Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Battle To Takeover The GOP Begins Today
conservativehq.com ^ | 11/7/12 | By Richard A. Viguerie

Posted on 11/08/2012 11:34:11 AM PST by Kevmo

The Battle To Takeover The GOP Begins Today

By Richard A. Viguerie | 11/7/12

Despite our efforts and the efforts of millions of other conservatives, who went all-in for the Romney candidacy, Election Day 2012 was a disaster – Barack Obama was re-elected President, Republicans lost seats in the House and failed to gain a majority in the Senate.

However, out of that disaster comes some good news: conservatives are saying “Never again” are we going to nominate a big government establishment Republican for President.

What’s more, we won’t have to – conservatives now have a deep bench of potential presidential candidates.

We have elected a new generation of conservative leaders who are capable of taking over the GOP to become the Party of small government constitutional conservatism.

Last night’s election of small government constitutional conservatives -- Ted Cruz, Jeff Flake and Deb Fisher to the Senate, the election of conservative Mike Pence as Governor of Indiana, the election of Trey Radel and other “boat rockers” to the House -- portend that yesterday’s defeats will spell the end of big government Republicanism.

They join such small government constitutional conservative leaders as Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Senators Jim DeMint, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Marco Rubio and Pat Toomey, Virginia’s Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and the 50-odd Members of the House, such as Justin Amash, who stood for conservative principles and voted against the debt ceiling deal.

Establishment Republicans ever anxious to hold on to power, and the establishment media, are going to blame “the Tea Party” and “radical” conservatives who voted for principled small government constitutional conservative candidates in Republican primaries for the election disaster of 2012.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Governor Romney won the nomination by spending tens of millions of dollars knee-capping his conservative opponents in the primaries and then handed the election to Obama because he and his campaign team spent most of the campaign mired in the establishment Republican folly of trying to win by standing for nothing.

The “stand for nothing” strategy didn’t work for President Ford’s 1976 campaign, it didn’t work for President George H.W. Bush’s re-election and it certainly didn’t work for Bob Dole and John McCain.

Republicans never, ever, win the presidency unless they nationalize the election by campaigning on a conservative agenda.

While Obama and the Democrats threw down the gauntlet on the social issues -- such as same-sex marriage and abortion -- Republicans ran away from such issues as same-sex marriage, religious freedom and Obama’s war on the Catholic Church. You couldn’t find any mention of the Constitution or the conservative social agenda in a Romney ad or in a Rove-run Super PAC ad or an ad run by the national GOP.

The establishment Republicans who held the reins and the checkbooks chose to run negative ads against Obama and campaign almost solely on Romney’s biography and economic policies, while skipping the social issues and the concerns of Tea Partiers and small government constitutional conservatives.

In choosing to ignore the larger conservative agenda, Romney chose not to follow the path that led Republicans to win seven of the previous eleven presidential elections.

In the Senate, two good and decent men – Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock – were defeated not because they were pro-life, but because they were inept campaigners.

Tommy Thompson, George Allen, Connie Mack and other establishment-backed candidates -- who ran as establishment Republicans -- all went down to defeat in the general election after being boosted past principled small government conservatives in the primaries by Mitch McConnell and the Washington GOP establishment.

The leaders who forced those kinds of candidates on us -- and manipulated the GOP rules to force the Party to change from a grassroots-driven Party to a Party driven from the top-down by Washington insiders -- should resign.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, Speaker of the House John Boehner, NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions and other Republican leaders behind the epic election failure of 2012 should be replaced with leaders more in tune with the grassroots of the conservative base of the Party.

Likewise, in any logical universe, establishment Republican consultants such as Karl Rove, Ed Gillespie, Romney campaign senior advisor Stewart Stevens and pollster Neil Newhouse would never be hired to run or consult on a national campaign again -- and no one would give a dime to their ineffective Super PACs, such as American Crossroads.

Mitt Romney's loss was the death rattle of the establishment GOP. Far from signaling a rejection of the Tea Party or grassroots conservatives, the disaster of 2012 signals the beginning of the battle to takeover the Republican Party and the opportunity to establish the GOP as the Party of small government constitutional conservatism.


TOPICS: Issues
KEYWORDS: gopcivilwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2012 11:34:17 AM PST by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Four years too late.


2 posted on 11/08/2012 11:40:37 AM PST by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Governor Romney won the nomination by spending tens of millions of dollars knee-capping his conservative opponents in the primaries and then handed the election to Obama because he and his campaign team spent most of the campaign mired in the establishment Republican folly of trying to win by standing for nothing.

Bullseye!


3 posted on 11/08/2012 11:41:17 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

In the words of Ron Paul today “Everyone wanted a bailout” and they voted for the candidate that will give it to them.
We have reached the point of no-return, a plurality of Americans now expects the government to bail them out when they can’t take care of themselves.


4 posted on 11/08/2012 11:43:12 AM PST by SuperGater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

All of those names listed there will be some posters who come around explaining why they are unacceptable and not really conservative. And a good many of them I haven’t looked at myself to even know the truth...and sometimes what you think might be the truth (John Roberts for example)...turns out NOT to be the truth.

I’ve already read diatribes about Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal. Is there ANYONE on that list that most people agree on? Just curious, not really pushing a side. As I am not as informed on them as I guess I need to be.


5 posted on 11/08/2012 11:43:12 AM PST by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Romney lost with a perfectly conservative platform because conservatives stayed home, and they can dream all the dreams they like, the nation may never recover.


6 posted on 11/08/2012 11:43:48 AM PST by Andrei Bulba (No Obama, no way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Good luck with it. I’ve given my last penny to the Republicans or any party for that matter until I see something I can respect and admire. I’m sick of the lesser of two evils.

The GOP is dead to me.


7 posted on 11/08/2012 11:44:46 AM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Richard, just stop.

Stop thinking that you are going to ‘root out’ and otherwise de-corrupt the GOP.

The GOP is at management and infrastructure levels, from office elected and behind the scenes, filled with liberals masquerading as moderate-conservatives. Any effort to delouse the party would require removing everyone from janitor to presidential nominee.

SO WHY WASTE CASH/TIME/POLITICAL CAPITAL?!?!?

Start fresh. Stop saying it can’t be done. With 50 million thoroughly pissed off right wingers out here in lala land, you damn well have the base to do it.

So stop lying to yourself, get together with verifyably - EX - GOP people, ensure mightily against infiltration by GOP hacks and as MJ/Nike once said, Just DO It.


8 posted on 11/08/2012 11:45:05 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Actually the battle has been on going, East Country Club elites against Rural hard working Conservatives.
The Tea Party movement is simply that same battle with a name.


9 posted on 11/08/2012 11:49:32 AM PST by pwatson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Governor Romney won the nomination by spending tens of millions of dollars knee-capping his conservative opponents in the primaries

Romney received plenty of help knee-capping his conservative opponents right here on Free Republic.

Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn...should be replaced with leaders more in tune with the grassroots of the conservative base of the Party.

Cornyn is toast if he decides to run for re-election in 2014, and he knows it!!
10 posted on 11/08/2012 11:49:52 AM PST by TexanByBirth (Free Republic: where they may agree with the message, but they love to shoot the messenger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba

Romney lost with a perfectly conservative platform
***but a perfectly unconservative record. If we’re gonna put up the guy who can stand on a platform, we might as well put up someone who believes it.


11 posted on 11/08/2012 12:02:33 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crimson Elephant
” Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal”, the last two are ineligible. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. I want an AMERICAN president next time. No foreign loyalties.

I like everything I've ever heard Rand say, yet I haven't heard enough.

12 posted on 11/08/2012 12:04:09 PM PST by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

We need a new major party and let the moderates be the third party. If Cain or another similar leader makes a move, I’ll follow and so will my check book. I have given my last $ to people who don’t represnent what is important to me and my family.


13 posted on 11/08/2012 12:04:35 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Speaker of the House elections are coming in a few weeks. We need to try and get Boehner thrown out on his ear!!!1


14 posted on 11/08/2012 12:06:22 PM PST by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I don’t want it.


15 posted on 11/08/2012 12:06:52 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanByBirth

“Governor Romney won the nomination by spending tens of millions of dollars knee-capping his conservative opponents in the primaries

Romney received plenty of help knee-capping his conservative opponents right here on Free Republic.”

Sadly — this is very true. And he got a lot of help from other so-called conservative primary candidates. Case in point — the way Michele Bachmann viciously attacked Gov Perry while never laying a glove on Romney was inexcusable.


16 posted on 11/08/2012 12:10:05 PM PST by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I am tired of hearing this mantra every four years.
The GOP is not going to change and Conservatives are not going to take it over.
After having a conversation with a friend today is it time to replace the Electoral College with direct election of the President?
It is certainly worth thinking about with states like California and New York that are consistently Blue at least then your vote would really have weight.


17 posted on 11/08/2012 12:14:49 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97
We need to try and get Boehner thrown out on his ear!!!

We need to grab him by his ear and throw him out on his azz!

18 posted on 11/08/2012 12:15:32 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97

Absolutely. Boehner has to go. He is just gonna get rolled over and over again.


19 posted on 11/08/2012 12:17:30 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
It will not mater because just like in 2008 and 2012 a number of Conservatives will run in the Primary splitting the Conservative vote allowing the Moderate to float to the top.

The Conservatives in the Republican party need to have their own primary to put forth 1 Conservative to challenge the Republican moderates - let them split their vote.

20 posted on 11/08/2012 12:19:56 PM PST by PeteB570 ( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

McConnel is up for re-election in 2014. He needs to be primaried and defeated.


21 posted on 11/08/2012 12:22:29 PM PST by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Why not just move to the Constitution Party?

The GOP name is so smeared, there’s no hope for it. They’ve done the same thing to the TEA Party (although there was never anything official about it). Most conservatives won’t go Libertarian, but the Constitution Party might be a ready-made alternative.


22 posted on 11/08/2012 12:26:01 PM PST by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

The Conservatives in the Republican party need to have their own primary to put forth 1 Conservative to challenge the Republican moderates - let them split their vote.
***How do we do that? From my home page:

___________________________________________________________________

Here’s how I think primaries should be organized:

My suggestion is basically to hold the first primary in the state that has the highest percentage of GOP votes in the last election, the 2nd primary in the 2nd highest, and so on. 2 primaries a week for 25 weeks, with the last primaries being the suckup-to-the-democrats. And the democrats could easily have their primary schedule the same way, if they wanted.

This way, if a state is 60% republican, there is still incentive for them to get out the vote for 61% republican so they can bump up their state in the primary schedule.

Also: Rotate all the states (even the big ones) through an early schedule so that everyone gets access at some point to the front line.

OR

Let each state bid when they want their primary to take place. The earlier the primary, the fewer the delegates they control according to some logarithmic or steep curve formula.

18 posted on Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:55:08 AM by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1962610/posts?page=18#18

Second thing is the order of the primaries should be determined by the percentage of republicans in the last vote. The higher the %pubbie, the sooner the state appears on the primary schedule, with a mix of big & little states and our staunchest republican states get to go FIRST. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965735/posts?page=862#862

24 posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 8:52:29 PM by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse] http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2332420/posts?page=24#24


23 posted on 11/08/2012 12:27:28 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

After having a conversation with a friend today is it time to replace the Electoral College with direct election of the President?


And we’ll see a whole new level of ballot stuffing.


24 posted on 11/08/2012 12:27:55 PM PST by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Mr. Robert - Republicans don’t need no more steenking leaders for President. We had all kinds this last time. What they need is to raise the abysmal Republican brand name in Congress. With a good four year approval record in Congress, people would give even some mystery candidate the benefit of the doubt.

But if sponsoring legislation that benefits the working middle class, even union, is beyond the smell of their Wall Street noses, then picking another bozo who is for exporting jobs won’t change the results.

You want to win, nominate someone to get the support of Reagan Democrats.


25 posted on 11/08/2012 12:29:16 PM PST by ex-snook (without forgiveness there is no Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

We are going to keep having this problem until they can find a way to keep the Democrats from voting in the Republican primaries.


26 posted on 11/08/2012 12:29:46 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

It’s probably easier to change the republican primary process than to change the constitution & the electoral college system.


27 posted on 11/08/2012 12:30:42 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I agree. We can draw enough of the Republicans, Libertarians, digruntled with the system’ers, non-leftist Democrats —so we don’t win. But at least we run with principle. We aren’t exactly going gang busters with the Republican milquetoast platform.


28 posted on 11/08/2012 12:32:24 PM PST by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: riri

I look at what perot did before he self-destructed.


29 posted on 11/08/2012 12:37:40 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

If this is to be taken seriously, two questions are in order. Which of the 60 million obama voters would have voted for a real conservative? Secondly, why did 3 million GOP voters not vote? If it was that they believed there was no difference between romney and obama then they’re delusional. If it was Romney was not pure enough, then a pox on their houses for delivering 4 more years of budding fascism.


30 posted on 11/08/2012 12:53:37 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

We are going to keep having this problem until they can find a way to keep the Democrats from voting in the Republican primaries.
***I think it goes way beyond that. But at least it would be a start.


31 posted on 11/08/2012 12:54:01 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Romney ran a “Johnny One Note Campaign” Used a poison dart blow gun when he should have used a cannon loaded with grape shot because he had pleanty of stuff he could fill that barrel with.. He failed to hammer away on what will happen when Obama gets returned; The Obama 2013/14 Tax Increases. The impact of Obama’s energy policies...The impact of Supreme Court Appointments.. 18,000 new IRS agents and on and on. Including rampant corruption. Instead we got a sales pitch on executive ability but not the reason why one should toss the old model and buy his.

In addition Rove who I understand was handling the Senate campaign played games and his material
never warned voters that if Obama gets re-elected as well as senate the chances of repealing Obama care ...AND ALL THE TAX INCREASES THAT GO WITH IT WILL NEVER GET REPEALED

Nuts...This loss is inexcuseable


32 posted on 11/08/2012 12:57:00 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("Vengence is mine".....Thus sayeth the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

“Give the mouse a cookie and then he will want a glass of milk”

We as conservatives must stand on principle or we stand for nothing. Liberalism is an all-or-nothing treasonous ideology that subverts our constitution and makes it irrelevant!

When Liberals are the majority it’s... SCREW YOU WE WON!

When Conservatives are the majority it’s... compromise, play nice and eventually cave to everything Liberals want.

Why do conservatives ALWAYS compromise with liberals when the goal of liberalism is 100%!

NO WAY should Conservatives bend to the desires of Liberalism! There is no middle ground! The fight is Liberty vs Tyranny... Individualism vs Collectivism.

The mask is off the Liberals... They are without apology for all to see, Anti-American COMMUNISTS, TYRANTS and SATISTS!

Our United States Constitution and way of life was founded on Judeo-Christian values, grounded in the ideals of Liberty, self destiny and limited government that stays the hell out of our lives and the sovereignty of our States.

Liberalism is the antithesis of our Constitution and its founders... an ideologically treasonous doctrine of tyranny and Godless immorality.

LIBERALISM IS OUR DOMESTIC ENEMY! WE MUST NOT COMPROMISE, GIVE NO QUARTER, TAKE NO PRISONERS!

Spineless House Speaker Boehner MUST BE REPLACED! We need a PAIR as our speaker, not a eunuch!

In 2014 we will flip the Senate and put Odumbo in a deep freeze until 2016!

In 2016 I predict Hillary Clinton will again seek the Democrat nominee for POTUS

In 2016 the new majority party, The Tea Party (RIP GOP), must nominate a true conservative. My choice is Sarah Palin. Run Sarah, run...


33 posted on 11/08/2012 12:58:36 PM PST by Bellagio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

On to practicalities. To start with, the new Republican caucus is going to have to elect the Speaker of the House.

John Boehner is currently 23rd in seniority in the House, so he should not be impossible to replace with a solid conservative. It will be the first test of the Tea Party members to assert themselves.

Then there will be the votes for the chairmen of the House committees. Appropriations, Ways & Means, and Rules are the most powerful assignments, so hopefully will all go to Tea Party conservatives.

The senate will be a lot harder, though many of the solid RINOs have been knocked out, there is still a logjam by seniority, and unlikely that any serious conservative can be minority leader.

Without a hard core conservative to oppose him, Harry Reid will still prevent anything good from happening, demanding the Republicans do what he want or be blamed for “shutting down the government”, yet giving them nothing in return.

The best bet is for the lame duck Republicans in the senate and the house to call Harry Reids wager, and refuse to pass any more continuing resolutions. This will mean over two months of severe pressure on the Democrats.


34 posted on 11/08/2012 1:04:16 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

LET’S GO, I’m ready.


35 posted on 11/08/2012 1:08:30 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
It is certainly worth thinking about with states like California and New York that are consistently Blue at least then your vote would really have weight.

Kalifornia should not have 55 electorial college votes. That is simply insane. People have been leaving the state for 20 years. They must be counting every single illegal to maintain that kind of number.

36 posted on 11/08/2012 1:19:06 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Secondly, why did 3 million GOP voters not vote? If it was that they believed there was no difference between romney and obama then they’re delusional.
***There would be more votes where that came from, from democrats who could see no real difference between the candidates and therefore no reason to give the job to the new guy.

If it was Romney was not pure enough, then a pox on their houses for delivering 4 more years of budding fascism.
***
I would rather have a conservative. This is a conservative website. Berating conservatives because they didn’t vote for a librul is not conservative. It says right in the founder’s statement that we are not beholden to ANY political party; FR is not a GOP website. The GOP let them down. Would you expect blacks to vote for a kkk candidate? Would you go onto blackpower.com and berate them for not voting for someone antithetical to their principles? No, because such a thing is OBVIOUSLY trolling. But coming onto a conservative website and berating conservatives for not voting for their antithetical nonconservative is somehow acceptable. Bowlsheet. It’s trolling.

Are you here to pound down conservatives in the name of the GOP, because some of them didn’t vote for your GOP-elitist snob liberal. FR is not a GOP website. It IS an evangelical, Pro-God Conservative website. That means what you’re doing is trolling. That aintse conservative.

Those people who chose not to vote for your POS candidate had a right to do so, and they are more conservative than you. FR is a conservative website, not a republican website, so you should not be doing that. Would you expect Paulbots to vote against Ron Paul? Or would you go onto a Goodebot website and expect them to vote against Goode? That would be OBVIOUS trolling. Then why do you come onto a conservative website and expect them to vote against their conservative principles? It is OBVIOUS trolling.


37 posted on 11/08/2012 1:25:55 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

Obozo would have still won with a “direct election”...simpler method is to do away with winner-take-all electoral votes for the state. Let each electoral district be counted splitting the state vote.


38 posted on 11/08/2012 2:02:08 PM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

What, again? This is about the 35th time I’ve heard that.

I am done with the GOP!


39 posted on 11/08/2012 2:07:31 PM PST by CodeToad (Padme: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

I’m going to pound anyone ho thought purity was more important than country. As for FR being a conservative site. Too many here think the only conservatives are those who fly Gadsden flags, proudly possess Ruger mini 14s and Colt 1911s, who have a Cross that is not a crucifix, and believe Sarah Palin should be President. I have no problem with people who hold these views, but they don’t get to define what conservative is for the rest of us.


40 posted on 11/08/2012 2:28:32 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

I’m going to pound anyone ho thought purity was more important than country.
******It says right in the founder’s statement that we are not beholden to ANY political party; FR is not a GOP website. So you are not being conservative when you pound conservatives for not voting for what JimRob called a lying, baby-killing, gun-grabbing statist. If you wanna pound conservatives for not voting GOP, go to GOP.com instead of trolling here.

As for FR being a conservative site. Too many here think the only conservatives are those who.... but they don’t get to define what conservative is for the rest of us.

***And in that very same statement, he defines conservatism:
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.


41 posted on 11/08/2012 2:37:07 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

“In the Senate, two good and decent men – Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock – were defeated not because they were pro-life, but because they were inept campaigners. “

WRONG...theyt were inept campaigners because they compelled by the issue of pro-life.
When will we ever learn? More of the same? Think about it!

You can’t be a party of Individual freedom and dictate to women what they can do with their bodies. Our issue is Individual Freedom...with it we can’t go wrong.

To paraphrase...those who do not learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it.


42 posted on 11/08/2012 3:49:58 PM PST by firefox ((Vote Democrat...Its Easier Than Thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

“In the Senate, two good and decent men – Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock – were defeated not because they were pro-life, but because they were inept campaigners. “

WRONG...theyt were inept campaigners because they were compelled by the issue of pro-life.
When will we ever learn? More of the same? Think about it!

You can’t be a party of Individual freedom and dictate to women what they can do with their bodies. Our issue is Individual Freedom...with it we can’t go wrong.

To paraphrase...those who do not learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it.


43 posted on 11/08/2012 3:50:16 PM PST by firefox ((Vote Democrat...Its Easier Than Thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firefox

The most innocent, the unborn child, disagrees with you and is pleading for patriots to stand up for the right to life!

You are a supporter of murdering & slaughtering unborn children!

You are a monster!!!!!


44 posted on 11/08/2012 3:54:02 PM PST by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: firefox

You can’t be a party of Individual freedom and dictate to women what they can do with their bodies.
***I’m fine with that. The problem is that a woman’s body doesn’t have 4 eyes, 4 ears, 2 noses, and 2 mouths.


45 posted on 11/08/2012 3:59:32 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
"Never again” are we going to nominate a big government establishment Republican for President."

Until 2016.


46 posted on 11/08/2012 4:50:54 PM PST by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Please explain how MR and the kenyan "are not alike".

There is no difference between the two. State policy, not talking points. Romney did not tell us ANYTHING that he would do differently from the kenyan. He just thought the Ward and June act would be enough.


47 posted on 11/08/2012 4:56:35 PM PST by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

See...that’s the problem right there...and you prove my point...both you and the other guy represent a segment of the party that wants to impose your morality on others...read your history... friend

...that is why we so often lose the good and noble fight. Have you noticed that you can’t impose your views because you are not in power...a Catch-22...wouldn’t you say? But you would be included under the Big Tent anyway...just not with too big a role.

BTW...you are both doing the work of the Left admirably when you insist upon keeping us out of power.


48 posted on 11/08/2012 5:06:22 PM PST by firefox ((Vote Democrat...Its Easier Than Thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: firefox

See...that’s the problem right there...and you prove my point...both you and the other guy represent a segment of the party that wants to impose your morality on others...read your history... friend
***I think the same right to life & protection that we extend as a society to vulture eggs should be extended to babies, especially those that are viable. If you have a problem with that, why do you log onto FR, which is a pro-life site? What do you hope to accomplish, trying to separate conservatives from their conservative principles?


49 posted on 11/08/2012 5:31:33 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

Oh, yikes. It could happen. But here on FR, if JimRob endorses a pro-choice, gun-grabbing statist turd in 2016, I’ll be leaving FR.


50 posted on 11/08/2012 5:33:37 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson