Skip to comments.
Man arrested in connection with Molotov cocktail discovered at S.F. protest
Sac Bee ^
| 4/2/03
| AP - San Francisco
Posted on 04/02/2003 10:23:01 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:50:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A man has been arrested in connection with the discovery of a Molotov cocktail device found outside an office building during one of the recent anti-war protests, The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and police announced Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: antiwar; arrested; cocktail; connection; law; molotov; protester; sanfrancisco
To: NormsRevenge
Sounds like a terrorist to me.
2
posted on
04/02/2003 10:24:04 AM PST
by
ladtx
("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
To: NormsRevenge
Give that little terrorist scumbag 20 years.
3
posted on
04/02/2003 10:24:08 AM PST
by
wideawake
(Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: NormsRevenge
Whee!
To: NormsRevenge
Glad to hear it. Thank goodness he didn't use any of his weapons against people or property.
To: NormsRevenge
A man and a woman were spotted and videotaped planting the Molotov cocktail outside an office building. Why hasn't the woman been arrested also?
To: NormsRevenge
Now that he is out of Hallinan's jurisdiction perhaps the charges against him might actually stick.
7
posted on
04/02/2003 10:27:27 AM PST
by
GSWarrior
To: mountaineer
No, he just left it there on the sidewalk in hopes that some over adrenalinized nutcase protester would pick it up, light it and throw it.
Not enough guts to do it himself.
To: Publius6961
"Planting" a molotove cocktail? That sounds kind of weird. It's not like it's self-detonating. I wonder if they had it, and decided against throwing it, or whether they hoped it would be found as sort of an anonymous threat of future problems.
9
posted on
04/02/2003 10:28:45 AM PST
by
XJarhead
To: NormsRevenge
Good! I hope the man gets 20 years & the woman gets 20 also. Hopefully they will arrest her too.
10
posted on
04/02/2003 10:31:19 AM PST
by
Teetop
(democrats....... socialist.........whats the difference?)
To: Roscoe; Catspaw; wimpycat
According to some of our "friends" on the paleocon and paleolib left, this is an intolerable statist intrusion upon this man's absolute Constimatushunal rights to arm himself any way he wants. After all, if its intimidating to anyone else, let them get their own molotov cocktails....
11
posted on
04/02/2003 10:32:11 AM PST
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(Paleocons, the French and the UN - Excusing corrupt power mad dictators for decades)
To: NormsRevenge
Liberals are evil.
To: Chancellor Palpatine
"By any (and they do mean any) means necessary", dontcha know.
13
posted on
04/02/2003 10:39:50 AM PST
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: Chancellor Palpatine
an intolerable statist intrusion upon this man's absolute Constimatushunal rights to arm himself any way he wants. As well as a violation of his Constimatushunal right to set fire to public buildings!
14
posted on
04/02/2003 10:55:24 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Chancellor Palpatine
The ATF is involved, so Mr. Molotov is a hero.
15
posted on
04/02/2003 10:56:34 AM PST
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: NormsRevenge
"That's not my Molotov Cocktail officer, I'm just holding it for a friend."
16
posted on
04/02/2003 10:59:28 AM PST
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(My ear infection sucks bigtime and that's even counting vicodin in the + column. I'm not an animal!)
To: wimpycat
ANARCHY IS FREEDOM!!!
17
posted on
04/02/2003 11:00:54 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: NormsRevenge
Paging Ramsey Clark - Please go to Lost and Found, we have an item that belongs to you.
18
posted on
04/02/2003 11:09:54 AM PST
by
Ben Hecks
(Fry Mumia.....then fry Ramsey Clark)
To: NormsRevenge

Next, they've gotta get these bastards (nice how they're wearing masks, huh?).
To: Roscoe; wimpycat
You can't point to any provision of the Constimatushun which specifically enumerates for the government the power to prohibit the burning of public buildings, you jackboot licking thugs......
20
posted on
04/02/2003 11:13:42 AM PST
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(Paleocons, the French and the UN - Excusing corrupt power mad dictators for decades)
To: XJarhead
These types plant things ahead of time and then get to them as the goings on are going on.
21
posted on
04/02/2003 11:15:38 AM PST
by
IYAS9YAS
(Go Fast, Turn Left!)
To: Politically Correct
No, he just left it there on the sidewalk in hopes that some over adrenalinized nutcase protester would pick it up, light it and throw it. If this is what I think it is, it's not just "a" molotov coctail.
After one of the demonstrations in SF was broken up a while ago, a rucksack full of the things was found hidden under some bushes near an office building. The owner was thought to have brought them for use but choosing to hide them when they had to run.
22
posted on
04/02/2003 11:17:58 AM PST
by
Cachelot
(~ In waters near you ~)
To: NormsRevenge
Federal charges. Good. Take it out of the hands of SFO DA
23
posted on
04/02/2003 11:21:03 AM PST
by
paul51
To: NormsRevenge; *San FRancisco; GodBlessAmerica; SeenTheLight; Cool Guy; CounterCounterCulture; ...
Thanks for posting Norm.
Ping!
To: ladtx
Not a terrorist, a Peace Protestor...
25
posted on
04/02/2003 11:26:59 AM PST
by
trebb
To: martin_fierro
Didn't some whining leftist claim that some conservative made up this sign?
26
posted on
04/02/2003 11:32:05 AM PST
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: IYAS9YAS
But the molotovs were planted on the day of the march but not used. They were just left there. Why plant it days or weeks ahead of the next march?
27
posted on
04/02/2003 11:47:42 AM PST
by
XJarhead
To: American Preservative
My pleasure. Lots of good news here today!
28
posted on
04/02/2003 12:17:10 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... FReepin' to the Oldies .. The US Constitution and Bill of Rights)
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: Noumenon; Carry_Okie; harpseal; Jeff Head
"Jacob Lehman, 25, of San Francisco, was arrested on Saturday without incident. He was originally arraigned on state charges, but those will be withdrawn and he was to be transferred into federal custody pending federal charges, the ATF said." Can anyone elucidate why this is?
31
posted on
04/02/2003 12:33:46 PM PST
by
sauropod
(If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Oh come on! Don't be a twit!
32
posted on
04/02/2003 12:34:45 PM PST
by
sauropod
(If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
To: mvpel
Janeane Garofalo.
33
posted on
04/02/2003 12:36:02 PM PST
by
sauropod
(If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy...)
To: sauropod
Probably because they have a better chance of convicting him under federal law than state law. Or maybe the suspect is involved with an organization that operates in more than one state and might be part of a multi-state investigation.
34
posted on
04/02/2003 12:38:34 PM PST
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: sauropod
It is a federal crime to manufacture, posess or place a "an infernal machine." I will make no comment on the Constitutionality of same but suffice to say it is from the interstate commerce provision.
35
posted on
04/02/2003 1:08:37 PM PST
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
You can't point to any provision of the Constimatushun which specifically enumerates for the government the power to prohibit the burning of public buildings, you jackboot licking thugs...... The Constitution leaves the discretion to draft such laws to the states. Why do you need laws prohibiting arson to be enforced at the federal level?
36
posted on
04/02/2003 1:11:54 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: wimpycat
yeah, they do... but they tend to forget to ask themselves "What is necessary?"
37
posted on
04/02/2003 2:38:43 PM PST
by
demosthenes the elder
(scum will never cease to be scum - why must that be explained to anyone?)
To: martin_fierro
but janeane Garafalo says that photo is a figment of our imagination.
To: onetimeatbandcamp
i'll betcha those guys have incited less violence against officers than the e-mails going around about punching peace protesters till they 'get it' has against peaceniks. And I'll betcha, with just as much empirical evidence as you cite, that you have your head up your band fag ass. So there.
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
To: onetimeatbandcamp
well there haven't been any cases of officers being shot besides the 101st guy, and that had nothing at all to do with these anarchists. I can imagine someone pounding a peacenick, so its a pretty safe bet. Yeah there ya go. I can imagine it's true, so why pursue the facts any further.
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: onetimeatbandcamp
i didn't say it was true. just that it was a good bet. speaking of facts, try reading whats in front of ya. Don't mind if I do. What's in front of me is a news item that a man has been arrested in connection with a Molotov cocktail device found after a San Francisco antiwar protest.
At a similar protest, also in San Francisco, activists raised a banner that read "We Support Our Troops When They Shoot Their Officers." This was displayed on one of the activists' own websites, San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center (SF Indymedia). Weeks afterward, a US soldier tossed a grenade into a tent in Camp Pennsylvania, killing two officers.
Nobody here claimed any link between the banner and the attack (except you). The point here is that activists' stated aim of "peace" doesn't always correspond with their actions.
To: XJarhead
These weapons were found in the bushes by a mentally disabled person, who contacted the shop owner, who called the cops, who sent the bomb squad. They were hidden ahead of a protest that was to go to that area that afternoon. I believe they found fingerprints on the bottoms. There was another stash of things found down the street.
>>>"Planting" a molotove cocktail? That sounds kind of weird. It's not like it's self-detonating. I wonder if they had it, and decided against throwing it, or whether they hoped it would be found as sort of an anonymous threat of future problems.
Comment #45 Removed by Moderator
To: NormsRevenge; Roscoe; cinFLA
To: NormsRevenge
Here in the State of Kalifornia, This guy will get a misdeamor, but then will sue and win for Harrassment from the Poice.
47
posted on
04/02/2003 6:25:58 PM PST
by
Psycho_Runner
(There is no such as a stupid question, only stupid people. (look at the press))
To: NormsRevenge
Hmmmm... Just more fodder for my theory that these "anti-war" protester types really have no objection to war or violence itself per se, but to the particular administrator of it...
48
posted on
04/02/2003 6:30:36 PM PST
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: Cultural Jihad
"He was prescribed marijuana to ease the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder..." A new quack use for pot!
49
posted on
04/02/2003 7:04:27 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: onetimeatbandcamp
apparently NOT using a molotov cocktail will get you arrested. You bet. Manufacture and possession is illegal. At least it used to be, and I dont think it changed.
IIRC, they fall under the category of destructive devices. A lot of things fell into that category in the past - home-made fireworks, for instance.
You can still make, possess, and sell them provided you have a FFL and the proper permits. Thats the way I remember it. And the destructive devices permit used to run around $3000/yr, so I suspect the guy in the article didnt have one.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson