Skip to comments.
Woman Sues Over 'Girls Gone Wild'
AP (via NY Times) ^
| January 22, 2002
| By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Posted on 01/22/2002 11:20:09 AM PST by 68skylark
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- A woman who bared her breasts at Mardi Gras and got worldwide exposure has sued the producers of the ``Girls Gone Wild'' videos, claiming they invaded her privacy and used her image without permission.
Becky Lynn Gritzke, a Florida State University business major, admits in her lawsuit that she was among the women who removed their tops at Mardi Gras last year in exchange for beads and trinkets.
A month later, Gritzke said, she was surprised to find out that she not only appeared in the video series featuring women baring their bodies, but was also seen in the TV ad and Web site.
Gritzke is seeking unspecified damages.
Ronald E. Guttman, an attorney for MRA Holdings LLC, the video's producers, said there is no privacy protection for people who take their clothes off in public, especially at a big public event where many people have cameras.
Guttman has asked a Florida court to dismiss the lawsuit, which was filed in September.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-130 next last
I'm as sorry as anyone that no photos accompanied this article.
1
posted on
01/22/2002 11:20:09 AM PST
by
68skylark
To: 68skylark
Ronald E. Guttman, an attorney for MRA Holdings LLC, the video's producers, said there is no privacy protection for people who take their clothes off in public, especially at a big public event where many people have cameras.This makes entirely too much sense...
2
posted on
01/22/2002 11:22:36 AM PST
by
Poohbah
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: 68skylark
I'm guessing that this lawsuit disappears faster than a Clinton promise. She has no case at all.
4
posted on
01/22/2002 11:23:34 AM PST
by
Maceman
To: 68skylark
Worldwide exposure, eh?
To: 68skylark
claiming they invaded her privacy and used her image without permission. She's only p'od 'cause they're making money from it and she's not.
To: Maceman
Yeh, but I bet it'll increase sales of these tapes...
7
posted on
01/22/2002 11:24:41 AM PST
by
Exeter
To: 68skylark
a Florida State University business majorWe used to make fun of the female business majors at FSU. They used to not show us their breasts.
8
posted on
01/22/2002 11:25:12 AM PST
by
Wm Bach
To: 68skylark
"there is no privacy protection for people who take their clothes off in public, especially at a big public event where many people have cameras." I agree. They do the same thing here in Mobile every year during Mardi Gras. Many people will not take their kids to Mardi Gras anymore because of the 'roudiness.'
9
posted on
01/22/2002 11:25:38 AM PST
by
blam
To: 68skylark
Do the crime....do the time.
"Mommy, have you ever been in the movies?"
To: 68skylark
I say they take it to Judge Judy or the people's court. No coverups!
11
posted on
01/22/2002 11:26:16 AM PST
by
ZOOKER
To: 68skylark
Becky Lynn Gritzke, a Florida State University business major, admits in her lawsuit that she was among the women who removed their tops at Mardi Gras last year in exchange for beads and trinkets. She is a business major and made a trade like that? Did she learn nothing in the history lessons where the Indians traded Long Island for beads and trinkets?
To: 68skylark
A woman who bared her breasts at Mardi Gras and got worldwide exposure has sued the producers of the ``Girls Gone Wild'' videos, claiming they invaded her privacy and used her image without permission.
LMAO only in America. She's probably a retrovirgin too.
To: 68skylark
This makes as much sense as a stripper complaining that she gets her butt pinched occasionally...
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: 68skylark
Anyone remember the SNL skit on this from last year? It's priceless.
16
posted on
01/22/2002 11:27:34 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
To: 68skylark
This will get major media attention,followed by a spread in playboy very soon.If she can't re-coup in the court she might as well sell her image to playboy.She'll be worth millions in a few years.
To: 68skylark
I'm as sorry as anyone that no photos accompanied this article. Actually it almost rises to the level of "abuse". ;)
To: 68skylark
As an aside, apparently here in Quebec we have a law that states that you can't use someone's image/likeness without their express permission, save for use in a news broadcast. I believe it's the only law in North America with such a law. FYI
To: ZOOKER
Or is that Jugs Judy?
20
posted on
01/22/2002 11:28:12 AM PST
by
js1138
To: 68skylark
I bet they put her up to the lawsuit to drum up publicity. After sales go through the roof, she gets a cut.
To: Maceman
I'm guessing that this lawsuit disappears faster than a Clinton promise. She has no case at all. Actually, this story has been posted here many months ago when it first came up(unless there are two women here in Tallahassee who are suing these guys). What she is stating(and what was discussed before) is that, although she voluntarily exposed herself, they have been using her pictures to profit(I heard there was a foreign billborad with her picture on it). She actually has a pretty good case. Almost all courts have historically ruled for compensation when a person's likeness has been used without permission. In this case, its not meerly her likeness, its her picture, which she was not payed for. The company will settle if they are smart.
To: Rightwing Canuck
Oops...that should read:
I believe it's the only place in North America with such a law
To: js1138
Or is that Jugs Judy? God no
To: 68skylark
One would think photos of someone appearing in public would be public domain, but the heirs of MLK are trying to change for the use of the same. Doesn't make any sense to me.
25
posted on
01/22/2002 11:29:13 AM PST
by
Voltage
To: Ward Smythe
She's only p'od 'cause they're making money from it and she's not. It sounds more like she was good-looking enough that the company decided to single her photo out to advertise their product and she's getting a little more exposure than she bargained for when she bared herself in public.
Still, she shoulda kept her shirt on. Now she's facing the embarrasing consequences of her actions --something people aren't accustomed to doing these days.
26
posted on
01/22/2002 11:29:29 AM PST
by
Drew68
To: 68skylark
invaded her privacy She wasn't in private. It is a public event. She asked for it, she got it. She's embarassed. A woman scorned...
To: ColdSteelTalon
This makes as much sense as a stripper complaining that she gets her butt pinched occasionally... An acquaintance took his girlfriend to Mardi Gras last year. He encouraged her to 'show off' and then learned that a lot of guys take her 'showing off' as license to cop a feel. I had a hard time not laughing at him as he told his story.
28
posted on
01/22/2002 11:30:05 AM PST
by
TC Rider
To: 68skylark
check her out here...
http://www.campuscalendars.com/fsu/september.htm
To: 68skylark
To: 68skylark


Text accompanying the photo
Becky is our Miss September 2000, she is very involved with campus activities at Florida State University, where she is studying Accounting and Finance. Becky is a South Florida native, hailing from Ft. Lauderdale. Miss September is an Alpha Kappa Psi.
31
posted on
01/22/2002 11:31:31 AM PST
by
Pete
To: SPG; 20something
Ummm comments... hehehe
To: ALL
This has been discussed before. The issue is that they are profiting from her likeness(her pictures actually) without permission/compensation. Most FR legal experts agreed she has a pretty good case on these grounds. She is an idiot, but she has a legal case. They owe her compensation.
To: oust the louse
This will get major media attention,followed by a spread in playboy very soon.If she can't re-coup in the court she might as well sell her image to playboy.She'll be worth millions in a few years. Yep; She just wants to shake the money tree.
34
posted on
01/22/2002 11:32:45 AM PST
by
Brett66
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Actually, it was Manhattan. And the Indians got the better end of the deal, when you recall that the original $24 invested at 6% would be worth $62 Billion today. And that the Dutch lost the colony to the English, while the Indians got to keep their trade goods.
35
posted on
01/22/2002 11:33:17 AM PST
by
Romulus
To: 68skylark
Daddy's little girl.
36
posted on
01/22/2002 11:34:03 AM PST
by
Azzurri
To: oust the louse
All she needs to do is copyright her breasts and then hire the MLK attorneys, she will hands down , so to speak..
To: blam
Too bad. When I lived in Mobile, over ten years ago, one of the attractions of Mardi Gras in the Azalea City was that it was still family fare, unlike what had taken over New Orleans.
38
posted on
01/22/2002 11:34:12 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: 68skylark
She was out in public, in a public space, at a public event and she is upset that the public can see her??
39
posted on
01/22/2002 11:34:33 AM PST
by
GeronL
To: Pete
I hope the remainder of the body is better than the face.
FSU is home to some of THE FINEST WOMEN in the country. Im not sure how it could get any better anywhere else.
To: one_particular_harbour
This is too funny. I actually saw the tapes a couple of weeks ago (don't even bother, they're silly and not that exciting) and was discussing this exact issue with my fellow paralegals and lawyers. Suing for damages is completely out, as the article suggests, especially considering that posing for the cameras at the request of the camera-holder (which happens in almost every instance) is a form of implied consent. However, I wonder whether someone could successfully sue for royalties. Either way, this reminds me of a Saturday Night Live sketch. Very funny. Anyone who has seen it knows what I'm talking about.
To: Maceman
she would have a better case asking for royalties... slightly better at any rate.
42
posted on
01/22/2002 11:36:03 AM PST
by
GeronL
To: 68skylark
My guess? Some magazine will offer to pay her to pose privately, doing what she did for free in a public place, and she will sign on the dotted line. Looks like a publicity ploy to me.
I'd think that anyone genuinely outraged would do everything she could not to call herself to the attention of the press - like NOT filing a lawsuit.
The reaction at my neighborhood bar? A titter went through the crowd. (ouch!)
To: 68skylark

Becky Lynn was the September 2000 girl for this calender. She "loves to meet people!" Hmmm...
To: 11th Earl of Mar
She wants the money from the lawsuit.
Order Online
|
Copyright © 1999, Campus Calendars. All Rights Reserved.
|
To: FreeTally
After thinking of this a bit ... I have to agree with you. Simply by being in public, does not mean you concent to having your picture circulated for public consumption, whether it's to promote a video, a hotdog or beer.
If you were photographed at a ball game, enjoying a beer and a hotdog ... and Budweiser chose to promote their product using your picture in their advertizement .... no one would question whether you were entiteled to compensation.
46
posted on
01/22/2002 11:38:11 AM PST
by
Hodar
To: oust the louse
She'll be worth millions in a few years She'll be worth a half million for a short time.... then she'll be worthless and people will make fun of her behind her back
47
posted on
01/22/2002 11:38:46 AM PST
by
GeronL
To: Pete
Dang, sorry about the duplicate...you beat me to the pic.
This chick doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hades of getting this frivolous suit into court.
To: 68skylark
But your honor, I wanted to show my boobs to the people at Burbon street that night; not to the people all over the world every night?
To: all
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson