Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not a fan: Krauthammer calls Palin 'rather weak' and gives her 'no chance of winning' in 2012
The Daily Caller ^ | December 31, 2010 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 12/31/2010 2:46:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Is the idea that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin could be America’s next president laughable? Not only to many on the left, but also to conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer.

On Friday’s broadcast of “Inside Washington,” Krauthammer offered several reasons why Palin shouldn’t be considered the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2012 presidential election.

“What do you mean if not Sarah Palin in 2012?” Krauthammer said. “Who’s saying she’s going to be the presidential candidate? I don’t even hear her saying it. Her chances of being are smaller than half a dozen other people. If you talk to Republicans, I don’t think there are what, more than one in three who would tell you she has a chance of winning the presidency or even the nomination.”

Because of that, he said, she wasn’t the favorite.

“And she is not the favorite,” he continued. “She has a very strong core constituency but outside of that I think she is rather weak.”

Krauthammer has previously downplayed Palin’s chances and indicated he favors Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels. He said Palin would not be the ideal candidate to unseat a “vulnerable” President Barack Obama.

“Her negatives are over 50 percent,” Krauthammer said. “She has no chance of winning a general election. Why would you want a candidate who is going to lose against a Democrat who is going to be vulnerable and who is also extremely ideologically ambitious?”

He even employed a Keith Olbermann catch phrase to describe Palin and said even fellow Republicans didn’t see Palin as qualified.

“A half-term governor? I’m not sure Republicans think of her as qualified.” Krauthammer said.

Watch:

(VIDEO AT LINK)


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; Polls; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2012; carterspeechwriter; democrats; dncspeechwriter; elitist; fakeshrink; freepressforpalin; gopbackstabber; gopsaboteur; jourbalists; krauthammer; krauthammer4dnc; krauthammer4dsmiv; krauthammer4fraud; krauthammer4obama; krauthammer4romney; misogynist; misogynist4romney; mondale; mondalespeechwriter; obama; palin; phoneyshrink; rinos; romney4romney; sociopathcentral
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350351-365 next last
To: Recovering Ex-hippie

>>”Why would anyone use Wikipedia as a source...anyone can put anything on there...and there is no verification.”<<

Okay, here are some other sources that say the same thing:

His WaPo Bio:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/opinions/krauthammer.htm

His speakers bureau bio:
http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/celebritytalentbios/Charles-Krauthammer

http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/Krauthammer_Charles

http://www.s9.com/Biography/Krauthammer-Charles

http://www.deardemocrat.com/node/592

Good enough for you?


251 posted on 12/31/2010 7:25:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
the media already crucified Sarah Palin during the 2008 election...NO ONE was ever treated as she was...and she came back and kicked A$$ and she is NOT afraid of Charles Kraut nor the media...she knows what she is doing and she will make a great LEADER...

we working, tax paying Americans will come out in FORCE to support...watch us ROAR in 2012....we have just begun...

Herman Cain, great public speaker, smart business man...there are millions of them out there just like him...he is not a house hold name, SARAH PALIN IS....she is a Powerhouse to be reckoned with....

HAPPY NEW YEAR FREEPERS...GOD BLESS AMERICAN

252 posted on 12/31/2010 7:25:46 PM PST by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Odd way of expressing your “support”. Just saying.”

Fine, “just say” it to someone else. Support doesn’t equal unquestioning devotion (well, maybe to you). I’ll vote, I won’t worship...and I won’t call those who support someone else the “enemy”.


253 posted on 12/31/2010 7:25:55 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: raygunfan

I’m not your stepandfetchit. Do your own research. Mitch Daniels, the Governor of Indiana, personally straightened out the budget through a brilliant revamping of the state’s budget process that left conservative economists amazed and impressed. He is a deeply capable individual who himself generates ideas and solutions, in the tradition of true leadership, not someone who merely regurgitates on TV that day’s coaching from her briefers.

We cannot afford to have a lightweight as our standard bearer. Sarah Palin got touched by the fickle finger of fate in 2008 and rose to prominence. Nothing that she’s done since then indicates that she truly has the capacity to lead the nation.


254 posted on 12/31/2010 7:29:15 PM PST by beckett (Amor Fati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

Well, actually I don’t know what TLC is, but assume it’s some sort of a television channel or the other. We live in a remote area and live a sort of primitive life; cutting and splitting our own wood, gardening, stuff like that. We only have a computer because I’ve had to use the word processor to produce correspondence, statements, inventories and other stuff in our business. - My eyes are getting problems, so any time invested in reading anybody’s books has to be very little and very slow. I’m sure Herman Cain is impressive, but right now, who knows where this 2012 election is going. One thing I know, if the RNC keeps pushing RINO’s, they might as well hang it up. Maybe he (Cain) would thrash Sarah Palin in a debate, maybe not. Without a teleprompter, Obama is like Ned in the Third Reader, that much I can safely say. - Palin has performed quite well without a teleprompter when her teleprompter was messed with as a prank at some university or the other. - I sort of doubt she runs; will more likely campaign for a good conservative candidate if one runs.


255 posted on 12/31/2010 7:29:33 PM PST by Twinkie (Awake and strengthen that which remains . . . . . . . . Revelation 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

You are seriously misrepresenting every point made in this thread.

The only fanaticism this poster sees on FR these days - is posters like you - frenetically bashing Palin.

More and more, you people, sound exactly like what liberals say.

Just saying. It’s like Saul Alinsky could have written another book. Called;

“Rules for RINOS”.


256 posted on 12/31/2010 7:29:49 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
My concern is her grasp of the issues and her tendency to resort to sloganeering. If she's going to win in the primary, she's going to have to get better there. She'll be sharing a stage with the likes Gingrich, Romney, possibly John Bolton, possibly Mike Pence, possibly Herman Cain, possibly Jeb Bush -- all of whom are going to be very formidable debaters.

Perhaps you've missed some her live spots on Fox News. Sarah is fast on her feet, and has an exceptional command of the issues.

Yes, she's done her share of sloganeering, but the incidence of that is small in comparison to her extemporaneous, in-depth elaboration on subjects of all sorts. Unfortunately, those don't play well in 15 second sound bites on television, and don't serve the MSM's agenda at all.

Maybe you recall the Palin - Biden debate from the 2008 primary. If you watched carefully, you could see that Sarah was literally chomping at the bit to break free and really debate Biden. She appeared to me like someone who was being tightly restrained, and I'm sure she was. If she had been allowed to speak her mind, I think she would have embarrassed old Joe.

I think what voters will take away from a debate with Palin vs Cain, Huck, Romney, Newt, et al, is a sense that this woman doesn't just know the issues - she understands and embodies the basic spirit of Americanism better than any of the others.

What Palin has, is correct instincts. She automatically seems to default to the most pro-American position, no matter the topic. In other words, she doesn't have to spin up the processors in her brain to come up with the best possible answer. She simply speaks straight from her core values, which just happen to be fundamentally, originalist American.

Naturally, that resonates deeply with American voters who are terrified at the direction our country is going, and it transcends all issue-based policy positions.

For me, this is the primary reason I strongly support her for president. Issues will come and go, but without a firm moral compass, and a rock-solid American orientation, no amount of familiarity with major policy will guarantee that our president will make the correct choices for the nation. Sarah's got the correct orientation for our country.

257 posted on 12/31/2010 7:36:41 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Pox

“There are very few here, if any, that would be properly designated a “Moonie” or “Manson-Like” with their following of Mrs. Palin, IMO.”

Some are doing a darn good imitation of one.

“I tend to think of it more as “Chivalry”. The spirited defense makes a lot more sense when you look at it from that perspective (as far as male posters go, which seems to be where the bulk of defenders lie).”

Well, that does make sense. What doesn’t make sense is that (drum roll) she’s NOT their girlfriend (or mother, sister, or daughter). She’s a POLITICIAN...attractive, right on the key issues, and charismatic...but she’s still a politician.


258 posted on 12/31/2010 7:38:21 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

So what’s the problem?

How about you suggest someone you think is more qualified?

All you’re doing, is whining.


259 posted on 12/31/2010 7:39:53 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“The only fanaticism this poster sees on FR these days - is posters like you - frenetically bashing Palin.”

You’re an idiot. Only the most drooling adorer could take anything I have said as “frenetically bashing Palin”. I financially supported Angle, O’Donnell, Wilson, and physically and financially supported Hayworth. RINO my ass...it’s idiots like you who give Palin supporters a bad name. To reiterate - you’re an idiot.


260 posted on 12/31/2010 7:44:05 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

Gosh.

That’s contributing to the discussion.


261 posted on 12/31/2010 7:44:38 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: beckett

in other words it is easier for you to criticize palin with vague attacks on her abilities than it is to produce evidence of her executive abilities.

there are tons of threads on fr showing the outstanding governing abilities of palin, and what she accomplished....and yet you back mitch daniels, with more vague accolades from non-cited sources of how great he is/was..

that doesnt cut it, palin’s accomplishments are easily available all over the net, you come on and insist she has shortcomings and produce no evidence to back it up...


262 posted on 12/31/2010 7:49:21 PM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: beckett

in other words it is easier for you to criticize palin with vague attacks on her abilities than it is to produce evidence of hershortcomings in her executive abilities.

there are tons of threads on fr showing the outstanding governing abilities of palin, and what she accomplished....and yet you back mitch daniels, with more vague accolades from non-cited sources of how great he is/was..

that doesnt cut it, palin’s accomplishments are easily available all over the net, you come on and insist she has shortcomings and produce no evidence to back it up...


263 posted on 12/31/2010 7:51:08 PM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“How about you suggest someone you think is more qualified?”

How about you pay better attention? My involvement in this thread had to do with a pinhead calling someone the “enemy” because they had the temerity to question whether or not Palin was electable. Are we to assume that such a question is taboo on “Free” Republic? Palin may be the best we can field in the upcoming election and if she is I will vote for her, but I will NOT worship at the feet of that “Dear Leader” or any other “Dear Leader”. And the pathetic, over-wrought use of “RINO” to discribe anyone who doesn’t worship the way you do is assuming its place as a meaningless epithet, right up there with “racist”.


264 posted on 12/31/2010 7:51:21 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
“Negatives? What would those be, pray tell?”

You’re hopeless.

More like you've been caught with no ammo. I challenge you to tell me what Palin's alleged negatives are, and the best you can do is insult me?

Well, I guess we can now throw out every comment you've made on this thread, thus far.

265 posted on 12/31/2010 7:51:38 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

Did you happen to mention in that rant, someone you think is more qualified?


266 posted on 12/31/2010 7:52:31 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“The only fanaticism this poster sees on FR these days - is posters like you - frenetically bashing Palin.”

Gosh, and that brilliantly misinformed comment did?


267 posted on 12/31/2010 7:52:43 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

Dude.

You already responded to that comment.

Are you repeating yourself, to avoid mentioning someone you believe is more qualified?

Focus. Try. You can do it!

“Qualified”... :)


268 posted on 12/31/2010 7:55:28 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
I was raised to defend a woman's honor whether or not she happened to be my girlfriend, relative or wife. I tend to think there are a lot of “old fashioned” gentlemen on this forum who were also raised in that manner.

I could be mistaken, but I hope not. :)

269 posted on 12/31/2010 7:55:28 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: beckett
We cannot afford to have a lightweight as our standard bearer.

Mitch "Truce on Social Issues" Daniels is a conservative feather weight.

270 posted on 12/31/2010 7:55:47 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Did you happen to mention in that rant, someone you think is more qualified?”

How about you read that “rant” again, slowly this time? There may BE no one more qualified that we can field; my issue was with the poster who attacked someone for questioning her electabilty. But then, you’d know that IF YOU READ THE FREAKING THING THE FIRST TIME.


271 posted on 12/31/2010 7:56:57 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

Some of you folks have said that Palin will be elected President in the greatest margin in history and that she will reform our country to its fullest.

This sounds like the type of colossal Messianic BS that only the Left is capable of proposing.

OK. Let’s see this happen.


272 posted on 12/31/2010 7:57:12 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

OK fine.

So basically, you’ve been whining about what (another) poster said to you.

Thanks for clarifying. Now can you please stop whining.


273 posted on 12/31/2010 7:58:27 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

“colossal Messianic BS”

-

Is that like “cult”?...

Just asking.


274 posted on 12/31/2010 8:00:14 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Pox

“I was raised to defend a woman’s honor whether or not she happened to be my girlfriend, relative or wife. I tend to think there are a lot of “old fashioned” gentlemen on this forum who were also raised in that manner.
I could be mistaken, but I hope not. :)”

How noble of you. Get to work on Hillary.


275 posted on 12/31/2010 8:02:21 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
Ahh, but only those who deserve such a defense. I was also taught how to distinguish between good and evil. :)
276 posted on 12/31/2010 8:04:43 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Now can you please stop whining.”

No one invited you into the conversation I was having with windflier. Crawl back in your hole.


277 posted on 12/31/2010 8:04:58 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

Dude.

Have you even mentioned someone you think is more qualified than Palin?

Or are you a “concern troll”?


278 posted on 12/31/2010 8:06:08 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Pox

“Ahh, but only those who deserve such a defense. I was also taught how to distinguish between good and evil. :)”

I see...the chivalry of convenience ;-)


279 posted on 12/31/2010 8:06:20 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

“This sounds like the type of colossal Messianic BS that only the Left is capable of proposing.”

Get ready - they’ll attack you as a RINO, then wet themselves.


280 posted on 12/31/2010 8:08:03 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers; Cringing Negativism Network
My involvement in this thread had to do with a pinhead calling someone the “enemy” because they had the temerity to question whether or not Palin was electable.

That "pinhead" would be me, mister. And, if you're going to tell the story of how this all started, then tell it right.

I took a poster to task for pushing the infamous "quitter" meme. That IS an enemy line, as has long been established on this forum by the countless analyses of hundreds of well-informed, thinking Freepers. And, in the interests of accuracy, I never called that poster an "enemy".

You failed to successfully refute my assertion that the "quitter" meme is indeed an enemy line, and instead, resorted to calling me names after I and others patiently explained it to you.

Get it straight, or leave it alone.

281 posted on 12/31/2010 8:08:48 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
Pfft, more like the Chivalry of Common Sense! :)
282 posted on 12/31/2010 8:10:31 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Have you even mentioned someone you think is more qualified than Palin?”

From 271: ‘There may BE no one more qualified that we can field; my issue was with the poster who attacked someone for questioning her electabilty.’

Sorry, I see that reading is not your strong suit, “dude”.


283 posted on 12/31/2010 8:13:42 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

I repeat then.

What’s the problem?

If you don’t think someone else is more qualified, then why are you whining so?


284 posted on 12/31/2010 8:15:03 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Funny how the Hunterites and Paulestinians make up the bulk of the Palinoia Posse. Or does Myth Romney or Gomer Huckleberry strike your fancy?


285 posted on 12/31/2010 8:18:25 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Folks here who see Palin as a great POTUS in waiting are falling for a cult of personality. The fact is she's not a great candidate nor does she look like much of a president. I really dislike her quitting as governor in AK. Don't care the "why" so much because the "quitter" label will resonate and stick. Politically, perception is reality.

Obama needs to be replaced with someone calm, capable and an experienced executive. I don't know who that is but I know it's not Palin or Huckabee. None of the names floated thrill me.

It's going to be an uphill battle either way. The natural tendency is to reelection a president. Over and above that, I can't help but think voters will be inclined to give Obama a "second chance" out of racial guilt.

286 posted on 12/31/2010 8:29:36 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

There’s that “cult” word again.

Were supporters of conservative Ronald Reagan a “cult”?...

“Government is not the solution to the problem. Government is the problem”.

Is that the sort of thing, one hears in a cult?


287 posted on 12/31/2010 8:32:05 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

The “natural tendency” is reelection during the worst economy since at least the 1930’s? With the complete takeover of the auto industry, the health care business, energy, public schools, the Internet and so much more? Really?


288 posted on 12/31/2010 8:38:25 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sorry. I don’t represent Hunter or Paul or Romney or Huckabee. None of those folks thrill me.

But Saint Sarah does nothing for me either.


289 posted on 12/31/2010 8:41:13 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Yeah mister, I know you’re the pinhead...and no one “pushed” the “quitter meme” (and no one invited Cringing Negativism Network to use it as an oppotunity to spout his Sarah-worship). The poster said that it can and will be used against her, and it will. You may whistle past the graveyard on that one but anyone concerned about her success would be well advised not to. To mention it does not make anyone an “enemy” or “pushing the enemy line”. I would want any candidate I support to focus hard on their vulnerabilities and to be prepared to refute (in fact, they do it in debate prep all the time). Her supporters should be just as prepared for rational conversations that occur on 1:1 basis with potential supporters, not just try to shame someone into submission by calling them a RINO for not accepting her asendancy at face value.

“Get it straight or leave it alone”.

Get over yourself.


290 posted on 12/31/2010 8:42:52 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“I repeat then.”

Do you ever. No more time wasted on you.


291 posted on 12/31/2010 8:46:15 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers

Were you planning to ever get around to posting something about Guv Palin’s qualifications vs other potential candidates, or are you only posting again and again about your “feelings”.

Sheesh.

Me me me.


292 posted on 12/31/2010 8:46:29 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

In normal times maybe Palin should wait several years and a couple more election cycles. But I think the country needs her now. and I think there is a reason God brought her onto the national stage. destiny, fate, whatever


293 posted on 12/31/2010 8:50:27 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Palin or 3rd party... no exceptions !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

the guy supports abortion. nuff said...


294 posted on 12/31/2010 8:52:55 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Palin or 3rd party... no exceptions !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
no one “pushed” the “quitter meme”...

You're either a liar or a fool. I told you to "get it straight or leave it alone", but you apparently refuse to do either. Here's the post you claim never happened, and which started all this tonight:

Friday, December 31, 2010 5:17:12 PM · 40 of 293

Windflier to rbg81

Face it—if she gets nominated in ‘12, they will harp on the Quitter aspect. And frankly, its justified. She quit when things got tough and chose to be a professional celebrity. . AWas it fair? No, but life ain’t fair.

Sure they will. And will that persuade you to vote for Obama? No?

Use your head. Those who can be swayed by the MSM's knocks on Sarah Palin weren't ever going to vote for her anyway. Sarah's supporters already know the truth of the events surrounding her resignation, and understand that she outfoxed those who were trying to destroy her.

You're pushing the enemy line, here. I hope you know that.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies

_______________________________________________________

As for the balance of your post, there are far too many inconsistencies for me to waste my time revealing.

The fact is, you're not really listening to anyone here. You're reacting like some hysterical, overwrought liberal, assuming that you're under attack, when that actually isn't the case. Track back to the beginning of this exchange, and it's apparent that you've become upset every time anyone has challenged you, or disagreed with anything you've said.

People on this thread have attempted to reason with you, and have encouraged you to get better data to straighten out your misconceptions, but your response to every one has been uniformly snarling and nasty.

No one here is out to get you. What you're not comprehending is that most of us talking to you have been through the debates you're trying to have, a long time ago, and are in possession of much that you apparently are not.

Try not to take it so personally.

Have a good new year.

295 posted on 12/31/2010 9:08:23 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“You’re either a liar or a fool.
“Try not to take it so personally.”

Interesting perspective.

“Have a good new year.”

You too.


296 posted on 12/31/2010 9:15:09 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Pox

OK, you win. She had a child with special needs instead of an abortion. (Why does this make her anything more than all the other moms who have done the same thing?) She is now qualified and will most certainly be a giant in American history. Next to Jefferson and Franklin. She is just going to come to DC and bear hug everyone into lock step agreement with with her.

If she had stayed as Governor and just went back to business in ALASKA, the MSM would have forgotten all about her. She could have stayed serious and came back in a few years and been a real player. Instead she went for the money and the glory. And she is only going to get one of those. Guess which one. (12 million last year)
Happy New Years!


297 posted on 12/31/2010 10:20:30 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Folks here who see Palin as a great POTUS in waiting are falling for a cult of personality.

I believe your opinion is mistaken. I see it more from a point of view that given all available alternatives to her at this point in time, she comes out head and shoulders above any other "choice" that has presented itself.

No candidate is "perfect", and all have "flaws" and "negatives", not to mention "issues" that the left (the media) will hammer away at mercilessly.

Given that situation, her "negatives" are no worse than any other potential candidate, and in fact her position is much more favorable on that front than perhaps one or two other possible candidates. Name another candidate who is leaning towards running and we can predict exactly how the MSM will rip into that candidate for their "shortcomings".

All in all, she leads the pack as far as a conservative candidate that actually has a chance to win in 2012. You may not like the field that is available, but it is what it is, and so far she is the best we have to work with. Until a better candidate comes along, I see no point in talking down about a person whose values reflect those that post on this board more than just about any other you can name.
298 posted on 12/31/2010 10:33:19 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
OK, you win. She had a child with special needs instead of an abortion. (Why does this make her anything more than all the other moms who have done the same thing?) She is now qualified and will most certainly be a giant in American history. Next to Jefferson and Franklin. She is just going to come to DC and bear hug everyone into lock step agreement with with her.

The fear and loathing for Mrs. Palin is just oozing from you. All that hate is unhealthy and you don't seem to be perched on an even keel, IMO.

If she had stayed as Governor and just went back to business in ALASKA, the MSM would have forgotten all about her. She could have stayed serious and came back in a few years and been a real player. Instead she went for the money and the glory. And she is only going to get one of those. Guess which one. (12 million last year)

Either you're being purposely disingenuous, or hopelessly ignorant, and my money is on the former.

You still didn't answer my question. If Mitt Romney was the Republican Nominee in 2012, would you vote for him, vote for Obama, write in another name, or refuse to vote?

At this point, I think the answer is obvious, but I'd really like to hear your response.
299 posted on 12/31/2010 10:38:11 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Krauthammer doesn’t have a clue what lies west of the Hudson River.


300 posted on 12/31/2010 10:41:00 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350351-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson