Posted on 03/04/2002 10:49:56 AM PST by A.J.Armitage
And why's that?
Because your essay suggested that there is no reason for a statutory age of majority, without which children and adults would be the same in the eyes of the law.
As far as I know, there are only 2 things that an 18 year old can not do and that is buy alcohol and buy a handgun. All other privileges and responsibilities of adulthood are bestowed on them at 18.
The First Amendment did not apply to the states until the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. I believe it did, and I believe the founders agree with me. Why make a BoR that only applies to the Fed gov, which is supposed to be a very small faction with little function. The states are where criminal laws are tried. Why address cruel and unusual punishment, when the STATES are the majority of the prosecutors? The BoR have always applied to the States. The 14th just solidified that.It's debatable whether it did or not before the 14th Amendment. For example the Congregational Church was not disestablished in Connecticut until 1818.
Once the Fourteenth was ratified, it was no longer debatable.
-Eric
Well call me a smart-a$$, but I think you're a dumb-a$$ if you believe young people are going to sit in their homes and drink and never end up getting into a car to drive it! You're not so old that you shouldn't remember doing stupid things when you were younger!By your logic we should ban alcohol, since even older people might drink and then get into a car.I'm just saying I'd rather err on the side of protecting innocent victims from immature, irresponsible people
Perhaps then we should ban skydiving, because these "immature, irresponsible people" might land on someone.
-Eric
Rent a car, some counties, you have to be 21 to purchase XXX material. Some states you must be 19 to buy cigarettes. Gotta be 35 to run for president......
See post #229.
EBUCK
that is INCORRECT.
As a former Marine and a current govt contractor that works on a Marine base I can tell you that Bases follow the state & Federal laws.
Back in the day you could drink beer & wine in NC if you were over 18 and hard liquor if you were over 21.
That rule no longer applies. Everyone has gone to a 21 yr old age limit for any alcohol.
Many Enlisted Clubs are closed and the whole Club system is shot because of this and the crackdown on drinking in the military.
EBUCK
Just for this one area, not for everything. I certainly wouldn't say a three year old can consent to have sex, for example.
It is not drinking at 18 or 20 that is the problem. It is the indiscriminate use (over indulging) that is the danger. Many young people have insufficient development to be cognizant of the risks. Common sense, please.
"Abuse" is the entry to 'micro managing' the people. We are willingly giving away our freedom. On one hand the government is giving us medical care and we welcome it and receive it: the other hand comes with all sorts of rules and regulations tied to the medical care. Just like schools ... or any other program you want to look at thoroughly.
Haven't we figured out how this game is played. Evidently not. We keep thinking we are getting more than we are giving away. WRONG!
It is about POWER and MONEY. The government's ... and ours. They get more and more ... we give more and more. ... they win ... we lose. We are aiding and abetting our own loss of freedom and liberty.
Why not just tape a sign on the seat of your pants that says "KICK ME"?
When my 15 year old son gets your 11 year old daughter drunk and has "consensual" sex with her, come tell me about "coercively achieved social perfection" and let me laugh at you.
The lawyers will love a society like the one you envision.
Let me know when it happens to your daughter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.