Skip to comments.The Dems May Have Miscalculated on Ms. Fluke
Posted on 03/10/2012 8:29:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The Democrats thought they had a great distraction from the economic issues that bedevil most Americans in the form of 30-year-old activist Sandra Fluke. Rush Limbaugh foolishly (as he later acknowledged) called her a slut and a prostitute in the course of ridiculing, entirely properly, her very silly claim that the federal government should force all employers to pay for their female employees contraceptionI never did figure out whether the plan extended to buying male employees condoms and vasectomiesregardless of whether either the employers or employees prefer such benefits to cash compensation. Ms. Flukes theory, really, was so stupid as to be a ripe target for ridicule.
The Democrats went crazy in the aftermath of Rushs error, posturing themselves as the upholders of civility. Barack Obama got into the act, calling Ms. Fluke to congratulate her on her demand for free goods and services, and to ask how her delicate psyche was a holding up. Obama later explained that he did it for his daughters, Sasha and Malia, whom he would never want to hear coarse language.
Well. There was a basic problem with the Democrats strategy; namely, that pretty much everyone knows that when a Democrat talks about a Republican woman, slut or prostitute would be considered a compliment. So it was no surprise when conservatives pointed out that Bill Maher, who contributed $1 million to Obamas re-election campaign, has called Sarah Palin a c*** and a dumb t***, along with other, sometimes worse, epithets. When asked about Mahers disgusting attacks, Presidents Obamas press secretary explained that Obama is not a speech policeman. So evidently Sasha and Malia will have to hear some crude talk after allfrom Democrats, anyway.
Of course, Bill Maher is just one of many. Democrats, in general, are cruder and more vitriolic than Republicans. So it didnt take more than 24 hours or so for Greta van Susteren to point out that someone named Louis C.K.it is highly unlikely that you have heard of himwas scheduled to host the 68th Annual Radio & Television Congressional Correspondents Dinner on June 8. Those correspondents, of course, are some of the very people who had been excoriating Limbaugh for calling Ms. Fluke a slut. CNNs Jay McMichael headed the committee that was in charge of the program:
Were very excited about having Louis C.K. at the dinner, said Jay McMichael of CNN, who chairs the RTCAs executive committee. This is an evening youll want to experience. Were shaking things up, showcasing the unexpected, and delivering lots of laughs.
Lots of laughs, indeed: Mr. C.K., it turns out, is foul-mouthed even for a Democrat. Ms. van Susteren collected some of his comments about Sarah Palin. Feel free to skip ahead if you have a weak stomach or are easily offended:
Louis C.K. says of Palin: her f*** retard making c*** and the baby that just came out of her f**** disgusting c***.
To Palin: just stick your t** in its mouth and shut up.
And here is more: her f***** retard making c****.
Need more to convince you? Here is what he says on twitter:
I want to rub my fathers c*** all over Sarah Palins fat t***
By the way, there is more, lots more.
That, however, is plenty. Even for a liberal, Mr. C.K. is disgusting.
So tonight Glenn Reynolds reported that the Congressional Correspondents (Democrats all, no doubt) have decided to forgo the pleasure of hearing Sarah Palins c*** and t*** ridiculed, along with her young sonhow funny is that!and have discreetly canceled Mr. C.K.s appearance.
This civility thing could be tough on the Democrats. What are they going to do for entertainment?
It hurts my eyes even with the words blocked out...
This woman was claiming to be spending $3000 a year on birth control if I read the thing properly. I don’t really see how that’s possible myself.
I think part of the reason for why the liberals weren’t as successful is two reasons.
1. Conservaatives are for more ready to fight liberals, and be as dirty as liberals to do it.
2. The liberal agenda is unquestionably unmasked and people don’t like it. It’s harder to garner support when you hate what it is you are supporting.
President Obama called patriotic men, women, and children “tea baggers” (a term used by homosexuals to describe a “bag” on chin activity).
There is no civility from the angry red diaper doper baby in the White House.
No...it is over 3 years....but still a lie
Attention Media: Walmart and Target Have Been Offering $9 Birth Control Since 2007
$3000 in 3 years.
$1000 a year.
If her college raised tuition $500 a semester, she’d cough it up without crying before Congress begging them to make taxypayers pay for it.
30 year old still in College. She was real busy. /S
SNL just opened their show with a take on Rush Limbaugh calling Ms. Schmuck a slut. Then he went through a list of new sponsors which were supposedly not good sponsors and it was not funny at all. I am sure Hulu will have it up on their website by tomorrow.
It really does appear that Rush making this an issue is hurting the Rats more than it hurt him. We have found out that the slut is a full out Commie activist, put heat on Obummer for taking Maher’s donation after his Pius speech on decorum, has leftist water carriers like Kristen Powers turning against the Regime over this and this so called “comics comic” CK looking like a dirtbag and having to back out from performing for these dopes. All and all, this could be thought to be some well orchestrated plan by Rush it is turning out so well.
Typical dumb Fluke ...could have got a month's supply of pills from Walmart for about $9.00
And Dave Letterman talked about Palin’s “slutty stewardess outfit” - now there’s somebody ripe for a sponsor boycott a la Limbaugh.....
They really didn’t want Rush to attack this so soon. It will not be a player for the court or the election. Miss Fluck has been vetted. Give Rush credit for knocking this pelosi-dunn crap to the curb.
What better place to get laid?
Rush figured it out at five times a day seven days a week fifty two weeks a year.
I watched it. It was funny. Keep in mind that SNL deals with absurdity as well.
Rush does it again. If he would not have called Fluck a “slut,” what should have been a minor story turned into an attack to get Rush that backfired and shown the “light of truth” on the Democrats and their foul mouth friends. When are they going to learn you DON’T mess with Rush Limbaugh?
Letterman Attacks Palin’s Daughter: She Was Knocked Up By A-Rod
Willow was 15 at the time, btw...
Those are extraordinarily disgusting comments about Sarah. He’s lucky Todd is so far away.
wait, CK had to back out? ... so Obama can’t have his kids join him for that enttertaining romp and expose them to THIS:
Louis C.K. says of Palin: her f*** retard making c*** and the baby that just came out of her f**** disgusting c***.
Oh. How Special!
It hurts my heart.
Conservatives should be accurate. She never claimed she was spending that much. She said that’s what it would cost, not that she personally spent that much.
Not to mention Letterman's "joke" about her underage daughter, which even outraged leftists, so Letterman HAD to apologize on the air.
Mail-order condoms cost about $1 each. Birth control pills cost about $9 per month, and injections about $20 per month.
You can do the math, but the answer is that during the time she was a student at Georgetown, she didn't spend much time in class.
SNL? You mean Saturday Night Live??
Whoa... I can’t believe that thing is still on TV.
The Republicans ought to flip this issue back on the Dems. Come out in favor of free sterilization. That ought to drive them stark raving mad.
“What better place to get laid.”
Law school to be exact.
Which leads one to wonder if this
30 yr old woman is cozy with some
of her male law profs:
Wife: “Honey, there’s a Georgetown
law school student on TV testifying
on behalf of women’s reproductive
rights! Is she in your student? You
must be proud!”
Husband: “Baaa baaa ah ah. She a a ah
she doesn’t look familiar. I’m not sure...”
Had Rush NOT done what he did, the dems would have won with this.
Thank you, Rush. Again.
Agree with you, but the democrats mistake was doing this too far from the election....they are desperate with their little kangaroo court show....and the freepers that got pissed at Rush for apologizing and putting an end to this charade, all you fair weather friends, your not needed by Rush. blabber on. He got rid of some lefty sponsers that freepers were giving money to and got one that we can all use....light bulbs......GG
TOP TEN REASONS WHY FLUKE’S BIRTH CONTROL IS SO EXPENSIVE.
10. Gold plated condoms
09. Paying for Bill Clinton’s vasectomy.
08. Needed to replace her convertible’s shock absorbers.
07. John Edwards was in town...I’m just sayin.
06. Smoked $50 Cuban cigars after sex.
05. EPA issued a new tax on “toxic fluids cleanup”
04. She had a habit of to tipping the abortion doctor.
03. Hired a P/R firm to promote her body as a “womb with a view”.
02. Had to payoff Michelle Obama to make sure that oral sex didn’t fall under the “food police”.
01. It’s that dang Obamacare. He said the rates wouldn’t go up but as usual the prez is a lying SOB.
The dems started a fake battle thinking they were on offense when what they REALLY were was OFFENSIVE. RUSH gave a war...and everybody came. Then he sat back and watched them burn their playhouse down. Strategery. Rush is still the master.
WHO is catching all the hell now? little billy maher and oscambot. Fluke has been widely exposed for the fraud she is. pelosi looks like the nit-twit SHE is. The dems look petty and obscene. dem women look like...well, dem women. (And that ain’t pretty.) anita dunn has been exposed. And even gloria the red has crawled back out from under her rock.
Everyone now knows this was a dem planned fake setup with very little substance to it except the shrill faux outrage of it.
Rush’s leftist advertisers are losing their customers and their stocks are dipping.
I’d say Rush won the war. Big time. It was a calculated risk on his part, but calculated it was. Deliberate. And step by step, inch by inch, he beat their collective a$$.
Eventually, he will step up and explain it for those who still don’t get it.
The problem with Rush is he tells the truth, and liberals can't handle the truth. Show them a mirror and they scream in rage.
Now, don’t hold back, tell us what you really think....I like what your saying......:O)
The contraception attack did the damage it needed to to keep the candidate in the race that Obama really wants to face... Mitt Romney. This attack was squarely aimed at Rick Santorum to draw him out and eviscerate him.
I would recommend that everyone slip a condom into an envelope and mail it to the Dean of the Georgetown University Law School. Insert with the condom a note that requests its being forwarded to Ms Fluke and the “Finance Fluke’s *ucking Fund (4-F).”
I am sure they would be glad to assist in the cause.
$3,000 for three years.
But it would be possible to spend only about $26 per year, even if she were on her back six days a week =
This controversy with Fluke may be a game changer.
fluke also coauthored an article saying that sex change operations should be payed for by tax payers as well.
Now I think we all agree that sex change operations should indeed be paid for by tax payers. However the problem I see arising is what if after a few months that person decides he or she doesn’t like their new sex and wants to change back.
Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year.
They should do it based on odd and even years, just like the Carter years of Gas Rationing.
Even years, innies to outties. Odd years, outties to innies.
That would make her a lunatic, not a whore...
Why are we still calling them Democrats, they are Communists, Marxist and Socialist.
Let's assume it is true for a minute. Here are the implications of her statement:
(1) She doesn't know how to avail herself of all the 'free' services already out there that provide birth control at no or low cost;
(2) Fluke was really nothing more than a female activist hell bent on changing a Catholic Institution's policy, which she KNEW was in place BEFORE she chose to attend Georgetown;
(3) Fluke certainly "gets around";
(4) If I were some guy that "slept" with her while she was paying $3,000 for birth control, I'd be worried about my man-parts falling off about now. Really, how many guys did she sleep with anyway paying for all that birth control?!
Personally, I do not need free birth control, however I do require free contact lenses. Let me briefly make my case.
Ms Fluke may venture into a bar and having imbibed a bit too much, she could then engage in unsafe sex and thus find herself punished with a baby. This would clearly be the government's fault and the only way to avoid this outcome would be to provide Ms Fluke with the free birth control of her choosing.
How does this translate to my need for contact lenses? Let me explain.
My husband of 16 years has had a vas and I do not need free birth control. However, I could venture into the same before mentioned bar. I could also imbibe a bit too much. I could even lose my Dolce and Gabbana prescription glasses and accidentally mistake a complete stranger for my own dear husband, have unprotected sex with him, and thus find myself also punished with a baby.
Clearly, the government should therefore also provide me with free corrective contact lenses. I prefer the daily disposables.
I could also use a free gym membership and a private trainer.