Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH TO DUB: IT'S GUT CHECK TIME ( Stand up for free speech. Veto this bill Mr. President)
rushlimbaugh ^ | 2/15/2002 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/16/2002 7:27:55 AM PST by TLBSHOW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-319 last
To: sneakypete
The "Clintnoids" have nothing on the "Bush-Bots".

LOL. Yep, they look the same to me. Spin, spin, spin.

301 posted on 02/17/2002 6:51:33 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Why do you think I call him "Bubba Bush"?

That this name has the ring of truth to it shows how Bush was studying the tactics of der Slickmeister during his 8-year reign of terror.

302 posted on 02/17/2002 6:57:03 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
bump
303 posted on 02/17/2002 7:06:02 PM PST by JeepInMazar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

Comment #304 Removed by Moderator

Comment #305 Removed by Moderator

To: LS
A pocket veto is not available, as you point out, Congress will be in session when the clock expires.

rwfromkansas says in 231 that the bill has a provision that says it becomes law in 10 days if the President does not veto it. (Seems like usurpation of executive powers to me)

306 posted on 02/17/2002 7:35:16 PM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
That provision, then, is de facto unconstitutional, as is the section that says you can find one part unconstitutional, but not others.
307 posted on 02/18/2002 8:36:39 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: oldvike
bump
308 posted on 02/18/2002 9:54:33 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
another bump to the top
309 posted on 02/18/2002 11:21:21 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Check out the rules. NO personal attacks. NO foul abuse. Your post is the most obscene thing I have seen on FR. But then again, that was your point, wasn't it?

I'm apologize for being crude, but I am mad enough to throw Molotovs over this asinine bill. The last thing I need when I'm stirred up (although I can't say it justifies what I wrote) is for Dubya's patriot thought police to come knocking on my door questioning my patriotism. I resent that. Besides, the very fact that he's considering signing the thing puts his very courage and integrity, when it comes to his Presidential oath to uphold our Constitution, in question.

Again, I unequivocally stand AGAINST this bill, PERIOD, and I believe it is my PATRIOTIC duty to do so. If you are not a Kool-aid-drinking Bushie, I again apologize. If you ARE one, I retract my original apology.

310 posted on 02/18/2002 11:58:51 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW; 3-D JOY
PLEASE!!

Your Language is not necessary !

Fine, I'll remember to mention the appropriate anatomy next time...

Seriously, though, I tried to make amends with the patriot thought police over yonder...

311 posted on 02/18/2002 12:04:37 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: thatsnotnice
Um...nope. Not appealing to me. I can't stand Clinton, but more importantly, I can't stand the sentiment expressed by either president.
312 posted on 02/18/2002 12:50:44 PM PST by Anti-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
There is a link to a site that mentions serval cases of spoofing and mis-representation in websites. A site that is an attempt to con people into mis-representing what they are seeing indeed is a candidate for "limit on freedom", or at least a lawsuit. Or do you think it might be humorous to buy a box labelled cereal and find a dead rat in it?

That's the argument the president tried to use, but he ran into a couple of problems. First, his campaign had already purchased many negative domain names (bushsucks.com) and redirected them to his campaign site. Thus, if gwbush.com was guilty, the Bush campaign was much more so. More importantly, the site was a parody, and as such, was justified in using the domain name. The Bush campaign's arguments were tossed out of court without so much as a trial.

313 posted on 02/18/2002 12:56:22 PM PST by Anti-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I'm not one, but I don't think there are many, either. I don't know a single person who agrees with every position the President has. I know many who believe that he is the man God has chosen to begin to lead this nation out of its moral decadence. I also do not believe in withdrawing support for a single issue......even this one, but I need to hear an explanation.

That being said, I am deeply troubled by this bill. We have called both our (Republican) Senators voicing our objection to it, and our Congressman thanking him for his opposition to it. I don't know where the President will come down on it, and I don't know what explanation he will give for his position, so I am withholding judgement on him until that is known. In regard to the Congress, it seems that the gutless Republican wonders are back in form. I believe the President has a great deal of courage to 'go against the flow,' and to tell you the truth, I am praying that he will use that courage to veto this terrible bill, no matter what the cost.

314 posted on 02/18/2002 1:42:20 PM PST by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I believe the President has a great deal of courage to 'go against the flow,' and to tell you the truth, I am praying that he will use that courage to veto this terrible bill, no matter what the cost.

AAAAAAAAA-MEN!

As far as support, I voted for him once due to FOG (Fear of Gore), but I recognized that his platform seemed to be part socialist, so I'm HIGHLY critical of him, except for the war effort so far. If he signs this demonic bill, I'll still support him in the war and on tax cuts, but don't look for me to punch him in on the 2004 ballot. After all, those hours spent standing outside of Cheney's house have to be worth something.

315 posted on 02/18/2002 6:49:15 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Bumpity-Bump
316 posted on 02/21/2002 11:58:31 AM PST by Grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Send a real post card to W. They have some nice patriotic designs.
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

317 posted on 02/21/2002 12:04:41 PM PST by Grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grit

318 posted on 02/21/2002 12:40:28 PM PST by One4Indictment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Grit
Pmubbity-pmub!
319 posted on 02/21/2002 2:43:12 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-319 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson