Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pedophiles Seek Online Support, Societal Acceptance
CNSNews.com ^ | 6/13/03 | Steve Brown

Posted on 06/13/2003 8:17:51 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-375 next last
To: Jeff Gordon
Whatever floats your boat. ....so when are you graduating from pre-school?????
51 posted on 06/13/2003 10:48:00 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"I don't suppose you could explain how a full 90% of the sex abuse incidents in the Catholic Church involved men on boys."

No, I can't. I don't think it's particularly relevant, either. I'm not about to blame Catholicism for the sex abuse, nor am I about to blame homosexuality. I blame pedophiles.
52 posted on 06/13/2003 10:52:30 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
These "pro-gay" posters you're referring to (and I'm certainly not aware of any "pro-gay" group; maybe a group that doesn't care about homos, maybe) probably don't show up to discuss a thread about pedophiles because they don't have a reason to. They don't automatically equate homos with pedophilia, as you apparently do.
53 posted on 06/13/2003 10:55:33 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
It never fails. Conservatives warned years ago about normalizing homosexuality, as normalizing something based on a behavior (and a sexual behavior at that), is just plain ignorant. For those who don't get it, think about it.

Yet if society continues to normalize behaviors we will eventually come to a point when pedophiles, based on their behaviour, want the behavior normalized. Well, we've reached that point. So when conservatives point this out, gays and gay proponents miss the point entirely and argue a straw man argument. That being, most homosexuals are not pedophiles.

That's not the argument. Conservatives have always warned that normalizing something based on behavior is wrong. Now that we've reached that point, those who disagree can only argue against a straw man.

54 posted on 06/13/2003 10:56:40 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
Demanding public acceptance of queers is just the first step in de-sensitizing society to all of these other abhorrent, morally depraved and anti-social perversions.

But, it ain't worth getting all het-up over. The fags have won. We're too far over the edge of that slippery slope to change anything now. Enjoy.

;-/

55 posted on 06/13/2003 11:01:03 AM PDT by Gargantua (Embrace clarity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
Well some of us do have reason to discuss pedophiles. Do you have children, grandchildren? Couple of comments regarding you profile...
forcing a woman to carry a child....o'h yes, so terrible...nine months out of your whole life. Maybe if they gave it a try, they'd see how great the experience was. BTW, Women who become pregnant from rape make up a very small percentage and I don't necessarily believe that being raped and becoming pregnant from the horror = automatic abortion.

You're a twinkie in the world.

56 posted on 06/13/2003 11:03:04 AM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jhw61
Then go talk about the pedophiles. This thread should actually BE about pedophiles, but oddly enough, every thread that relates to sex on FreeRepublic ends up with some social conservative screaming how every fault in society is somehow the blame of the queers. And save your analysis of profiles for someone that gives a damn, cause I don't.
57 posted on 06/13/2003 11:11:33 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
"....let's see how many FR posters that defend homosexuals, and dispute any connection to the vile NAMBLA or BUTTERFLY KISSES surface and PROCLAIM THEIR OPPOSITION and REPULSION for pedophiles who seek support and acceptance for their fixation on children."

I defend homosexuals, dispute connection to Nambla or Butterfly Kisses, and proclaim opposition and repulsion for pedophiles who seek acceptance for their fixation on children.

So?

58 posted on 06/13/2003 11:40:20 AM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
"Let's here some oppositon to these child raping animals from the pro gay poster!!!"

When have you ever seen ANY Freeper support pedophilia? For that matter, have you ever heard anyone anywhere support it?

59 posted on 06/13/2003 11:42:43 AM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
LanPBo1 Since Jan 30, 2003

....you might want refrain from making SHORTSIGHTED remarks like this; I'm certainly not aware of any "pro-gay" until your here for a while NEWBIE!

60 posted on 06/13/2003 11:44:08 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jhw61
My husband has already informed me, if anyone ever touches our son.....see ya later honey...i'm off to prison for murder.

I used to think that way, but decided that the last thing my children would need after being molested by some scum would be for their father to go off to jail.

So I've decided that if that ever happens to one of my children, I'll make sure that I have an iron clad alibi when I slaughter the son of a bitch.

61 posted on 06/13/2003 12:01:15 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Excellent advice...I'll pass that on to my husband.
62 posted on 06/13/2003 12:03:13 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Temple Drake
The website notes that "true emancipation" lies "in a child's sublime assent to becoming self actualized with the keen-eyed help of a loving mentor (gardener) who is willing to carefully fertilize and tend to the growth of the emotions, spirit and intellectual flora of the garden of a child's soul."

Translation: We're a bunch of pervert butt pirates who love to molest children and want desparately to make it sound normal. GAG!
63 posted on 06/13/2003 12:04:00 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExpatCanuck
Make sure and call me when it's time.
64 posted on 06/13/2003 12:04:38 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Some MAAs claiming to be Christians say they have found comfort at a website called Philia, which provides news and resources to religious support groups for adults who are attracted to minors. Philia, along with the Christian Boylove Forum (CBLF), are for those who "find themselves in the position of having no one to turn to who shares their faith as well as their sexual feelings.

Sheesh, I guess this was only a matter of time.

65 posted on 06/13/2003 12:06:27 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
...every thread that relates to sex on FreeRepublic ends up with some social conservative screaming how every fault in society is somehow the blame of the queers.

As I see it, conservatives don't blame queers, they blame society for falling for the gay agenda. That is, some folks don't care about being manipulated, desensitized and used while social conservatives refuse to be manipulated, desensitized and used.

The ignored warnings by conservative about the slippery slope of normalizing certain behavior is our beef. You may speak out against pedophiles now, but what about the next generation. How will the next generation view pedophiles? Just how far will society sink? It all starts somewhere, and as I said, that's our beef.

66 posted on 06/13/2003 12:06:38 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
Beastiality will come before pedophilia.
67 posted on 06/13/2003 12:07:40 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
This is just a natural progression that began by legitimatizing the perverted behavior of homosexuals. After the pedophiles have their way I suppose the family pets will have to watch their backsides. I mean, how do you discriminate against an individual who believes a pygmy goat is sexually attractive?

This whole perverted group believes that any natural predilection should be legitimatized. That is a very flawed argument.
68 posted on 06/13/2003 12:10:24 PM PDT by luvtheconstitution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: luvtheconstitution
That's just it. Where do you draw the line of acceptability. What's the next ante.....having a baby and turning them over to the loving souls of the perverts.
69 posted on 06/13/2003 12:17:58 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
....AN OFFENSIVE HYPOCRITE is a waste of MY time and deserves no response!

....and no response will be given to you from me EVER!

70 posted on 06/13/2003 12:31:18 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: luvtheconstitution
I blame bugs Bunny!

In the following cartoons, Bugs appears in some form of ladies garb or does a female-like turn:

Hare-um Scare-um (Hardaway/Dalton, 1939)
Prototypical Bugs dresses up as a female dog to spoof the hunting dog.
Elmer’s Pet Rabbit (Jones, 1941)
Another prototypical Bugs dances with Fudd and addresses him saying, Katherine Hepburn-like, “You dance divinely, really you do.”
The Heckling Hare (Avery, 1941)
Takes the dog’s flowers coquétteishly, saying “For me? Oh, you darling!”
The Wabbit Who Came to Supper (Freleng, 1942)
Appears in womens’ lingerie and screams as Fudd opens door on him.
Bugs Bunny Gets the Boid (Clampett, 1942)
Dances with Beaky Buzzard and asks “Why don’t we do this more often?” Also appears interrupted mid-shower by the bird, and replies coyly “You naughty, naughty boy!”
Super Rabbit (Jones, 1943)
Brief appearance as Little Bo Peep owing to a costume mixup in a phone booth when changing into Super Rabbit.
A Corny Concerto (Clampett, 1943)
Appears as a ballerina, ultimately wrapping his brassiere around the heads of Porky and his hunting dog.
What’s Cookin’ Doc? (Clampett, 1944)
Arises, Carmen Miranda-like, from a mountain of fruits and vegetables which have been hurled at him.
Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips (Freleng, 1944)
Appears as a geisha who mallets a Sumo wrestler.
Hare Ribbin’ (Clampett, 1944)
Appears as a blonde mermaid, driving the Mad Russian dog – well, mad.
Stage Door Cartoon (Freleng, 1945)
One of the can-can dancers Fudd whistles at.
Herr Meets Hare (Freleng, 1945)
Appears as a Wagnerian heroine dancing with Hermann Göering. Same gag used again in What’s Opera, Doc? (Jones, 1957).
Hare Conditioned (Jones, 1945)
Appears as a lady customer who charms the Gildersleeve-like floorwalker, laughing hysterically when Gildersleeve tickles “her” mannequin’s foot.
Mississippi Hare (Jones, 1948)
Appears as a dainty southern belle who is rescued by a big southern beau from the clutches of Colonel Shuffle. When the beau discovers Bugs is a rabbit, he goes into a trance and walks off the boat, prompting Bugs to observe that he almost had a happy ending.
Haredevil Hare (Jones, 1948)
Bugs as coquétte again, romancing K-9, observes that “there’s a beautiful Earth out tonight.”
Hare Splitter (Freleng, 1948)
Bugs impersonates his girlfriend Daisy Lou to abuse a rival, Casbah.
Bowery Bugs (Davis, 1949)
Bugs uses many disguises in this one, one of which is female, in order to heckle Steve Brodie, to the extent that Brodie jumps off the Brooklyn Bridge.
Long Haired Hare (Jones, 1949)
Bugs appears as a bobby-soxer, asking for the autograph of Giovanni Jones with a dynamite pen.
The Windblown Hare (McKimson, 1949)
Bugs appears as Red Riding Hood, singing The Rabbit in Red to the tune of The Lady in Red.
Hillbilly Hare (McKimson, 1950)
Appears as an Ozark cutie who wows the Martin brothers.
Rabbit Fire (Jones, 1951)
Bugs appears as a huntress with Daffy as Gypsy, her hunting dog.
Rabbit Seasoning (Jones, 1952)
Appears as a “stacked” Lana Turner-type, who bamboozles Fudd into shooting her a duck.
Hare Trimmed (Freleng, 1953)
First as Granny, then eloping with Yosemite Sam as a bride. Bugs’ bridal gown gets caught on a nail, revealing his tail. Upon seeing this, Sam goes nuts.
Robot Rabbit (Freleng, 1953)
Appears as a robot cutie – in a potbellied stove, no less.
What’s Opera, Doc? (Jones, 1957)
In perhaps his most famous example of crossdressing, Bugs appears as Brünnhilde and sings the Maltese aria Return My Love, (set to Wagner’s Pilgrim Theme from Tannhäuser) with Elmer Fudd.
Now Hare This (McKimson, 1958)
Appears as Red Riding Hood.
The Unmentionables (Freleng, 1963)
Appears as a flapper who kicks Rocky while doing the Charleston.



71 posted on 06/13/2003 12:34:14 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Why are these sick bastards not being hit with DOS 24/7?
72 posted on 06/13/2003 12:35:22 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
"....AN OFFENSIVE HYPOCRITE is a waste of MY time and deserves no response!"

You went looking for exactly the answer I gave you. Now you have it, and you don't want it. That's crazy.

"and no response will be given to you from me EVER!"

Good for you!! Stick to your weird principles!

73 posted on 06/13/2003 12:41:35 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Fifty years from now, when peophelia is accepted
 as an alternative lifestyle, I wonder what new group
 will be seeking societal acceptance for their perversion?


Well, if pedophilia is acceptable by then, look for
deity-eating religionists to be fighting for equality.
74 posted on 06/13/2003 12:45:34 PM PDT by gcruse (Superstition is a mind in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
....let's see how many FR posters that defend homosexuals, and dispute any connection to the vile NAMBLA or BUTTERFLY KISSES surface and PROCLAIM THEIR OPPOSITION and REPULSION for pedophiles who seek support and acceptance for their fixation on children.

Ask, and you shall receive.

Presenting: Streamline!

75 posted on 06/13/2003 1:04:36 PM PDT by Houmatt (Real conservatives don't defend kiddy porn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
Equating all the homos with pedophilia is just stupid.

Seeing as 'homosexuals do not reproduce, they recruit. And seeing as any exposure to homosexual behavior is child abuse. And seeing as 'homosexuals' are grossly more likely to also be child molesters than non-'homosexuals' are. I think it's stupid to think of a 'homosexual' as anything but a child molester.

We can't risk our children's lives and futures by exposing them to the 'homosexual' recruiters. Since we can't tell which ones will molest from which ones won't molest, we must assume that all 'homosexuals', who have already given in to one perversion, would easily surrender to another perversion if the opportunity presented itself.

76 posted on 06/13/2003 1:09:21 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: John O
"Seeing as 'homosexuals do not reproduce, they recruit."

Faulty premise.

"I think it's stupid to think of a 'homosexual' as anything but a child molester."

You're a reality molester.

77 posted on 06/13/2003 1:11:28 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: luvtheconstitution
This whole perverted group believes that any unnatural predilection should be legitimatized.

Minor correction for accuracy. Neither homosexuality nor child molesting is natural

78 posted on 06/13/2003 1:15:17 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: John O
Bravo!!
79 posted on 06/13/2003 1:18:40 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
Are you sure you spelled your user name corretly?

Qwerty. You meant Queertoo, right.
80 posted on 06/13/2003 1:20:38 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jhw61
"Are you sure you spelled your user name corretly?"

Yes.

"Qwerty. You meant Queertoo, right."

Haha.. is this supposed to be stinging? Try harder.

81 posted on 06/13/2003 1:24:49 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM; kattracks
I said this before, and I will say it again: Right after Rush Limbaugh's second book was released in hardcover, I picked it up. He wrote the next group of people that would make the next "civil rights" push would be the transgendered community. I made a point of telling everyone I knew that was familiar with Rush that I thought he actually was wrong on that one. I said the next in line would be the pedophiles.

Sure enough, ten years later, Rush is wrong, and I am right.

One point for me, I'd guess.

But as God is my witness, I wish I was wrong.

This just sickens me in ways that defy description.

82 posted on 06/13/2003 1:26:31 PM PDT by Houmatt (Remember Jeffrey Curley and Jesse Dirkhising!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jhw61
BTW, Women who become pregnant from rape make up a very small percentage and I don't necessarily believe that being raped and becoming pregnant from the horror = automatic abortion.

More than that, abortions in cases of rape and incest make up only one percent of all abortions performed annually.

83 posted on 06/13/2003 1:30:39 PM PDT by Houmatt (Remember Jeffrey Curley and Jesse Dirkhising!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
"Seeing as 'homosexuals do not reproduce, they recruit."

Faulty premise.

Then why are the 'homosexuals' constantly trying to get access to children? Why is it that most 'homosexuals' had their first experience with a much older person (that is, they were molested).

There is no genetic basis for homnosexual behavior. It is a chosen (albeit subconsciously in most cases) behavior due to mental illness or damage.

84 posted on 06/13/2003 1:32:31 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jhw61; Bubba_Leroy
I would strongly suggest you see the film In The Bedroom if you really want an idea on how to take care of a molester of your children and get away with it.
85 posted on 06/13/2003 1:35:24 PM PDT by Houmatt (Remember Jeffrey Curley and Jesse Dirkhising!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jhw61
The following is for those who cannot seem to comprehend that sexual abuse can directly lead to something that is now culturally celebrated as being diverse.

I don't think that all homosexuals are pedophiles, but a large number of themselves were abused. They just might not recognize it for what it is. For those that weren't abused gender confusion and family relations (esp. fathers) were the contributing factor.

CAUSE

Approximately one in six boys is sexually abused before age 16.

(Conservative estimate of incidents involving physical contact in U.S. and Canada. See below.)

EFFECT

Anger
Fear
Homosexuality Issues
Helplessness
Isolation and Alienation
Legitimacy
Loss
Masculinity Issues
Negative Childhood Peer Relations
Negative Schemas about People
Negative Schemas about the Self
Problems with Sexuality
Self Blame/Guilt
Shame/Humiliation

My source:
http://www.jimhopper.com/male-ab/

MORE EFFECT

Drs. Robert L. Johnson and Diane K. Shrier reported on "a six year experience in an adolescent medicine clinic in which all medical interviews of adolescent males included questions about sexual molestation. Forty adolescent males reported sexual victimization during their preadolescent years. This study group of forty was compared to a randomly selected age-matched group whose responses were negative to the same questions." ["Sexual Victimization of Boys: Experience at an Adolescent Medicine Clinic," Journal of Adolescent Health Care, Vol. 6, No. 5, (1985), p. 372] Those who had been molested "identified themselves as currently homosexual nearly seven times as often and bisexual nearly six times as often" as those who had not been molested. [ibid., p. 374]

Source:
http://members.aol.com/hawebpage2/news/n0898b.html#N0898B

The buzzword homophobia is often blamed for the self-esteem problems in the "homosexual" community. I think sexual abuse is far more likely.
86 posted on 06/13/2003 1:38:53 PM PDT by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: John O
"Then why are the 'homosexuals' constantly trying to get access to children?"

Be more specific... in what ways do you think homosexuals are trying to gain access to children?

"Why is it that most 'homosexuals' had their first experience with a much older person"

You're building the premise into the question. First you need to show that most homosexuals have their first experience with a much older person, then you can argue about whether it means that children are "recruited". My personal experiences lead me to believe that you're wrong.

"There is no genetic basis for homnosexual behavior."

You have no proof of that. Most Freepers who share your opinion will tell you that you can't conclusively claim there is no genetic component.

"It is a chosen (albeit subconsciously in most cases) behavior due to mental illness or damage."

That's your opinion, and it remains unproven.

87 posted on 06/13/2003 1:42:02 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
Bullfeathers, cowboy.

You know as well as I homosexuals cannot reproduce (for obvious reasons) and so they have opted instead to teach their "lifestyle" in public schools to children as young as 5, and you have the audacity to say they do not recruit?

Who is the "reality molester," afthole?

88 posted on 06/13/2003 1:42:31 PM PDT by Houmatt (Remember Jeffrey Curley and Jesse Dirkhising!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
You have no proof of that. Most Freepers who share your opinion will tell you that you can't conclusively claim there is no genetic component.

And I am sure you can show otherwise, right? Then do it. Put up or shut up.

89 posted on 06/13/2003 1:49:40 PM PDT by Houmatt (Remember Jeffrey Curley and Jesse Dirkhising!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
"Bullfeathers, cowboy."

Cowgirl.

"You know as well as I homosexuals cannot reproduce (for obvious reasons)"

First of all, plenty of homosexuals DO reproduce. Ever met someone who used to be married, had kids, and then came out? Happens all the time. Secondly, many lesbians get pregnant deliberately and have kids. So you're wrong right off the bat... which probably isn't all that unusual for you.

Another possibility you aren't considering is that homosexuality could be a recessive trait. Also you've left out the possibility that it is hormonal conditions in the mother while pregnant that lead to homosexuality... and in that case there is no need for homosexuals to "reproduce".

"and so they have opted instead to teach their "lifestyle" in public schools to children as young as 5, and you have the audacity to say they do not recruit?"

Yes. I am telling you that while you may find teaching "diversity" in schools distasteful, it does NOT create homosexuals.

"Who is the "reality molester," afthole?"

Not you. You're just ignorant.

90 posted on 06/13/2003 1:52:00 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: kuma
Thank you for the info. I do speak of some experience concerning homosexuals. My homosexual brother died of AIDS at the age of 44 nine years ago.
91 posted on 06/13/2003 1:52:44 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
"And I am sure you can show otherwise, right? Then do it. Put up or shut up."

Yes. Saying there is "NO GENETIC COMPONENT" means that they fully understand human genetics and there is absolutely no chance of a genetic component, which is a bunk claim. You don't have to take my word for it, just read the threads. I can't prove that there IS a genetic component, but you can't prove that there isn't.

Do your own homework.

There are well thought and researched posts on FR about homosexuality, but none of them have come from you.

92 posted on 06/13/2003 1:55:31 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
....I am checking it out!
93 posted on 06/13/2003 2:06:06 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"a loving mentor (gardener) who is willing to carefully fertilize and tend to the growth of the emotions, spirit and intellectual flora of the garden of a child's soul."

... with his penis. Hm. Well. At least, unlike the "boy lovers," they won't get fertilizer in their spade.

94 posted on 06/13/2003 2:07:08 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
I can't say there is much I agree on with Qwerty about. However, I do think their may be some genetic "predisposition". WHAT??? What do I mean by predispositon? Do I mean a Homosexual Gene? NO!

A predisposition in personality/temperment. Anyone who has ever had children realizes the very first day that their little bundle of joy has a personality. Some are screamers, some whiners and both of mine were whimperers (THANK GOD) and I'm sure there are many other kinds.

Other than that though everything else is LEARNED BEHAVIOR.

Children must be taught their gender.
Children must be taught gender relations (Daddy & Mommy)
Children must be taught their sexuality.
The above two greatly contribute to this.
Children must be taught respect for others sexual privacy.
Everyone knows children live in their own universe ME & MINE & CURIOSITY RULES.

Most of those things must be learned before puberty. Everyone here ought to know how confusing puberty is let alone being unclear about any of the above.

When a sexual predator interferes, even a loving family environment cannot fix ALL the damage done.

Hetero/sexual disorders, including same sex attraction, isn't a "conscious" choice but it is not the product of a completed childhood. Dysfuntional (mild to extreme) families are the largest contributing factor.

If their is a genetic "factor" it is very small indeed and can be outweighed with completing everything a child needs to learn in their upbringing.
95 posted on 06/13/2003 2:09:35 PM PDT by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: All
In my experience, molestation has been by a heterosexual adult of the opposite sex. Usually a relative, family friend, or a fine upstanding member of the community that NO one would suspect...

Granted,
Just my experience as a girl.....
96 posted on 06/13/2003 2:11:21 PM PDT by najida (What handbasket? And where did you say we were going?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; LanPB01
Since you brought up the Catholic Church, I don't suppose you could explain how a full 90% of the sex abuse incidents in the Catholic Church involved men on boys.

Shh.... we weren't supposed to notice that.

97 posted on 06/13/2003 2:13:03 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty; scripter; EdReform; ArGee
First of all, plenty of homosexuals DO reproduce. Ever met someone who used to be married, had kids, and then came out? Happens all the time. Secondly, many lesbians get pregnant deliberately and have kids. So you're wrong right off the bat... which probably isn't all that unusual for you.

But can they reproduce other homosexuals? No, which is what I am talking about, but you knew that.

Yes. I am telling you that while you may find teaching "diversity" in schools distasteful, it does NOT create homosexuals.

BA-LONEY! I have seen and heard about some of the stuff that is being given and shown to schoolkids like Heather Has Two Mommies, Gloria Goes To Gay Pride and It's Elementary, not to mention Fistgate.

So you can hand that BS to somebody else.

98 posted on 06/13/2003 2:13:33 PM PDT by Houmatt (Remember Jeffrey Curley and Jesse Dirkhising!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The website notes that "true emancipation" lies "in a child's sublime assent to becoming self actualized with the keen-eyed help of a loving mentor (gardener) who is willing to carefully fertilize and tend to the growth of the emotions, spirit and intellectual flora of the garden of a child's soul."

This would make me gag even if children weren't involved.

99 posted on 06/13/2003 2:16:35 PM PDT by murdoog (i just changed my tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhw61
Then go talk about the pedophiles. This thread should actually BE about pedophiles, but oddly enough, every thread that relates to sex on FreeRepublic ends up with some social conservative screaming how every fault in society is somehow the blame of the queers.

Interesting, isn't it? Men who are fascinated with 15 year old boys aren't gay, see? What? Gay? What does this have to do with homosexuality? No, no, no.... you aren't gay till the boy is 16, see? If he's 14 or 15, you're just a pedophile. No relation to gays at all. I mean, really, gays? Who brought up gays? Why gays? What does this have to do with gays? Ha. God these people are full of crap.

100 posted on 06/13/2003 2:17:18 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson