Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VectoRama
Excuse me, I wanted to know how is this was true there would only be 36 posts after ALL this time. Then I reas the year 2000 mark on the article.

Why the article at this time?

37 posted on 01/31/2002 7:08:52 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy
reas = read. I found the article date of Jan 31. I at least feel better now about that.

The story is a story still though.

39 posted on 01/31/2002 7:10:07 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: A CA Guy; Rokke; SBeck
The original article by Reed Irvine is dated January 31, 2002 and is available at Accuracy In Media's website. Click here.
50 posted on 01/31/2002 10:05:11 PM PST by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: A CA Guy
Sorry, I must have deleted the second 2 in 2002 and accidently replaced it with 0 during copy/paste of the source code. That's all I can figure. The date of publication as I posted was Jan 31, 2002..... i.e., it's new!
86 posted on 02/01/2002 11:02:29 AM PST by VectoRama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson