Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Dems May Have Miscalculated on Ms. Fluke
Powerline ^ | March 9, 2012 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 03/10/2012 8:29:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

The Democrats thought they had a great distraction from the economic issues that bedevil most Americans in the form of 30-year-old activist Sandra Fluke. Rush Limbaugh foolishly (as he later acknowledged) called her a “slut” and a “prostitute” in the course of ridiculing, entirely properly, her very silly claim that the federal government should force all employers to pay for their female employees’ contraception–I never did figure out whether the plan extended to buying male employees condoms and vasectomies–regardless of whether either the employers or employees prefer such benefits to cash compensation. Ms. Fluke’s theory, really, was so stupid as to be a ripe target for ridicule.

The Democrats went crazy in the aftermath of Rush’s error, posturing themselves as the upholders of civility. Barack Obama got into the act, calling Ms. Fluke to congratulate her on her demand for free goods and services, and to ask how her delicate psyche was a holding up. Obama later explained that he did it for his daughters, Sasha and Malia, whom he would never want to hear coarse language.

Well. There was a basic problem with the Democrats’ strategy; namely, that pretty much everyone knows that when a Democrat talks about a Republican woman, “slut” or “prostitute” would be considered a compliment. So it was no surprise when conservatives pointed out that Bill Maher, who contributed $1 million to Obama’s re-election campaign, has called Sarah Palin a “c***” and a “dumb t***,” along with other, sometimes worse, epithets. When asked about Maher’s disgusting attacks, President’s Obama’s press secretary explained that Obama is not a speech policeman. So evidently Sasha and Malia will have to hear some crude talk after all–from Democrats, anyway.

Of course, Bill Maher is just one of many. Democrats, in general, are cruder and more vitriolic than Republicans. So it didn’t take more than 24 hours or so for Greta van Susteren to point out that someone named Louis C.K.–it is highly unlikely that you have heard of him–was scheduled to host the 68th Annual Radio & Television Congressional Correspondents Dinner on June 8. Those correspondents, of course, are some of the very people who had been excoriating Limbaugh for calling Ms. Fluke a “slut.” CNN’s Jay McMichael headed the committee that was in charge of the program:

“We’re very excited about having Louis C.K. at the dinner,” said Jay McMichael of CNN, who chairs the RTCA’s executive committee. “This is an evening you’ll want to experience. We’re shaking things up, showcasing the unexpected, and delivering lots of laughs.”

Lots of laughs, indeed: Mr. C.K., it turns out, is foul-mouthed even for a Democrat. Ms. van Susteren collected some of his comments about Sarah Palin. Feel free to skip ahead if you have a weak stomach or are easily offended:

Louis C.K. says of Palin: “her f*** retard making c***” and “the baby that just came out of her f**** disgusting c***.”

To Palin: just “stick your t** in its mouth and shut up.”

And here is more: ”…her f***** retard making c****”.

Need more to convince you? Here is what he says on twitter:

“I want to rub my father’s c*** all over Sarah Palin’s fat t***”

By the way, there is more, lots more.

That, however, is plenty. Even for a liberal, Mr. C.K. is disgusting.

So tonight Glenn Reynolds reported that the Congressional Correspondents (Democrats all, no doubt) have decided to forgo the pleasure of hearing Sarah Palin’s c*** and t*** ridiculed, along with her young son–how funny is that!–and have discreetly canceled Mr. C.K.’s appearance.

This civility thing could be tough on the Democrats. What are they going to do for entertainment?


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: 20120608; billmaher; correspondentsdinner; democrats; freerepublic; limbaugh; palin; rush; rushlimbaugh; sandrafluke; sluts; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-64 last
To: garjog
She wasn't the only one to discover this! "Invasion of the Bee Girls"
51 posted on 03/11/2012 5:31:05 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Casie

Can you toss in hair plugs for me while we are at it?


52 posted on 03/11/2012 5:37:27 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

fluke also coauthored an article saying that sex change operations should be payed for by tax payers as well.
http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance-transcript
Now I think we all agree that sex change operations should indeed be paid for by tax payers. However the problem I see arising is what if after a few months that person decides he or she doesn’t like their new sex and wants to change back.
Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year.

Reply from kickass
>”Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year”<
They should do it based on odd and even years, just like the Carter years of Gas Rationing.
Even years, innies to outties. Odd years, outties to innies.
Dear Kickass,
You know I’m here trying to be helpful and all I get are a bunch of smart-ass remarks.


53 posted on 03/11/2012 5:43:55 AM PDT by not romney (innies to outies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“She never claimed she was spending that much.”

She said “we students have faced financial, emotional, and medical burdens as a result”. We means ‘we’, not ‘they’.

She said, “Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.”

That certainly implies that she has experienced that cost.

She said, “We can only answer that we expected women to be treated equally, to not have our school create untenable burdens that impede our academic success. We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of cura personalis, to care for the whole person, by meeting all of our medical needs. We expected that when we told our universities of the problems this policy created for students, they would help us.”

Again, we means we. It means she feels her school “create[s] untenable burdens that impede our academic success.”

Any fair reading of her testimony would be either that she is exaggerating her involvement as much as she is exaggerating the costs, or that she was saying that she had also shared in these burdens imposed by her school...


54 posted on 03/11/2012 5:52:25 AM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

3000 over 3 years.


55 posted on 03/11/2012 5:59:19 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
She said that’s what it would cost, not that she personally spent that much.

If I remember correctly, Rush never actually called her a slut, he said someone could call her one.

-----

Conservatives should be accurate.

So should liberals, but we all know they won't, and I for one, am tired of getting the short end of the political stick because conservatives don't seem to understand they're fighting an enemy that has no moral standard.

Which, IMHO, was pretty much the point Rush was trying to make with his unapologetic 'apology'.

:-)

56 posted on 03/11/2012 6:27:08 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
“Finance Fluke’s *ucking Fund (4-F).”

ROFLMAO!

You SO owe me a keyboard!

57 posted on 03/11/2012 6:29:49 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Shame on any fellow Catholics who voted for Barack Hussein Obama. Is there anything more evil than murdering a baby who survived an abortion?
58 posted on 03/11/2012 9:13:31 AM PDT by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

WTFl - what the Flucke (pronounced Fluck)

Obama really Fluked up this time

Elvis - Yay, yay, I’m all fluked up


59 posted on 03/11/2012 9:20:43 AM PDT by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

It’s a little different. When a prostitute takes money from a complete stranger for sex, the man also participates in the sex. Sandra Fluke is demanding money from complete strangers for sex, but the people paying are not participating in the sex. In other words, hookers are more honest than liberal activists.


60 posted on 03/11/2012 11:16:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Fluke Charade
Why should we have to fund a middle-aged schoolgirl’s sex life? By Mark Steyn

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/293094/fluke-charade-mark-steyn


61 posted on 03/11/2012 11:20:14 AM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Conservatives are for more ready to fight liberals, and be as dirty as liberals to do it

I wish this was as true with Republican Party leaders as it is with the base.

62 posted on 03/11/2012 11:22:54 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I know Obama’s media surrogates called members of the tea party teabaggers, but I wasn’t aware he used the term itself. Are you certain?


63 posted on 03/11/2012 11:33:28 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: not romney
I appreciate your hard work. I'm with you all the way.

Just trying to keep everybody currently living in Obamaville smiling. There is hope outside the wire.

64 posted on 03/11/2012 3:24:54 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson