Some Dems giving up on trying to spin Hillary’s e-mail fiasco, mumbling “who gives a [expletive]?”

Hot Air ^ | March 5, 2015 | Allahpundit

[DaxtonBrown]

“Is it true Jeb Bush had private emails as well? If so, he needs to be called on it”

Foreign enemy countries are not hacking the emails of governors looking for top secret directives.

[hoosiermama]

Reasons to care about her emails

It is not uncommon in illicient groups that an email account is created. More than one person is given the log in information. Emails are never sent but kept in the draft file to be read by the others loggin in. Group can the. Communicate without actually leaving a footprint
It is imperative that Federal Marshalls get hold of that server

With this information in mind Connect these dots:

1. $6 billion missing from state department
2. Multiple email account under various fake names register out of the public eye
3 Unlimited travel through out the world without going thru customs
4. A history of deceit and bending of the rules and ought right lies
5. Large contributions to a family controlled charity by foreign and domestics who have opportunity to gain
6. Questionable relationships with people of questionable background (including daughter’s inlaws , sibling of both Hill and Huma etc)
7. And ......

[Ann Archy]

You stay Classy, Begala.......UGH.....Democrats are VILE.....AND EVIL!

[Ann Archy]

Jeb was NEVER a FEDERAL Employee.....geesh, do some reading.

[snoringbear]

“Is it true Jeb Bush had private emails as well? If so, he needs to be called on it”

Nothing wrong with vetting Jeb’s email, both private and government ones. But, here’s the difference; Jeb had both private and government addresses and presumably used his government address for government communication and his private address for private communication. Conversely, Hillary used her private address for both personal and government communication. In fact, she never even had a government email address. Additionally, she had her own server to manage it in her home. Get the difference?

[Gen.Blather]

I worked for a Fortune 500 company. We were not even allowed to access our private email at work. They were super security conscious. After the Microsoft lawsuit where people at Microsoft had written damaging and incriminating things the system was set to delete all emails after 30 days. If I got anything I considered potentially damaging to me, I printed it and took it home.

But the real problem with personal email accounts is they represented a potential attack vector that let hackers inside our firewall. The question is, what link did she click that opened the entire government system to attack?

[Caipirabob]

Some Dems giving up on trying to spin Hillary’s e-mail fiasco, mumbling “who gives a *?”

[jersey117]

Everyone except Lanny Davis that is.

[Awgie]

This is actually good news. Shrillary is weakened by each successive faux-pas. She is not invincible. The more she is seen and heard, the less she is liked. I prefer a baggage laden scandal ridden Rodham to some shiny new unknown likely Latino shooting star. Lets put the corrupt Clinton machine and matriarchal democrat party on full display.

[Political Junkie Too]

They are throwing any last pretense of following the rule of law under the bus. That's what "who gives a crap" really means. Who cares if we don't follow the law anymore to get what we want?

The problem is, if they don't care, why should we? If they don't care about this law, why should we expect them to care about, say, counting votes?

-PJ

[rollo tomasi]

"They are throwing any last pretense of following the rule of law under the bus."

You need to include economic "laws" as well since "Too big to fail" has become a mantra, whoops, a Repub President pushed that cause.

"They" essentially are/is a non-partisan outfit, especially if "they" whitewash other "they's" high crimes and misdemeanors (Constitutional definition and context not modern day "academic" jurisprudence that intentionally create an abstract definition of HC&M).

[silverleaf]

didn’t Petraeus just plead to a felony for discussing “classified” information on his email with his bimbo? Did “Her Thighness” engage in classified email pillow talk with her bimbette?

enquiring minds want to know

[Mister Da]

I have yet to see anyone on the Left address the fact that she broke the law & should be indicted. That’s because our Rat controlled government wont indict a fellow Rat under ANY circumstances.

Holder/Lynch wont indict HRC because Obama will tell them not to. She knows too much.

Rats are a criminal conspiracy like a street gang. They are all up to their necks in criminality, therefore they cannot rat out each other for fear their own crimes would come to light.

[Aria]

WOW, that is very interesting.

What we’re hearing now could just be the rumbling before the big explosions - if we ever get the truth of these email accounts.

I’ve thought that the Clintons are kind of a ponzi scheme of power - they have to keep their power going to be able to keep a lid on their horrendous corruption. If Hillary doesn’t get the nomination then the jig is up - except I have a hard time seeing the GOPe doing a damn thing about it. But once the nomination is done there goes the new truckloads of money.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Misdemeanor.

[JoeFromSidney]

Is it true Jeb Bush had private emails as well?

I'm no fan of Jeb, but so long as he used private emails for personal matters only, I don't see anything wrong with it. Had he used official emails for personal matters, his opponents would be complaining about that.

[DeFault User]

Does the SOS John Kerrry have a legit email?

It’s horseFace@state.gov

[Verginius Rufus]

Some legal expert on Fox, probably Judge Napolitano, pointed out that one law she may have violated is punished by the person being ineligible for holding federal office.

Of course Obama could come to her rescue in that case with a pardon, but he has no reason to help her unless her downfall hurts him.

The media is doing its best to ignore the White House complicity in this--as if for four years no one at the White House noticed that she wasn't using a state.gov email address.

[Verginius Rufus]

Some legal expert on Fox, probably Judge Napolitano, pointed out that one law she may have violated is punished by the person being ineligible for holding federal office.

Of course Obama could come to her rescue in that case with a pardon, but he has no reason to help her unless her downfall hurts him.

The media is doing its best to ignore the White House complicity in this--as if for four years no one at the White House noticed that she wasn't using a state.gov email address.

[Din Maker]

Love him or loathe him, Mitt Romney was right about one thing: There is a 47% in this nation that will vote Liberal/DemocRAT regardless. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama proved that this 47% will vote the Dem Ticket, even if the Prez is getting oral sex from a girl, near his daughter’s age, in the Oval Office or if the Prez is a Communist Muslim who hates America; they can run and win re-election. How can this be? Well when you start with this 47% already in your column, and then add another 4 percent who claim to be “Independent” but always end up voting for the DemocRATS. Hello..........