Posted on 12/10/2002 8:45:04 AM PST by blam
Put down the lipstick if you value his sperm
December 10 2002 at 07:32AM
By Laura MacInnis
Washington - Everyday exposure to a chemical ingredient used to preserve many cosmetics and fragrances may contribute to sperm damage in adult men, according to a study published on Monday.
In one of the first studies of the effects of substances known as phthalates on humans, Harvard University researchers found signs of correlation between exposure to a common type of the chemical and damage to the DNA of human sperm.
The study, published in the government journal Environmental Health Perspectives, does not show whether this DNA damage could leave men infertile or cause birth defects, said the researchers.
'This paper shows early findings in a relatively small number of men' Last month, the United States Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel, an industry-sponsored watchdog, sparked fury from health and environmental lobbyists when it voted to allow the continued use of three types of phthalates in perfumes and beauty products, saying they were safe in their current uses.
Phthalates, used to make fragrances last longer and to soften plastics like baby toys, have been linked in previous studies to birth defects in animals, but no evidence has proved they are harmful to humans.
The American Chemistry Council maintains that phthalates are safe and the US government so far has declined to limit their use.
But the European Union banned their use in some products, including baby toys, in 1999.
The study, conducted at a Massachusetts fertility clinic, analysed urine and semen samples from 168 men believed to have normal levels of exposure to diethyl phthalates through the use of cosmetics products and plastics.
Russ Hauser, a Harvard University School of Public Health professor and senior author of the study, said preliminary results suggested exposure to those phthalates was associated with increased DNA damage in sperm, but said it was too early to tell how severe the damage was.
"What the significance of it is, we don't know. What it predicts in terms of end points in the fetus or child is really unclear at this point," he.
Hauser said his group planned to extend its research to include between 700 and 800 men in order to verify the findings, and to cross-reference results with findings of other studies measuring factors like pregnancy success rates.
"This paper shows early findings in a relatively small number of men," he said. "Our next step here really is to expand the study, and repeat the analyses."
But a group that has been fighting the use of phthalates, Health Care Without Harm, said the study showed they were right.
"The correlation found in this study is extremely troubling and deserves urgent follow up," said Dr Ted Schettler, the science director of the Science and Environmental Health Network in a statement on behalf of the group.
Have you been married so long you forgot?
"Nearly eight years. Man, it has been a long time..."
working on year 27 here, you have no idea or a clue... then again after 27 years I haven't got a memory, clue or idea.
Take charge of your situation, Junior. Demand what is rightfully yours.
Means you too are wearing a lot of lip gloss ;-)
I guess I am rare. I return the favor, happily.
LOL! There's nothing to bite on- it's the God's honest truth. She doesn't use the hairbrush now either- just technically, she owns one because I do. And yes, she showers, towels dry (hair too) and runs her fingers through it and musses it up and lets it dry like that- always has. She can be ready quicker than I can. She used to be an athlete- cross country skier (German National Team to be exact). She's pretty down to earth...
I think she's the prettiest woman I ever saw- but then the first time I met her, I told a buddy who was with me "I'm going to marry that woman" and I did. This might be my own particular taste but I know what I like.
It's not all that unusual though. Lot's of German women don't use makeup. If you go your whole life without using any, your skin will have a naturally healty color to it. I mean, rouge is a device to "add color" to the cheeks to make them look like you've been out in the elements. If you just let your skin go natural your whole life- more than likely you'll get that effect without having to donate to the makeup industry. My wife, being an outdoors type person and physically active has just always had a rosy glow to her face- I think makeup would actually detract from her looks. But it's not just that. My wife is a genuinely good and nice person. I've seen complete strangers come up to her on the street and tell her she's got a "happy face" (no joke). A natural demeanor like that will take you further than cosmetics or raw beauty ever will.
After I got used to seeing women the way they naturally look, eyeliner, lipstick and so forth took on an "artificial" and unnattractive appearance (IMHO anyway). It's a cultural thing really. I didn't notice it at first when I moved away from the States, but after a while I did and grew to appreciate it. To each his own I guess...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.