Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex offenders may face fees to register
thebeaconjournal.com ^ | Wed, Feb. 27, 2002 | Stephanie Warsmith

Posted on 02/27/2002 9:12:31 AM PST by Gun142

Sex offenders may face fees to register

Counties could recover costs under proposal
By Stephanie Warsmith
Beacon Journal staff writer

Sex offenders would be charged a fee when they register with county sheriffs' offices under a bill introduced yesterday by a local lawmaker.

The bill is aimed at recouping the costs for local law enforcement authorities to enforce the state's Megan's Law, which requires those convicted of sex offenses -- and labeled sex offenders -- to register with the sheriff's office in the county where they live.

``Sheriffs' offices may not be able to keep up with this without a revenue stream,'' said Sen. Kevin Coughlin, R-Cuyahoga Falls, the bill's sponsor.

Coughlin introduced the bill at the request of Summit County Sheriff Drew Alexander, who complained about the rising cost of enforcing Megan's law. Alexander estimates his office spends about $60,000 a year to keep a registry of the offenders.

Under Coughlin's bill, sexual predators -- the most serious designation for sexual offenders -- would pay a $100 annual fee. All other sexual offenders would be charged $50 a year.

The fee would be waived for those who prove they are unable to pay it. Sheriffs' offices would have the option of setting up payment plans or not charging the fee if they think the money is not needed.

But Alexander said the extra money is definitely needed in Summit County, which has about 450 registered sexual offenders, including 35 sexual predators. A list of the registered offenders is maintained on the sheriff's office's Web site.

Alexander said the number of registered offenders will continue to grow as those sentenced under Megan's Law are released from prison. The sheriff's office is now required to keep track of juvenile sex offenders as well as adults.

``We are stretching our personnel to the max,'' he said. ``We have people working on this who are assigned to other jobs.''

Sheriffs' offices must pay for fingerprinting, photographs and postage. They also have to dedicate employees to type the registration information, do door-to-door notifications and investigate when sex offenders fail to register.

Summit County sheriff's officials soon hope to start a special unit dedicated to enforcing Megan's Law. They are working with Summit County Council members on legislation that would charge Summit County Jail inmates a ``pay-to-stay'' fee. The fee would then be used for a sexual offender unit, made up of three detectives.

``We think it is critical for law enforcement to properly monitor this offender group,'' said Assistant Summit County Sheriff Larry Givens.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ohio

1 posted on 02/27/2002 9:12:31 AM PST by Gun142
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gun142;**Ohio
bump
2 posted on 02/27/2002 9:17:59 AM PST by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gun142
A new twist on the concept of "paying your debt to Society!" Too bad part of that money can't be used to cover the costs of a lifetime of therapy for the victims.
3 posted on 02/27/2002 9:27:04 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gun142
Doea this make the deputies employees of the "sex offenders?"
4 posted on 02/27/2002 10:01:20 AM PST by rdww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdww
I think this means "Don't do the crime if you can't pay the fine".
5 posted on 02/27/2002 10:13:55 AM PST by Gun142
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gun142
Wouldn't this be an ex post facto law for those required to register before the law requiring the fee was passed?
6 posted on 02/27/2002 10:17:03 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
Good question.

It may depend on whether the fee is considered punishment or not.
Since it's not [technically] a fine and can be waived for those unable to pay, I can see how it's not a new punishment.

7 posted on 02/27/2002 10:31:28 AM PST by Gun142
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gun142
It may depend on whether the fee is considered punishment or not.
Since it's not [technically] a fine and can be waived for those unable to pay, I can see how it's not a new punishment.

There was a bill filed in Washington State this year to do much the same thing, to fund a state website. I don't know what happened but those provisions, which as I recall allowed jail time for failure to pay, disappeared from the bill in committee. (I think Justice & Corrections, but frankly I don't recall.) See http://leg.wa.gov for details.

8 posted on 02/27/2002 5:19:53 PM PST by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson