Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar
ABC | 2-3-02 | Mia T

Posted on 02/03/2002 5:20:12 PM PST by Mia T

hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar, Continues to Subsist on Cozy Clintonoid Interviews of Colmes Kind
by Mia T

CEW YORK, Sunday, Feb. 3 -- Rather than courageously confronting major league media, hillary clinton continues to subsist on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Again today, clinton chose to be interviewed not by George Will et al. on the network ABC show, Sunday Morning with Sam and Cokie, but by second-string clinton lackeys on third-rate local fare that followed Sunday Morning in the New York market.

Clinton failed to exceed local performance parameters with ease, clogging the airwaves with standard-issue clinton claptrap.

By continuing to eschew the politically obligatory Sunday morning circuit and formidable inquisitors like George Will, clinton only encourages the incipient whispers of ineptitude, depravity and failure that are filling the Senate cloakroom.

 

 

In addition to this display of cowardice, ineptitude, depravity and failure, one of the more significant continuous predictors of clinton's political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know."
 
A marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity, clinton "you knows" were less frequent during this interview than during the one conducted on January 17th by Jeff Greenfield. This result is consistent with the previous finding, that the frequency of clinton "you knows" varies directly with the intensity of interviewer contempt for the clintons and inversely with the magnitude of interviewer softballs.

If hillary clinton continues to secure her politically moribund position via second-string clinton lackeys on third-rate local fare, Mort Sahl put the intellectual--if not the final--nail in the clinton legacy coffin on CNN's first-waterloo last month.

Sahl, the 60s satirist and self-professed "radical independent," who cut his political-eyeteeth at the Hungry i, announced, "I have no desire to meet clinton; with no morality, there's nothing there." That the eponymous Clinton News Network televised the demise only adds to the irony.

By way of contrast, the intrepid iconoclast, who never knew a president he didn't skewer, went on to express pride in knowing "the two Bushes," the Kennedys and Nixon.

So much for the clinton legacy.

The CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme, counterproductive on its face, is now officially dead. If the clintons had any concern for the American aesthetic, they would bury it...and themselves, while they're at it.

 

hillary's head revisited:

hillary clinton's brain (such as it is) II
 by Mia T

The smartest woman in the world would relish "the raucous give and take of American democracy, " as Charles Kuralt once put it.

hillary clinton, by contrast, subsists on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind...

In her new book, Political Fictions, Joan Didion indicts the fakery of access journalism practiced by vacant politicos like the clintons, whom she sees as "purveyors of fables of their own making, or worse, fables conceived by political strategists with designs on votes, not news."

(More Didion: "No one who ever passed through an American public high school could have watched William Jefferson Clinton running for office in 1992 and failed to recognize the familiar predatory sexuality of the provincial adolescent.")

 

THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT:

Analyzed and Annotated

by Mia T

January 22, 2002

 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE [YOU KNOW] 'UPDATED'

 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind-scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule.

Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenfield.

A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenfield made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. (Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenfield did eventually ask the ugly questions.)

Analysis:

Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a nonlinear least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.

Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter.

ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character).

Results:

  • clinton rigor mortis rendered any discussion of clinton moribundity moot.
  • Nonetheless, one of the more significant continuous predictors of political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know," a marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity.
  • clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows," himself. (There is a cautionary tale here for wannabe clintonoid lapdogs.)
  • Frequency of clinton "you knows" varied directly with intensity of Greenfield contempt and inversely with magnitude of Greenfield softballs.
  • clinton confirmed my hypothesis of Rubin complicity in a clinton coup. See "The Daschle Scheme".

GREENFIELD: Tonight, a conversation with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the nation and the world after September 11, on GREENFIELD AT LARGE.

THE COMPLETE ANNOTATED INTERVIEW (NB: a very long, you know, download because of the, you know, clinton criminal, you know, redundancy.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/03/2002 5:20:13 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Excellent! Love ya, Mia T!
2 posted on 02/03/2002 5:24:11 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
BTTT for nice work.
3 posted on 02/03/2002 5:24:54 PM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
good job Mia...I loved it.
4 posted on 02/03/2002 5:28:33 PM PST by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; river rat; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; Slyfox...
Q ERTY1 Q ERTY2 Q ERTY3 Q ERTY4 Q ERTY5 Q ERTY6
(the clintons were utter failures and the GOP had better exploit it) BUMP!

5 posted on 02/03/2002 5:52:50 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Another 'touchdown'........great job, Mia.
6 posted on 02/03/2002 6:01:28 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T






7 posted on 02/03/2002 6:12:32 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
yup we like these!
8 posted on 02/03/2002 6:43:23 PM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
"Just an old, die hard, Republican!"

The best kind! :o)

9 posted on 02/03/2002 6:52:08 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hillary would be a fool to do anything other than what she is doing. It's worked for her. Her so-called listening sessions, which were staged shows worked. Her staged town hall meetings work. She's slowly climbing back up in the polls and has three years and a book publishing to run for the presidency.
10 posted on 02/03/2002 6:52:57 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Hey, thanks for the smiley! I love smileys. :-)
11 posted on 02/03/2002 6:59:38 PM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
LOL! You know, Your pictures are like, you know, Priceless! You know, I am, you know, just laughing, you know, like you know, crazy, you know?
12 posted on 02/03/2002 7:01:21 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hillary is such an obviously evil person, yet she still manages to get elected to high office. What more can be said about her here. Could she be the anti-christ? Just a random thought.
13 posted on 02/03/2002 7:03:07 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I know. . . .I know. . . .I know. . . .
Thanks!
:o)
14 posted on 02/03/2002 7:07:36 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RussP
" Could she be the anti-christ? Just a random thought."

. . .Mrs. Anti-Christ perhaps?

15 posted on 02/03/2002 7:11:17 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Did I see newsclips of Hillary at the World Economic Forum in NYC?

What's she doing, setting up the "New World Order" agenda?

16 posted on 02/03/2002 8:26:54 PM PST by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
...clinton only encourages the incipient whispers of ineptitude, depravity and failure that are filling the Senate cloakroom.

This is news to me, Mia T. Do you have inside info, or have I missed something?
17 posted on 02/03/2002 8:37:47 PM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
That certainly describes the wicked witch of the north.
18 posted on 02/03/2002 8:42:36 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Your posts are normally well done. This time I complain as I try all kinds of browsers ... your reference links suck.
19 posted on 02/03/2002 8:47:34 PM PST by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mickie
Another 'touchdown'........great job, Mia.

. . .'superbowl' bump. . . :^)

20 posted on 02/03/2002 8:48:50 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
That anatomical diagram of Hildebeast is priceless, in case I forgot to tell you. Thanks for keeping tabs on her, as it's not fun first hand to read of her. (^:
21 posted on 02/03/2002 9:58:00 PM PST by boltfromblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mort Sahl put the intellectual--if not the final--nail in the clinton legacy coffin on CNN's first-waterloo last month.

It's appropriate, methinks, that you said first Waterloo--unfortunately, it appears that there won't be a single event that will bring these people down. If there were to be, it would have happened already. Death by a thousand cuts--a multitude of mini-Waterloos--seems to be the best we can hope for. It's helpful that you keep your spyglass on this loathsome creature, and hopeful when we read your reports about her inadequacies in dealing with the press.

Never lose hope.

22 posted on 02/04/2002 12:45:10 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hillary:
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Hillary, click below:
  click here >>> Hillary <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

clintonscandals:

To find all articles tagged or indexed using clintonscandals, click below:
  click here >>> clintonscandals <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)


"Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel safer yet?"
Lest Americans ever forget why the clintons, and all their enablers need to be hectored, hounded, and harried into silence, until "clintonese is only spoken in Hell," look here:

Hodgepodge O' Hillary

The Holiday *Best* of Bill Clinton & his Friends!

23 posted on 02/04/2002 12:50:38 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RLK

Hillary would be a fool to do anything other than what she is doing. It's worked for her. Her so-called listening sessions, which were staged shows worked. Her staged town hall meetings work. She's slowly climbing back up in the polls and has three years and a book publishing to run for the presidency.

10 posted on 2/3/02 7:52 PM Pacific by RLK

FOOL

What you say is true, if by 'fool' you mean, "one who acts unwisely on a given occasion"...and if you assume 9/11 did not change the calculus.

Humpty Dummies Q ERTY6 REALITY CHECK
 
But it is also true that hillary clinton would not "do anything other than what she is doing" precisely because she is a fool, and by 'fool' I mean, " a mentally deficient person; an idiot"...and because 9/11 did, indeed, change the calculus.
 
In my view, 9/11 has rendered the name "clinton" radioactive. It will take awhile for all Geiger counters to register, but they will.
 
Incipient anti-clinton sentiment is already cropping up in the most unexpected places; even the media, Hollywood and intractable blacks are beginning to understand that the clintons were utter failures, that the the clintons were the proximate cause of 9/11. Given this, no one in his right mind would ever put the clintons back in the Oval Office.

In his State of the Union speech, President Bush made precisely this point, if by counterexample:

Our first priority must always be the security of our nation... I will not wait on events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer... We can't stop short.  If we stop now -- leaving terror camps intact and terror states unchecked -- our sense of security would be false and temporary...The price of indifference would be catastrophic.

The inspiring, courageous, intelligent leadership of President Bush has placed the sorry clinton legacy in stark relief.

The smartest woman in the world would relish "the raucous give and take of American democracy, " as Charles Kuralt once put it.

hillary clinton, by contrast, subsists on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind...

In her new book, Political Fictions, Joan Didion indicts the fakery of access journalism practiced by vacant politicos like the clintons, whom she sees as "purveyors of fables of their own making, or worse, fables conceived by political strategists with designs on votes, not news."

Mia T, hillary's head revisited: hillary clinton's brain (such as it is) II

John Podhoretz recently asked, "Whence comes hillary clinton's reputation for brilliance?" For the answer, he intuitively, rather brilliantly in fact, looked to her anatomy and noted,"This isn't the first time she's shot herself in the foot."
 
...The above anatomical analysis supports the Podhoretz thesis. Notwithstanding The Pod's erroneous conclusions concerning hillary clinton's heart and nerve, he basically has it right. Anatomy is destiny...
 
Ian Hunter recently observed that our leaders are shrinking. "From a Churchill (or, for that matter, a Margaret Thatcher) to a Tony Blair; from Eisenhower to Clinton; from Diefenbaker to Joe Clark; from Trudeau to Chretien -- we seem destined to be governed by pygmies."
 
The pols understand their anatomical limitations well; they attempt to mitigate them with veneer. And so we suffer mindless alpha-beta-beelzebubba grotesquerie
 
...and rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy.

Mia T, Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy

Miss Hillary. . . strikes me as one of those innumerable people whose prose is so dull that they are reduced to using equally prosaic cusswords.

Paul Greenberg, The man is an artist: He's not just 'Slick Willie' anymore

"Hillary's people are very bright," said a well-connected Democrat yesterday. "But they think everybody else is stupid."
Stupid is as stupid does, says Off the Record. . .

OFF THE RECORD: AN OLD DOG NEEDS NEW TRICKS

Q ERTY4 hillary's typo reality check
"Hillary thinks that Tipper is an unintellectual nice lady who doesn't have a brain in her head"...

DEBORAH ORIN

BIG CHILL FOR TIPPER & HILL

 

Talk about the pot calling the kettle empty...

To paraphrase Abe Lincoln: She can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any person I know. [NOTE: Lincoln didn't know HIM.] ...

And Adlai Stevenson :In America, anybody can be co-president. That's one of the risks you take.

more


24 posted on 02/04/2002 5:57:50 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Oh, man! Can't do without it! Thanks, Mia T!
25 posted on 02/04/2002 8:06:04 AM PST by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hillary is like gun control -- the more the Democrats talk about her, the more fence sitters join Republicans. She like a recruitment banner for conservatives. Toward the end of Bill Clinton's term, democrats would look down at their feet and change the subject when talk of his administration came up. Now they do the same with Hillary. There was something about being booed by firemen that caused the change. Hard to believe that's all it took, but there is a difference now.
26 posted on 02/04/2002 8:18:05 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
It doesn't get any better than this. It explains all those suckerfish (NY voters) being put on the ESA.
27 posted on 02/04/2002 9:03:02 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mia, the subject is hideous but your work is wonderful. Don't ever stop.
28 posted on 02/04/2002 12:01:05 PM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"(the clintons were utter failures and the GOP had better exploit it)"...

Truer words were never written.

BTTT

29 posted on 02/04/2002 4:03:32 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Con? Genital? Bottom? Feeder? Cow?
30 posted on 02/04/2002 4:11:02 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
That is really bad news...got any good news?, like Hillary broke her neck falling down the stairs...........
31 posted on 02/04/2002 9:06:13 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IVote2; OKSooner; yoe; Angelique; GOPJ

Even, you know, if she weren't, you know, vacuous and an utter, you know, failure...clinton corruption and the looming, you know, hoosegow would, you know, keep her pinned under the, you know, radar...

 

 

clinton: "There isn't a shred of evidence."

"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

Mia T, Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton Effectively Pleads 5TH in Press Conference by Invoking Spousal Privilege

Actually, of course, when the Clintons say there is "no evidence" of their wrongdoing, there is in reality an abundance of admissible evidence of whatever they are trying to deny. Consider, for example, the following standard jury instructions on the admissibility of evidence:

Jury INSTRUCTION NO. 2.00

DIRECT AND CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE; INFERENCES

Evidence means testimony, writings, material objects or other things presented to the senses and offered to prove the existence or non-existence of a fact.

Evidence is either direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence proves a fact without an inference and, if true, conclusively establishes that fact. Circumstantial evidence proves a fact from which an inference of the existence of another fact may be drawn.

An inference is a deduction of fact that may logically and reasonably be drawn from another fact or group of facts established by the evidence.

The law makes no distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence as to the degree of proof required; each is a reasonable method of proof. Each is respected for such convincing force as it may carry

Jury INSTRUCTION NO. 2.26

ADMISSIONS IMPLIED FROM SILENCE OR EVASION

If you find that following the incident involved in this case that a party (1) [failed to reply] [or] [made an evasive answer] to a statement concerning such party's conduct in relation to the incident ;(2) heard and understood the statement; (3) had a reasonable opportunity to reply; (4) was in such physical and mental condition that a reasonable person in such condition could be expected to reply; and (5) the statement was made under such circumstances that it would normally call for an answer, you may, but are not required to, infer that the party adopted the statement or believed it to be true.

If you do not find each of the five circumstances to exist you must disregard any evidence of the party's silence or evasive answer

****

That the Clinton's accepted massive donations from Denise Rich, that plausibly were channeled from her ex-husband on whose behalf she sought a pardon from Clinton. The fact that a Clinton crony was involved in the last minute scheme to by-pass standard procedures for scruting of a pardon application. The fact that it is indefensible to pardon a multimillionaire fugitive on any grounds when he is unwilling to present his case in court on the merits, all combined with the fact that Clinton has been unable to present a coherent explanation of why he gave the pardon, even mistakenly, and the fact that such explanations as he has given are inconsistent and incomplete, these facts are all credible, admissible evidence of a criminal conspiracy to solicit and accept a bribe in return for undertaking an official act.

10 Posted on 02/17/2001 14:41:45 PST by Gail Wynand

 
 
HEY, HEY MARY JO!
 
So many pardons 4 sale.
 
So many rodhams & clintons to nail.
 
Hey, hey Mary Jo!
 
Can you spell R-I-C-O?
 

 

 
 
Q ERTY1 helen thomas syndrome REALITY CHECK!
 
clinton: "There isn't a shred of evidence."
 
One of the most intriguing facets of this case revolves around questions pertaining to the mechanism by which attorneys representing the traitors, the tax cheats, the drug kingpins, the money-launderers and other assorted beneficiaries of Clinton's last minute presidential pardons became aware that the normal procedures for attaining such pardons and commutations could be circumvented in the first place.

From the circumstantial evidence, we deduce that Clinton had set up a black market apparatus, and the sale of presidential pardons and commutations was its chief marketable commodities...

My two cents..
FReegards, "JohnHuang2"

1 Posted on 02/16/2001 23:49:53 PST by John

Motive Is Everything in the Marc Rich Pardon

15. Mr. Grafeld told me, referring to Judicial Watch's allegations that Commerce Department trade mission seats were sold in exchange for campaign contributions, that "(Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel) Klayman is right on target" but that he believes that the trade mission issues were "only the tip of the iceberg -- that the really big money went towards Presidential access." Mr. Grafeld indicated to me that he believes that Ms. Moss was asking for political contributions in exchange for seats on Commerce Department trade missions, likely at the direction of Hillary Rodham Clinton, but that documents showing this illegal activity had "left the building." In fact, there were effectively no security procedures at the Commerce Department to ensure that sensitive and secret documents and/or any documents which might evidence criminal activity stayed in the building. The purported letters referenced by Mr. Grafeld and Nolanda Hill could easily have "left the building" absent sufficient procedures to secure them.

---from DECLARATION OF SONYA STEWART

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 (UPI) -- President Clinton [upon the discovery of the body of Barbara Wise in the Commerce Department offices] briefly interrupted his Thanksgiving holiday weekend at Camp David Friday with a quick trip to the White House to gather data...and then returned to the mountaintop retreat...

The president, still suffering from a raspy voice, and ordered by his doctor to rest his vocal chords, carried a briefcase as he strolled to the waiting helicopter to return to Camp David. He wore a leather jacket and was followed by an aide carrying a huge box ...

Clinton reviewing inaugural plans, Helen Thomas, 29-NOV-1996

 

 

Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS

Mia T, January 3, 2002

 

The complex of symptoms associated with Helen Thomas Syndrome, (also known as 'habituated doyenne-iosis'), includes the following:

  • delusions of importance
  • tunnel vision -field of vision is so severely constricted that evidence of Pulitzer-quality stories are invariably missed...evidence like:
    • an absurd reason ("to get a book of poetry") for a Thanksgiving trip from Camp David to DC and back by a corrupt president under subpoena
    • a dead body: a Ron-Brown-posthumous, Ron-Brown-related, Thanksgiving-Day corpse in the Commerce offices
    • the deposition of Sonya Stewart, which tells us that "the trade mission issues were "only the tip of the iceberg -- that the really big money went towards Presidential access." Mr. Grafeld indicated to me that he believes that Ms. Moss was asking for political contributions in exchange for seats on Commerce Department trade missions, likely at the direction of Hillary Rodham Clinton, but that documents showing this illegal activity had "left the building."
    • "a huge box" hauled back to Camp David by said corrupt president under subpoena.
    • the Gestalt--the synthesis of the evidence -- the absurd reason for the president's Thanksgiving-Day Camp David-DC-Camp David trip; the Ron-Brown-posthumous, Ron-Brown-related, Thanksgiving-Day corpse; the Sonya Stewart deposition informing us that evidence of illegal Commerce activity had "left the building;" and "a huge box" hauled back to Camp David by said corrupt president under subpoena.
  • left-lateral curvature of the spine -combines synergistically with tunnel vision and delusional tendencies to result in a grotesque, dysfunctional reverence for the cowardly, inept, narcissistic, seditious, corrupt rapist-pig proximate cause of 9/11.

32 posted on 02/05/2002 2:08:36 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: all

 

NewsMax.com

 

Sunday, Feb. 3, 2002 11:51 a.m. EST

O'Reilly: Bush Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers

Investigators with the office of the U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District are being actively discouraged from pursuing evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the Clinton Pardongate scandal, with one insider charging that any prosecutor who tries to build a case against the former first family may actually hurt his career.

So says Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly, who made the startling cover-up allegation in his column this weekend.

"Although the Justice Department continues to say the probe is 'on the front burner', agents have told me there is little incentive to get things done," the Fox News commentator claimed. "In fact, one investigator said, if you push too hard on the case, you could find yourself in Fargo, N.D."

O'Reilly suggested that the Justice Department's go-slow regimen for probing the Clintons final White House scandal was likely instigated by the Bush White House.

"George W. Bush understands the way the game in Washington is played. You must make 'accommodations.'..... And what Bush may have given the Democrats is the assurance that he will not embarrass their party by aggressively pursuing the Marc Rich pardon investigation."

The first sign of Justice Department footdragging emerged last year, when New York attorney Ed Hayes, whose client Garland Lincecum had given prosecutors damaging evidence implicating former first brother Roger Clinton in Pardongate wrongdoing, expressed doubts about the probe.

In comments covered exclusively by NewsMax.com, Hayes told WABC radio's John Batchelor and Paul Alexander last June:

"The big issue now is does the government want to press the case. Because, for one thing, to really show whether or not there was a crime committed, you really have to question Bill Clinton. You really have to ask, 'Did Roger talk to his brother Bill about getting a pardon for Garland? Did Roger talk to anybody about getting a pardon for Garland?'"

Bill Clinton still has yet to testify. Even back then Hayes suggested that probers were being reined in on orders from Washington.

"You never know in these cases how dedicated they are to making the case. ... I think [lead Pardongate prober] Elliot Jacobson is a very conscientious prosecutor. But he does what he can do within the Justice Department."

Hayes hinted a political deal was already in the works: "You don't know whether [the Bush administration] is going to trade three federal judicial appointments in return for turning a blind eye to this." (See: Bush Justice Department Putting the Brakes on Pardongate Probe?)

O'Reilly now agrees, positing that Bush will reactivate the Clinton probe only if the GOP regains control of the Senate or if "things get rough."

"The Marc Rich pardon deal can always be used as a threat," he concluded.

Read Bill O'Reilly's full column on the Pardongate cover-up in NewsMax.com's magazine.

 

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Bush Administration
Clinton Scandals
Pardongate
Sen. Hillary Clinton

Q ERTY6 CLINTON NON-WAR ON TERROR TERROR
reality check BUMP!

Nothing less than humanity, itself, will forever be in the debt of Pres. Bush for having had the courage to take on terrorism FOR REAL. (See:The Real Danger of a Presidential Faker: Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo Presidency)

But that does not excuse Bush's less-than-courageous decision not to expend political capital to go after clinton corruption. Not to do so threatens democracy--perhaps more slowly--but just as surely as terrorism does. In fact, it would not be a stretch to call the clinton crimes "domestic terrorism."

Frankly, the incestuous, dynastic, professional nature of the current political structure, together with the clintons' limitless access to dark secrets via Filegate, etc., suggest an even less honorable reason than simple politics for Bush's apparent decision "to move on."

Personally, I'm sick of this rerun. How many times does history need to repeat itself before we, the people say "enough!"???

 

 

by Mia T
 
Not Joe Klein's Primary Colors. And not Jack Stanton.
bill clinton is straight out of
Stanley Kubrick's A CLOCKWORK ORANGE.
 
clinton is Alex,
one of the few truly amoral characters in either film or literature;
not quite as Kubrick (or Burgess) had imagined him, however,
but rumpled, wrinkled, paunchy, edematous,
stripped of the youth-excuse
after 30 additional, pathetic, recidivistic years
of marauding, stomping, raping, gangbanging, deceiving and destroying.
 
Like A CLOCKWORK ORANGE, the story of bill clinton
is the story about a society that has lost its capacity for moral choice.
But unlike in the less fabulous and no more ironic fable,
clinton is not mere nascent symbol but nihilistic agent.
 
clinton, like Alex, is the leader of the gang, the "droogies."
Eerily prefigured by the rocking, crooked phallus,
clinton's a conscienceless sadist
who thrills at risk and gratuitous destruction,
whose sexual and non-sexual impotence
is at the root of his obsession with "the old inout."
 
When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.
 
A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.
 
While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.
 
In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
 
We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.
 

 


33 posted on 02/05/2002 2:14:02 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yoe
That Hillary is the most evil political presence I've seen in my lifetime, including Hitler, is true. Hover, that should not detract from the reality that she is highly successful and good at what she she does. Better to admit it now than find out, still again, later.
34 posted on 02/05/2002 5:43:00 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RLK
If the clintons were "good at what they do," they wouldn't have been impeached, they wouldn't be facing indictment, they wouldn't have been exposed as depraved, rapist-pig, utter failures, they wouldn't be the laughingstock of the world; and they would have snared their coveted Nobel Peace Prize...
 
You seem to be missing the essence of the clintons.
They are a farce of farce ad infinitum...
 
 
they are the paradoxical personification of nothingness...
 
 
The story of the clintons is a mock documentary about a non-entity that takes on the characteristics of whatever strong or useful personality it comes in contact with.
 
The clinton presidency seemed small, and there was a reason for it:
there weren't any characters in it.
 
The clintons proved what Woody Allen's Zelig merely hypothesized: the erroneousness of the almost universally held postulate that everyone is someone.
 

PREDICTION:The continuous "leaks" denying presidential aspirations coming from hillary clinton's "infrastructure" -- as well as convenient "pres--uh--I mean, you know, senator, HA HA" slips-of-the-tongue from the W I D E B O D Y. low-center-of-gravity predator, herself -- will continue unabated through '08 in the hopes of conferring legitimacy on this inept, depraved, unaccomplished, repulsive fraud.

The clinton scheme: a non-announcement of a non-campaign by a non-entity to make that non-entity someone. The first law of thermodynamics ensures failure.

As does 9/11. Post 9/11, few are mindless enough to put another clinton in the Oval Office.

9/11 made the clinton name radioactive. It may take a bit of time for all Geiger counters to register, but they will. Already 2/3 of New Yorkers polled say they NEVER want this --uh -- woman to run for president.

 

Q ERTY6 the clintons were utter failures and everyone knows it REALITY CHECK

 
"I have no infrastructure to deal with this."

bill clinton

 

 

One of the unintended consequences of America's rejection of mandated political correctness is that legends crumble.
 
The classic case is that of Bill Clinton. The conventional wisdom has been (even from his critics) that notwithstanding policy and philosophy disagreements Bill Clinton was/is a smart, charming, even brilliant man.
 
The reality that is becoming increasingly clear to those willing to see is that "The President Clinton Package" and his team of advisers, managers, and spin doctors, were smart, charming and at times brilliant. However, left to his own devices and without the support, advice, counsel and coercive powers of office, Bill is (for the second time in two months) emphatically demonstrating he ain't all that smart.
 

Bill's big yap:

Geoff Metcalf slams Clinton's foot-in-mouth sophistry

 
 
See also:
 
Can the President Think?
 
THE MYTH OF HILLARY'S BRILLIANCE
 
Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
 
OFF THE RECORD: AN OLD DOG NEEDS NEW TRICKS
 
The man is an artist: He's not just 'Slick Willie' anymore
 
Hey, what a party!
New Year's at the White House
 
hillary's head revisited:
hillary clinton's brain (such as it is) II
 
Senator Dim Bulb by Gary Aldrich © 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
Annotated by Mia T
 
hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar,
Continues to Subsist on Cozy Clintonoid Interviews of Colmes Kind

35 posted on 02/05/2002 12:57:26 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Memo to Hillary:

If I may quote from the hero firefighters at the VH-1 charity concert, upon seeing your ample buttocks intruding on the stage and hearing your chalk-on-the-blackboard voice,

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

36 posted on 02/05/2002 1:05:17 PM PST by TheGoodDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Great post, you caught the intire essence of the clintons. There is no bottom to how low hillary, and bill will go. The greatest shame of this country, is it allowed these 2 scumbags to occupy the Whitehouse, and to spread their poison from the Presidency.
37 posted on 02/05/2002 1:25:34 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
What you said on post#34 can only be true, if the clinton monkeys continue to work for these evil couple. Perhaps the stink that the clintons continue to generate will eventually suffocate the liberal media, that their survival becomes their major issue, thereby dumping the clintons.
38 posted on 02/05/2002 1:48:55 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: desertcry
DEATH BY MISREPORT: 4TH-ESTATE MALFEASANCE AND 9/11

Q ERTY6 (clinton was an utter failure) 4th-Estate Malfeasance REALITY CHECK bump!

39 posted on 02/05/2002 3:15:46 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Let's get serious. The Clinton impeachment is meaningless except to people such as the people who come here. If the Clintons were capable of embarrassment it might bother them, but such is not the case. In fact, the Clintons have not suffered damages from it. Bill is still running around the world acting as if he were still president, uncontested, at fees for up to $200,000 a night. He has a $12,000,000 book deal plus a sizable pension. Hillary has an $8,000,000 advance on her book. She is the biggest single crowd drawer in the country other than Bubba, and is the top fund raiser in the Democratic party. Both have solid media support. She's occupying a senate seat from a stae where she was never a resident and is one of the most powerful figures in the senate. Where have they been damaged? Forget posting any more cartoons, they have yet to be damaged and they haven't worked a day in their lives for most of nearly 30 years.
40 posted on 02/05/2002 3:53:30 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RLK
The Clintins are looked upon as Gods by many tens of millions of people in America and by hundreds of millions in foreign countries. Correct me if I'M wrong.
41 posted on 02/05/2002 4:05:42 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RLK

 

IMO, you are absolutely wrong. Even by your measure--money--they fail; with their legal fees and fines, they've yet to break even--even with their personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster. (see Is hillary clinton's $8M "book advance" a Peter-Principle artifact?)

And if you think these two narcissists aren't suffering, you're wrong. It has nothing to do with shame. It has to do with legacy and worship and power. The clintons must limit public appearances to handpicked groups of sycophants at handpicked sites like Berkeley and Israel or risk being booed off the stage...and worse. The military had to be disarmed when clinton visited Bosnia.

Poetic justice in the end: clinton--both clintons, in fact--are prisoners (both Cartesian and Freudian) of their own depravity, imprisioned in the hermetic confines of an evil, narcissistic life. Their world will finally and fittingly become as small as they, themselves, are...


42 posted on 02/05/2002 4:23:08 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: desertcry
Feb. 2, 2002
 
RE: Dem IQ & O'Reilly PC
 
Hey Bill -
 
I'm expending my valuable time to write to you on the theory that a working journalist should strive to be no more than half as dumb as a Democrat seeking office.
 
To borrow from Dick Nixon on paranoia --
Just because you're in your politically correct mode doesn't mean that the Democrats aren't as dumb as doornails, Rush Limbaugh notwithstanding...
 
The proof of the pudding is, as they say, in the eating -- or in this case -- in 9/11 and its aftermath.
 
Choosing to erode a wartime president as they demagogue rights that would be meaningless post-Armageddon, the Democrats demonstrate their total cluelessness; the Democrats fail to understand that "it's the terrorism, stupid" -- amazingly, even today, (post-"it's the economy, stupid" clintons), as new revelations emerge of apocalyptic al-Qaeda targeting that includes nuclear installations, for heaven's sake.
 
Enough with the P.C., Bill.
Time to invoke F.G. (Forrest Gump)
 
"Stupid is as stupid does."
Democrats are dumb.
 
Post-9/11, it is axiomatic.
 
 
Sincerely,
Mia T
Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars
 
BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."
 
THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF
 
by Mia T, January 31, 2002
 

by any measure, the Carville-Shrum scheme to attack Bush by clintonoid compartmentalization ("praise the Bush war effort / pan the Bush character and economy") isn't working. Ask any pollster or pundit. 

It's the terrorism...and character...stupid

The Carville-Shrum scheme fails because the schemers fail to understand that terrorism necessarily subsumes the economy, that "it's the terrorism, stupid," to paraphrase Carville. The Carville-Shrum scheme fails also because the schemers fail to understand that bill clinton, to paraphrase Lloyd Benson, is no George Bush...and conversely...and the people know it.
 
But perhaps the most compelling reason that the Carville-Shrum scheme fails is that it is a fraud...and the people know it.
 

Compartmentalization scheme a fraud

Does anyone still sentient after eight years of the clintons really believe that the clintons and their "infrastructure" really want Bush to succeed where the co-rapists failed so utterly?

To sabotage Bush is merely to extend into realtime the method of legacy-building historically preferred by the clintons; that is, trash other presidents in an effort to hoist their own sorry collective heft from history's dustbin.

The clintons are constitutionally incapable of understanding that the bottom line is not power or money or Nobel Peace Prizes, and certainly not misbegotten power or money or Nobel Peace Prizes.

They and their minions continue to undermine the Bush war effort even as they assume poses and mouth poll-tested phrases to the contrary. But Bush sees right through this.

In his State of the Union speech, Bush told us:

Our first priority must always be the security of our nation... I will not wait on events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer... We can't stop short.  If we stop now -- leaving terror camps intact and terror states unchecked -- our sense of security would be false and temporary...The price of indifference would be catastrophic.

This was a direct blow to the collective clinton scheme...and paunch...and legacy.


43 posted on 02/06/2002 1:59:44 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: all
Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars
 
BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."
 
THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF
 
by Mia T, January 31, 2002
Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering, by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

 

by any measure, the Carville-Shrum scheme to attack Bush by clintonoid compartmentalization ("praise the Bush war effort / pan the Bush character and economy") isn't working. Ask any pollster or pundit. 

It's the terrorism...and character...stupid


44 posted on 02/06/2002 3:11:27 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
By way of contrast, the intrepid iconoclast, who never knew a president he didn't skewer, went on to express pride in knowing "the two Bushes," the Kennedys and Nixon.

Gotta love ol' Mort Sahl. No doubt about it. (Your lastest Helen Thomas review is 100% ROFLMASSO !!!! )

45 posted on 02/06/2002 3:22:57 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
bump for future amusement
46 posted on 02/06/2002 3:27:21 AM PST by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows," himself. (There is a cautionary tale here for wannabe clintonoid lapdogs.)

I, you know, LOVED the analysis and results of hillary's, you know, slipping off the cozy, media protected and safeguarded platform. You know...it is ALL TRUE. Perhaps her days of, you know, HIDING behind the alan colme's of this world are over. The attempt at, you know, 'gravitas' (lol) has backfired and perhaps, you know, our heinous would be empress is finally, you know, being exposed in all her naked glory....(using, you know, the term 'glory' very loosely!)

47 posted on 02/06/2002 3:40:48 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Your post#40, there is indeed no justice in this world, is there? We will just have to be patient eternally, and eternity is a verrrrrrryyyyy long time.
48 posted on 02/06/2002 8:56:36 AM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
An "Oink" for Hitlery & the senescent Helen Thomas!
49 posted on 02/07/2002 8:47:47 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson