Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TWA Flight 800 - "CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS IS A LIE? I CAN'T"
Accuracy In Media ^ | Reed Irvine

Posted on 02/28/2002 9:31:30 AM PST by Asmodeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-308 next last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

Comment #143 Removed by Moderator

Comment #144 Removed by Moderator

Comment #145 Removed by Moderator

Comment #146 Removed by Moderator

To: Magician
OK. You are making it clear that there is no data showing what an ordnance explosion looks like in the vicinity of aircraft pressure instruments. Instead you offer "several skilled aircraft accident examiners who determined that these sensors had shown an overpressure". Who? Donaldson? I don't consider LSoft to be a legitimate aircraft investigation resource. Surely if the data from the FDR "perfectly recorded the over-pressure created by the explosion of the missile" you must have a control set of data to compare it to. Instead, you choose to accuse me of being a government plant because I ask you to show data which apparently doesn't exist. Typical.
147 posted on 03/04/2002 5:14:15 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: n9te
I see you're following your own advice from post #65 again... If you had ever read the NTSB report you would notice a very in depth analysis of the FDR data. And you suggest I do research?!? I'll ask you the same question that Magician can't answer. What exactly is your source stating the 1 second of FDR data in question clearly shows an overpressure from a missile? Rather then calling me names, why don't you just support your claims?
148 posted on 03/04/2002 5:23:23 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

Comment #149 Removed by Moderator

Comment #150 Removed by Moderator

To: n9te
Good morning! Lucky for you I have the day off today! I wish I had a Piper Apache. Looks like fun but I couldn't afford it. Almost all my time is jet. I take it from your post that you now want me to find the data to support your theories? That might be difficult, because I don't think it exists. As far as slamming anybody is concerned, I'll leave that to the experts. I'll limit my comments to requests that people provide some kind of support for their claims. So far, that seems to be enough of a slam.
151 posted on 03/04/2002 6:02:48 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

Comment #152 Removed by Moderator

Comment #153 Removed by Moderator

To: n9te
Do you double as Michael Rivero?

You're pretty salty for a guy who's only been aboard a month.

154 posted on 03/04/2002 6:52:24 AM PST by a6intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: n9te
Do you double as Michael Rivero?

You're pretty salty for a guy who's only been aboard a month.

155 posted on 03/04/2002 6:53:19 AM PST by a6intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Haven't seen this one. Thanks, Fred.
156 posted on 03/04/2002 7:03:14 AM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

Comment #158 Removed by Moderator

To: pittsburgh gop guy
>>...How could the sub have "...debris falling around them on film from the periscope" if it was doing "...an emergency dive...<<

Could have been the lighter stuff falling down later after the sub had come back up to scope depth.

We were still tracking falling debris 45 minutes after the Challenger explosion. (course, they were 10 miles high when it happened)

159 posted on 03/04/2002 7:32:55 AM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: n9te
The point I,m trying to make on this is that when you intermingle politics & corruption with the fabrication of this crash report, certain things happen to blur the picture, resulting in people here using incomplete or scewed data to reach conclusions.

I don't want to initiate a long and protracted debate on a side subject that will lead to nothing, but I don't find any documentation that politics and/or corruption on the part of any official involved in the TWA 800 investigation has been alledged or proven. Overwhelmingly asserted by several very vocal and unrelenting individuals, I'll admit. But nothing of substance offered in proof.

The other thing that bothers me personally, is the limits to which people, armed with the incomplete or skewed data, will go in defending their conclusion, however (and most often) fatally flawed it may be.

Freegards...

160 posted on 03/04/2002 7:41:20 AM PST by a6intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-308 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson