing. Neither one can be proven beyond a doubt, but I'd rather believe the one that doesn't have to change all the time to avoid discrepancy.

It's because theories are revised as more information surfaces. THe Bible on the other hand, is a religious text so of course, never changes.

[Physicist]

Why is it that the "Big Bang" theory changes a few times every year, yet the Bible still says the same thing?

Because scientists learn, while fundamentalists don't.

:-)

[Delbert]

Reminds me of a billboard I saw here in Dallas.

Big Bang?

You've got to be kidding.

God

[gjenkins]

The bible is perhaps the most studied, disputed, and disagreed about writing of all times. At best it decribes a perfect but unobtainable description of reality and life.