Posted on 12/13/2010 4:37:17 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
To lefty’s and anti-Christians it probably is upsetting, conservatives and Christians love it.
What people can’t stand is that scum ball Mitt Romney, they won’t vote for the guy.
As a devout Catholic, Jindal may have problems winning the Mormon vote since the Catholic church is adamant that Mormons are not Christians, and that they are a polytheistic non-Christian religion created by a Smith guy in the 1800s.
Condi Rice should never have anything to do with any conservative, she and that entire rino crowd needs to just fade away from the political scene forever.
What about social issues?
Romney is the other front runner.
If the number was significant, it might mean the end of the republican party (to be replaced by something else). It has happened before... but it is not a likely outcome. That said, I’m a conservative before I’m a republican.
NEITHER.
Are you KIDDING? If I had a gun to my head, I’d take the bullet rather than cast a vote for that phony schmuckabee.
What true conservative candidate wouldn't be? And she knows how.
What about social issues, you ask? The American people recognized the most pressing and alarming problems of America and had their say in the November elections. Fiscal reforms and responsibilities will have to come first.
After that, the American people will also let their desires be known as to social issues that come in a close second. What will be different(hopefully) is that Congress and the President will be more open to what the American people really think and want as opposed to the Socialist/Marxist agenda that the Democrats and Obama have tried to push down our throats for the past two years. They have known that they were going against the majority principle and desires as was demonstrated by their underhanded and secretive way of gaining ground on their agendas.
America is awake and, hopefully, will stay that way. Pressing social issues will be worked out in the same way that fiscal matters will be in the near future; by the mandates of the American people, not for the enrichment and power of politicians. A wise President and a wise Congress will recognize that fact. Today’s developements are encouraging that such facts are being recognized by Congress and Obama as well.
Social conservatives just won the 2010 election cycle. Conservatives even knocked off social liberal, Republican incumbents.
Conservatives will only support conservatives, not social liberals like Christie and Daniels that are liberal on some issues, and conservative on others.
ansel12
Conservatives will only support conservatives, not social liberals like Christie and Daniels that are liberal on some issues, and conservative on others.
____________________________________________________________
I suppose I would concede to that statement ansel12. However, Conservatives know they can never have a perfect world. If that were true, John McCain would now be homeward bound.
Christie will be useful because of the toughness he has demonstrated in matters of finance. A Conservative majority can place its players where they are most talented and reign in their more undesirable leanings. A majority doesn’t always mean complete consensus. That would be wonderful but it’s a little unrealistic to hope that will happen.
Christie is too liberal for the presidency, and really has no place in the 2012 race discussion, at least among conservatives.
McCain was the choice of you moderates before, except for those of you that preferred Mitt Romney, just think, you have a chance for Romney again.
Governor Palin is the desired choice for Republicans and conservatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.