Skip to comments.
Evolution debate: State board should reject pseudoscience
Columbus Dispatch ^
| February 17, 2002
| Editorial
Posted on 02/18/2002 4:59:53 AM PST by cracker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,421-1,440 next last
To: 1/1,000,000th%
Yes.
Kind of like another line of mine - when faced with intermediate transitional fossils (e.g., dino-bird series), the Creationist continues to ask whether pink is red or white.
21
posted on
02/19/2002 5:33:36 AM PST
by
cracker
To: Junior
"
We've got a whole lot of these folks on this forum... I have looked at thousands of posts by evolutionists on this forum. I have seen people beg them for proof of macro-evolution, proof of anything supporting evolution, and they can never come up with any.
Now you and your friends will rant and scream at me for saying the above. You will insult me, you will attack my character and use other fould METHODS to try to discredit my statement but this I can assure anyone reading this post:
NOT ONE, NOT ONE EVOLUTIONIST WILL POST PROOF OF MACRO-EVOLUTION - BECAUSE THERE IS NONE. BECAUSE THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY PROOF OF EVOLUTION IN THE 150 YEARS SINCE THE CHARLATAN CHARLES DARWIN WROTE HIS HEATHEN BOOK.
22
posted on
02/19/2002 7:40:50 PM PST
by
gore3000
To: lexcorp
"
As Pakicetus and Ambulocetus show." Oh really?
SHOW ME THE BONES!
More importantly, show me the proof of the evolution. Bones are meaningless. There are millions of species now alive. They range from one celled creatures to the most complicated of all - man. Yet in 20 years of DNA tracing the evolutionists have never been able to show a single straight line between divergent species. In fact, DNA tracing has shown most of the evolutionists assumptions about what species "evolved" from each other as total bunk.
23
posted on
02/19/2002 7:49:30 PM PST
by
gore3000
To: gore3000
I have seen people beg them for proof of macro-evolution, proof of anything supporting evolution, and they can never come up with any. So, the dozen or so speciation links on The Ultimate Resource magically disappeared before you could read them? Or did you just ignore them so that you could, in good conscience, continue to spout the inanities for which you have become infamous?
24
posted on
02/20/2002 1:59:30 AM PST
by
Junior
To: Junior
So, the dozen or so speciation links on The Ultimate Resource magically disappeared before you could read them? Or did you just ignore them so that you could, in good conscience, continue to spout the inanities for which you have become infamous?My vote is for the latter. :)
To: cracker
Just as with gravity, evolution is a fact.
Just as with gravity(santa claus), evolution(Easter bunny) is a fact(real)...tooth fairy(nea) too!
To: f.Christian
Just as with gravity(santa claus)I gather you equate the reality of gravity the same as you would Santa Claus? LOL!!
To: Gridley_here
This guy needs to get at clue, the Theory of Evolution is the Satinsts creation story.You are entitled to your opinion, am I entitled to mine?
28
posted on
02/20/2002 4:44:42 AM PST
by
Scully
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: RadioAstronomer
What evolution teaches is fantasy--anti-gravity---fairy tales. A lot of mass entertainment at movie theatres is based on the suspension of reality...sorta of the art--science of modern public education---mass hype--hypnosis...disappearing reality--magic!
To: f.Christian
What evolution teaches is fantasy--anti-gravity---fairy tales.Nope. Evolution is the best model we have to date that describes the diversity and development of life here on this planet. I suggest you really sit down, take a month and read the links that PatrickHenry and Junior have so thoughtfully provided. It may give you a new perspective/outlook on the living world.
To: cracker
reject evolution as pseudoscience
32
posted on
02/20/2002 12:46:57 PM PST
by
Khepera
To: RadioAstronomer
Why bother...God would have to be lame---incompetent to come up with that rubbish--evolution!
Just the reason you like it too!
To: f.Christian
Just the reason you like it too!Really? Why do you say this?
To: RadioAstronomer
Ask OJ Simpson!
To: f.Christian
Just the reason you like it too!Ask OJ Simpson!
Please be more clear. I still am not following your argument.
To: RadioAstronomer
I've always looked at it this way. If someone cannot say that it is possible that future evidence might discredit a holy book, or that new discoveries might cause one to think that the tenents of a religion are false, or that empirical evidence might discredit a philosophical or religious idea, then the book, tenent or idea is not scientific.
Everything in science is open to future revision based upon new evidence. Everything. If a religious theory cannot abide by the same rule, that it might be seen as false in light of new evidence, then it doesn't ask or answer a scientific question.
37
posted on
02/20/2002 12:56:40 PM PST
by
BikerNYC
To: RadioAstronomer
(getting away with murder--assassination--theft--fraud)
To: RadioAstronomer
Please be more clear. I still am not following your argument. If you are expecting coherent discourse from him, you're in for a very long wait.
To: BikerNYC
Hmmmm.. I have always agreed with that. Did I come across wrong? I do not believe in evolution. I "know" evolution is the most valid scientific model we have (it is not a belief system like religion). The physical evidence is overwhelming.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,421-1,440 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson