Skip to comments.
Lawyer: Terri still in danger
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| October 22, 2003, 5:15 p.m. Eastern
| By Sarah Foster
Posted on 10/22/2003 2:50:08 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-230 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator
To: Catspaw
So you refuse to name any constitutional provision that you think the law violates?
To: The Shootist
Well, the judge is wrong on the first two items, so forgive me if I'm less than confident about his opinions on the latter two.
Besides, I saw him on the Big Story about a week ago, and he was CLUELESS about the case.
The judge is full of himself.
103
posted on
10/22/2003 5:00:21 PM PDT
by
iowamomforfreedom
(Why is it illegal to starve an animal but not a human being?)
To: aristeides
No sense arguing with an ego filled bloatbag like Catspaw.
To: EggsAckley
Michael's behavior
I've been thinking about that. I think Michael is a very controlling person, and may actually be getting something akin to sexual pleasure out of the power he has over Terri. I'll bet his current girlfriend is a very meek person who likes having someone control her life.
From interviews, the night Terri was found unconscious, Michael and her were having a big fight, so bad that one of her friends begged her not to go home after work. I'll bet Michael was already seeing this other woman.
105
posted on
10/22/2003 5:01:26 PM PDT
by
yhwhsman
("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
To: Catspaw
FWIW, I believe that the burden of proof would tend to fall on those making the claim of unconstitutionality (is that a word?).
To: aristeides
So you refuse to name any constitutional provision that you think the law violates?You can freepmail me your real e-mail addy and I'll set up that Paypal account.
107
posted on
10/22/2003 5:02:00 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: FreedomMan_CA
No it couldn't IF YOU EXECUTE A WRITTEN END OF LIFE DIRECTIVE.
To: EggsAckley
Are they just stupid?No, they are liberals who consider Terri a useless eater, and want her off the planet,(it is overcrowded) and gee whiz, is she costing money from the taxpayers? This is the mindset, believe me. They don't think she has a good quality of life, so she should be "offed."
109
posted on
10/22/2003 5:03:03 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: B Knotts
FWIW, I believe that the burden of proof would tend to fall on those making the claim of unconstitutionality (is that a word?).Got a few minutes before the opening pitch.
You're right. The presumption is that the law is constitutional.
110
posted on
10/22/2003 5:03:12 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Bloat filled ego bag, who refuses to back up his own arguments, hiding behind "you gotta pay me for that."
To: The Red Zone
One good measure would be to require all end of life directives that specify removal of nutrition or hydration in case of PVS, or a party with authority to choose such, to be written. Most states do this. We can thank Jim King (fatso) for the fact that Florida doesn't. Requiring a guardian ad litem be appointed by an unrelated party (IIRC, Florida has an office for that purpose) is IMHO more important. Requiring a written statement does little to protect against unscrupulous people, since such statements can easily be forged. Even requiring a notarized statement isn't bullet-proof if a judge is willing to accept as a "notarized statement" something whose seals look they came from a cracker box.
112
posted on
10/22/2003 5:03:18 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: Catspaw
I'm not going to pay you. I'm giving my opinions here without anyone paying me.
And I do take your silence as an admission.
To: aristeides
Batter up!
Well, in a few minutes anyway.
Looks like you're too cheap to pay someone to do legal research.
114
posted on
10/22/2003 5:04:08 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: yhwhsman
And (from what I gather) when she collapsed, he wasn't doing CPR, she was just lying there when the brother arrived.
He is an RT, HE would know better!
115
posted on
10/22/2003 5:04:18 PM PDT
by
najida
(He who is without baggage can cast the first Samsonite.)
To: nickcarraway
This "husband" has got to be taken out of this poor woman's life, the sooner the better! Yet another outrage!
116
posted on
10/22/2003 5:04:18 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
To: nickcarraway
All I really want to know, at the moment is whether the Shindlers are still forbidden from seeing Terri and what is her condition.
It made perfect sense to use an IV to stabalize her but at some point, soon she'll need nutrition as well as hydration.
If this hasn't happened yet it may be because of complications from the latest attempt on her life. She may need some kind of medical intervention that Schiavo is not allowing. If he is still guardian, he can do that.
Felos was talking about how she was in distress and goingto die.
Was this just wishfull thinking on his part or does he know something the outside world does not?
117
posted on
10/22/2003 5:04:28 PM PDT
by
isrul
To: The Red Zone
What's that "NO personal attacks" warning? Guess you've ignored that.
118
posted on
10/22/2003 5:05:16 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
Looks like you're too chicken to back up your own arguments.
To: Catspaw
Go Marlins!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson