Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reason Ron Paul will not run third party in 2012: Rand 2016
Milwaukee Story ^ | 1.25.11 | Andy Booker

Posted on 01/25/2012 8:20:08 AM PST by packback

A third party run by Ron Paul in 2012 would make the presidential campaign path much more difficult for Rand in 2016, a year when the field will be much stronger than this cycle.

I think the 2016 cycle is likely to bring out the candidates that the Republican Party was swooning over just months ago, namely Palin, Paul Ryan and Chris Christie.

(Excerpt) Read more at milwaukeestory.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: gop; randpaul; ronpaul; thirdparty
I can think of nothing worse than a third party run by Ron Paul for this party I'm glad that it looks like Rand is the reason he will not do it. Rand is much more reasonable than his father on issues like not letting Iran get a bomb. Rand has even said he would unilaterally strike Iran for humanitarian reasons. Good for him for standing up to his father.
1 posted on 01/25/2012 8:20:16 AM PST by packback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: packback
I don't know if the Repub Party is swooning after Christie's unfavorable comments about Newt.
2 posted on 01/25/2012 8:25:49 AM PST by duckman (Go Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

Forget Palin and Christie, it’s Rubio I want to see in 2016. Paul Ryan and Rand Paul can fight for the VP slot.


3 posted on 01/25/2012 8:26:07 AM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

I admit to knowing next to nothing about Rand Paul. I think he’s a Tea Party favorite.

But... his old man is bonkers. And the nut don’t fall far from the tree.


4 posted on 01/25/2012 8:26:17 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

In 2016 Gingrich will win a second term in a Reagan-like landslide. So we are really talking about 2020 here as far as GOP candidates go.


5 posted on 01/25/2012 8:26:26 AM PST by InterceptPoint (TIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

The author of this story assumes that Ron alterPaul is a rational, reasoned and thinking man.


6 posted on 01/25/2012 8:26:26 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

No way to Chris Christie who is Romney II !

Besides, in 2016 our nominee will be incumbent President Newt Gingrich!


7 posted on 01/25/2012 8:27:38 AM PST by KansasGirl (GO NEWT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

I could really get behind Rand in 2016 if the party of stuipid messes up in 2012 and we get four more years of zero.


8 posted on 01/25/2012 8:28:53 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

There are many many reasons he wouldn’t even attempt it, not the least of which it would negate years of his efforts to get the republican party to be the party of less federal government.


9 posted on 01/25/2012 8:29:59 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

I recall Mark Levin saying if RP goes third party, he would do everything in his power to block Rand’s reelection bid.


10 posted on 01/25/2012 8:31:31 AM PST by Track9 (The revolution IS brewing..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

Charlie ‘I’m a RINO or maybe a Democrat’ Crust would never get nominated by Conservatives.


11 posted on 01/25/2012 8:36:29 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

If Rand shares his father’s foreign policy views, he would be better off running for the Democratic nomination. Ron Paul would take more votes from Obama than he would from the GOP candidate.


12 posted on 01/25/2012 8:39:28 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

I will wholeheartedly support Sen. Rand Paul for president. Wish he was running this time.


13 posted on 01/25/2012 8:40:45 AM PST by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

RP was asked whether he would run as a third party candidate in the most recent debate. He more or less said no, and added that he’s “not an absolutist”. Some FReepers interpreted this to mean that he could change his mind. I interpreted it to mean that he is willing to work within the existing institutions (which he did in 2008 and so far this year).

Anyway, Gary Johnson is the most likely candidate of the Libertarian Party.


14 posted on 01/25/2012 8:43:20 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Track9

To Levin, this is all just a game, apparently.


15 posted on 01/25/2012 8:43:30 AM PST by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: packback

Rand ought to wait until he has served a full term in the Senate. And he ought to consider getting some executive experience, say as a Kentucky governor...I’m just sayin’.


16 posted on 01/25/2012 8:44:25 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckman

I must have missed what Christie said about Newt. What did he say? I think Christie will be the Mitt of the next cycle but way more annoying...haha


17 posted on 01/25/2012 8:53:56 AM PST by packback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

His threat was his effort, among a whole list of other things, to prevent RP’s third party run. Why do you say it’s just a game for Levin? Meaning what evidence are you basing your opinion on.


18 posted on 01/25/2012 8:55:05 AM PST by Track9 (The revolution IS brewing..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

I don’t get Levin, sometimes he is great and sometimes he is unreasonable.


19 posted on 01/25/2012 8:56:02 AM PST by packback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

“Anyway, Gary Johnson is the most likely candidate of the Libertarian Party.”

Capital ‘L’ reason.com Libertarians are way too secular for Ron Paul.


20 posted on 01/25/2012 8:57:11 AM PST by ari-freedom (If SOPA/PIPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Correct! President Gingrich in 2016 - FOUR MORE YEARS!


21 posted on 01/25/2012 8:59:13 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: packback

“I think Newt Gingrich has embarrassed the party over time,” Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” this morning. “Whether he’ll do again in the future, I don’t know. But Gov. Romney never has.”

If you do a search in FR on Christie you can get the whole story from several posts.


22 posted on 01/25/2012 9:08:27 AM PST by duckman (Go Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: packback

Yep, Rand’s potential has often been sited as at least one reason his father won’t go 3rd party.


23 posted on 01/25/2012 9:20:40 AM PST by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckman

Having some fat guy who can’t make it up one flight of stairs without stopping two or three times and is going to both knees replaced in a few short years is embarrassing.


24 posted on 01/25/2012 9:40:26 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Bet on a 3rd Party—the Democratic Party will insist upon it—the only question is whom they will fund to lead the thing—I do not think Ron Paul will do it—he’s an American and will see though the DNC plan to re-elect Obama. It might well be a Libertarian of some sort. Its 100% possible if Mittens gets the nod—Maybe 65% possible if Newt gets it. BUT it will happen.


25 posted on 01/25/2012 9:59:22 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Track9

To state that he would work to unseat the most conservative Senator, just to get back at his father, speaks loudly that to Levin, this is, at least at some level, a mere game.


26 posted on 01/25/2012 10:02:43 AM PST by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Bet on a 3rd Party—the Democratic Party will insist upon it—the only question is whom they will fund to lead the thing—I do not think Ron Paul will do it—he’s an American and will see though the DNC plan to re-elect Obama. It might well be a Libertarian of some sort. Its 100% possible if Mittens gets the nod—Maybe 65% possible if Newt gets it. BUT it will happen.

Former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson has already declared his intent to seek the nomination of the libertarian party and run for the Presidency....i.e. he is already declared as running 3rd party.

27 posted on 01/25/2012 10:13:58 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Yes, I could agree with that. I understood it as leverage deftly applied. If that’s a game, so be it. I don’t think it implies ML is anti Rand. On the contrary, I think it’s appealing to his Tea Party convictions which would preclude his father going third party. So I don’t agree with the dismissive sentiment toward Levin. Any way, that’s my take.


28 posted on 01/25/2012 10:20:52 AM PST by Track9 (The revolution IS brewing..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
I do not think Ron Paul will do it—he’s an American and will see though the DNC plan to re-elect Obama. It might well be a Libertarian of some sort. Its 100% possible if Mittens gets the nod—Maybe 65% possible if Newt gets it. BUT it will happen.

We can only hope an anti-American dem like Cut and Run goes third party. He will take all the ultra liberal anti-American votes that Obama would normally get. From the voters who think Obama is too conservative.
29 posted on 01/26/2012 3:10:07 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson