Posted on 04/06/2016 3:08:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Thanks for the reply.
I believe taxpayer money should not be spent on abortion, if we wish to subsidize healthcare clinics in poorer areas, there are many alternative, providing more services than PP.
As for shutting down PP would:
>>”result in more illegitimate minority babies, more poverty and more crime.”
Respectfully, that sounds too much like Margaret Sanger and the American Eugenic Movement for me. I really think that is a very poor direction for the argument for PP.
Here’s some articles on alternatives to PP:
http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/28/fact-check-yes-women-can-go-elsewhere-if-planned-parenthood-closes/
Also, concerning the ‘business’ aspect of PP, 86% of it’s non-government revenue are for abortion: http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/86-of-planned-parenthoods-money-comes-from-abortions
Thanks very much for your courteous reply.
They are very scared of Trump !
“stop the abortions but let the women’s health care parts stay running”
PP is adamant that abortions are healthcare. Anything else they might offer is available at other facilities for poor women.
So instead of offering them a cloak for the evil they do, I’d like to hear him say — “we’ll defund them and make sure all those involved in illegal activity (selling of infants parts) serve time in prison”, etc.
So would I but then what to do with the real estate and clinical facilities in areas most would not want to build one?
He’s a GOPe sellout. Therefore he’s lying.
Looking forward to your well-desrved ZOT.
When was the last time you heard of the party establishment actively working to UNDERMINE the top delegate-holder, and top vote-getter, of their OWN party? Rather than, say, praising one of the other candidates?
Looking forward to your well-deserved ZOT.
ZOT? Why?
Because he doesn't agree with me. In the Trumpster world, if one doesn't kiss the Trumpking ring and ignore the fact that Donald Trump is not a conservative, then there must be something wrong with that person and they need to be purged.
See, here is your problem. You are confusing a good ground game with cheating. And I’m not surprised you think that because that is what Trump essentially says and I know Trumpkins mostly just echo their Trumpking.
Cruz has a professionally staffed, polished ground game. Trump, who claims he can run the country, does not.
There is nothing wrong with Cruz’s team solidifying delegate support and using every rule to their advantage. Again, Cruz = good ground game, Trump = terrible ground game.
I guess the same can be said about Rudy’s endorsement if we use your logic.
http://www.ijreview.com/2016/04/579354-rudy-giulani-just-revealed-his-vote-for-president-and-its-sure-to-shake-things-up/
Or by my logic where they wait until a little before the election and after any other election. Hmmmm....which is it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.