Nudist selling nude kid videos ( Nude Kid Camps )

St Petersburg Times ^

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

LAND O'LAKES - The former president of the nudist group that sponsored a controversial summer camp for teenagers runs a business that sells videos featuring young nude girls.

Land O'Lakes resident Walt Zadanoff served as president of the American Sunbathing Association, the former name of the 50,000-member American Association for Nude Recreation based in Kissimmee.

The 68-year-old nudist defends the sale of the videos, which include full-frontal shots of elementary-school-age girls at beauty pageants in Europe, as "information and entertainment for a legitimate nudist."

"I sell it in good faith as a genuine nudist product," Zadanoff said Thursday of tapes he distributes over the Internet through a company called Sun-Dressed Marketing.

U.S. Rep. Mark Foley, who campaigned last month against a nude summer camp in Pasco County, considers the videos fodder for a less savory element.

The West Palm Beach Republican is running for the U.S. Senate seat held by Bob Graham and has specialized in child protection issues in the U.S. House.

"These videos are nothing more than a fix for pedophiles," Foley said in a written statement e-mailed to the St. Petersburg Times. "They serve young children on a platter for America's most depraved."

Foley said a local nudist faxed him information about Zadanoff's Web site. Last month, Foley criticized a camp for naked children aged 11 to 17 held at Pasco's Lake Como nudist resort. It was sponsored by the nudist organization Zadanoff led from 1990-92.

The American Association for Nude Recreation disavows the video sales. After inquiries from the Times, the nudist group asked Zadanoff Thursday to remove a link from his Web site to its site.

American nudist resorts don't hold beauty pageants for nude children, association marketing official Debra Peterson said.

"We saw the Web site and said, "Whoa!"' Peterson said. "While the video content may be fine, the focus on the child element to sell it was not appropriate."

Zadanoff said he sells one or two pageant videos a week and that they represent a handful of his 100 video titles. He makes most of his money from guides to international nudist resorts, he said.

Supplied by producers in Russia, the Czech Republic and France, the videos are categorized as "teen" "junior teen" and "junior miss."

Generally, the younger the girls, the more expensive the video. One 55-minute junior miss tape sells for $99.95. The sales caption reads: "Judging based on beauty, personality, poise and grace. Resolution rating - GREAT."

But the sales don't appear to break the law, which delineates between non-sexual nudity and lewdness, said Pasco-Pinellas State Attorney Bernie McCabe. Not that he approves of Zadanoff's Web site.

"There's no question it's probably getting into the hands of folks who aren't just enamored of being a naturist," McCabe said. "So is it feeding some other desire that we find not appropriate?"

Zadanoff accused Foley of being a publicity-hungry "laughing stock" whose mind is "in the gutter." Zadanoff said the videos include no posing, genital closeups or sex.

Zadanoff said he's concerned there could be pedophiles among his customers, but said it's not anything he can control.

"We can't read what's in people's minds," he said. "If they want to take the Sears Roebuck catalog and turn it into something erotic, we can't control that."

Foley's office said his goal is more to shame Zadanoff than to punish him. Resurrecting the summer camp issue, the congressman said the videos prove the need for watchfulness on the part of nudist parents.

"When a company like Sears markets to potential buyers, it doesn't charge nearly $100 for its catalog. And it doesn't limit its catalog so most don't even see it," Foley said. "These excuses hold as much water as a slotted spoon."

[ClearCase_guy]

"We saw the Web site and said, "Whoa!"' Peterson said. "While the video content may be fine, the focus on the child element to sell it was not appropriate."

So, the product (film of naked children) is perfectly fine? But the sales campaign is the problem?

Hell in a handbasket bump

[TSgt]

"Zadanoff said he's concerned there could be pedophiles among his customers..."

Ya think?

[Welsh Rabbit]

Generally, the younger the girls, the more expensive the video. One 55-minute junior miss tape sells for $99.95.

"I sell it in good faith as a genuine nudist product," Zadanoff said

Sure you do.... Then why the huge mark-up if you claim you're not doing it to profit from perverts who will pay big bucks to see naked children?

[Welsh Rabbit]

Generally, the younger the girls, the more expensive the video. One 55-minute junior miss tape sells for $99.95.

"I sell it in good faith as a genuine nudist product," Zadanoff said

Sure you do.... Then why the huge mark-up if you claim you're not doing it to profit from perverts who will pay big bucks to see naked children?

[Darksheare]

We spotted this one coming!
A few of us, myself included, asked how many of the camp counselors were actually predators.

[Mo1]

The 68-year-old nudist defends the sale of the videos, which include full-frontal shots of elementary-school-age girls at beauty pageants in Europe, as "information and entertainment for a legitimate nudist."

He's a pervert

[johnb838]

There is something wrong with these nudist people in general. Every one of them I see on the tube make my skin crawl as they protest how wholesome it is and nothing to do with sex. I don't believe that for one minute. And I think any child that has been put in that environment should be checked for signs of abuse. I've been saying this for a long time.

[netmilsmom]

Time for Netmilsdad and myself to watch the girls a little more closely.
Funny how we can't have pictures of the kids in the bathtub developed at Walmart without the Feds visiting but these sickos can sell nude baby beauty queen videos and it's perfectly ok.

To quote mhking, "Just damn."

[mhking]

!!!???!!!???

Just damn.

If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

[Reagan Disciple]

Ever notice that when you do see a clip of a nudist camp on TV it's always full of people who should be wearing clothes 24/7.

[Darksheare]

Drawing from a live model has no 'arousal' to it, but that's different.
You're drawing, and trying to make a perfect image, not crawling in titilation.

These guys are walking around with it all hanging out, and there's no purpose for it but titilation. The only purpose I could see for nudism is the 'no tan line' angle, but once you're done baking yourself to death you should get your clothes back on!
*Slaps forehead*
I agree with you, and am having a hard time trying to fit it into what I have practical experince of.
And nudism has no correlation in anything I know.

[dighton]

(Gov. Jeb) Bush calls for inquiry into nude kid videos

[johnb838]

The drawing of a model is a good example. You could get aroused, particularly if the person is the right gender for you and attractive, but you don't. You are there to draw.

Likewise I have gone to skinny-dipping places and "hung out" as it were, and nobody makes it a big deal, and some are more attractive than others, but nobody walks around sporting wood or anything.

I just don't trust these people because they seem to protest too much, they look creepy, and there are children involved. I suspect that this organization would not have to be scratched too hard to find a nest of pedophiles.

[Darksheare]

Exactly.

These guys have a certain creepiness about them that is undefinable.
It's a different mindset, and with these guys it's probably an evil mindset.

I wonder how many people are going to understand the drawing example and why it's contrary to nudism?

[meyer]

Next week's headline:

"Nudist Faces Jail Time"

[grapeape]

10 busks say's anyone can find this stuff on Kazaa or any other file sharing program. I have seen enough child porn there to make anyone sick.

[Publius6961]

So, the product (film of naked children) is perfectly fine? But the sales campaign is the problem?

Actually the biggest problem is giving an otherwise obscure site publicity.

Incidentally, any post that begins with "So..." is invariably putting words in someone's mouth and not worth further reading.

[ClearCase_guy]

Dude! I quoted the article:

Peterson said. "While the video content may be fine, ..."

Then I said:

So, the product (film of naked children) is perfectly fine?

You're having a problem with the fact that in put "perfectly" in my post? This is putting words in someone's mouth?