Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Arnold losing his superhero status? Planned cuts hit hardest at lower end of economic spectrum
Oakland Tribune ^ | November 30, 2003 | Steve Geissinger

Posted on 11/30/2003 1:05:04 PM PST by John Jorsett

SACRAMENTO -- Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's "miracle" cure for state money woes has turned into a curse in the eyes of the poor, disabled, elderly, motorists, students -- and Democratic lawmakers.

And nowhere is the outcry louder than in the liberal-leaning Bay Area.

The Democrat-dominated Legislature, called back into session by the newly elected governor, is scheduled Monday to begin debating his plan for narrowing California's multibillion-dollar deficit with a bond measure, spending cap and mid-year funding cuts.

Both Democrats and Republicans figure it will be an ugly week politically. But analysts, though hesitant to predict the outcome, say that lawmakers are feeling a great deal of pressure from voters to take definitive action.

A preview of the expected rhetoric came during recent informational legislative hearings.

Donna Arduin, Schwarzenegger's finance director, told lawmakers she blamed the state's fiscal mess on former Democratic Gov. Gray Davis, who was unseated in an unprecedented recall election Oct. 7, and on the Legislature.

"If over the past five years, the previous administration and Legislature had not created or expanded programs the state could not afford, expenditures in the budget would be much lower than they are today," Arduin said.

State Treasurer Phil Angelides, a Democrat who is eyeing a gubernatorial run in 2006, urged legislators to reject Schwarzenegger's proposed $15 billion deficit bond as a costly and risky tactic that will have to be paid off by future generations.

"What's crazy to me, to be honest with you, is why we go through the turmoil of this recall if we start the day after by saying we're going to increase the amount of deficit borrowing, not bring it down?" said Angelides.

Underlying the debate is the continuing desire on the part of Democrats and advocates for the poor to boost taxes in order to blunt spending cuts -- a strategy first rejected by GOP lawmakers and now opposed by Schwarzenegger.

"He's been in office for less than a month and he's already broken his oath to protect and serve all Californians," said Menachem Krajcer of the Applied Research Center, a liberal think tank in Oakland. "He promised no more politics as usual and already he's targeting the poor for budget cuts."

The governor's $15 billion deficit bond is the cornerstone of a fiscal plan that so far includes a proposed constitutional spending cap and mid-year budget reductions that would carry over into the next fiscal year, totaling nearly $4 billion. The plan relies heavily on cuts in social programs.

The spending cap ties the limit to population and personal income. Anything above that amount would go into a reserve to cover shortfalls, make rebates to taxpayers or offset the costs of emergencies declared by the governor.

It also would give the governor power to impose mid-year spending cuts during fiscal downturns, unless the Legislature approves an alternative on a two-thirds vote.

Educators have already attacked the complex measure, saying it would gradually restrict the flow of money to school programs.

If lawmakers ultimately agree this coming week to put the deficit bond and spending cap before voters in March, and to embrace the mid-year cuts, it would still leave a multibillion-dollar fiscal gap for the governor to close in the 2004-05 budget he must pitch to lawmakers in January.

But even the mid-year cuts -- part of the governor's "miracle of Sacramento" fiscal-health plan, as he dubbed it in his inaugural address -- has upset a broad spectrum of advocacy groups.

They accuse Schwarzenegger of targeting low-income Californians to generate money to offset the $4 billion car-tax cut that the governor approved Nov. 17.

Though legislation has been introduced to make up the lost vehicle license fee revenue for local governments, cities and counties are worried.

"Our budget is balanced now but it is precariously balanced because there are so many unknowns," said Susan Muranishi, Alameda County administrator.

Schwarzenegger has proposed $3.8 billion in budget cuts over the next 19 months, including reductions in services to the poor, disabled and elderly. He also has called for cuts in higher education and transportation.

His proposals include:

Ending an array of non-medical services for hundreds of thousands who are developmentally disabled.

Slashing various in-home services the state provides to tens of thousands of elderly residents to keep them out of nursing homes.

Freezing enrollment in several programs, including Healthy Families, which provide health care for children of the working poor.

Trimming 10 percent from the rate at which Medi-Cal, a government-subsidized health care program for the poor, reimburses doctors. That's on top of a 5 percent cut in this year's budget.

Scaling back food stamp eligibility.

Reducing by 5 percent grants to people in CalWORKS, the state's welfare-to-work program.

Moving hundreds of millions of dollars -- some of it permanently -- from traffic congestion relief coffers to help offset the deficit.

Cutting more than $200 million from the University of California and California State University systems.

"At a time when our university system's budget has already been reduced by $304 million, these cuts will be painful," said California State University Chancellor Charles Reed.

But it was the proposed cuts affecting the poor, disabled and elderly that drew the harshest responses.

"This is going to be extraordinarily difficult given that we have been the target of reductions over the last few years," said Chet Hewitt, director of the Alameda County Social Services Agency.

Rocio Smith, a Bay Area advocate for the developmentally disabled, noted that Schwarzenegger had said he was "going to cut waste and fraud."

"Is this waste and fraud?"

Staff writers Michele R. Marcucci, Rebecca Vesely and Michelle Maitre contributed to this report.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
There's nothing more whiney than a California liberal mugged by reality.
1 posted on 11/30/2003 1:05:10 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Here we go.. The guy is actually doing the *only* option of cutting costs, and here comes the 'women/minorities/whoever' hurt worst BS
2 posted on 11/30/2003 1:08:09 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Oh yes there is: A whiney Bay Area California Liberal mugged by reality.
3 posted on 11/30/2003 1:08:11 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"There's nothing more whiney than a California liberal mugged by reality."

===

If you want to read real wining, read this, in case you missed it:

California Governor Schwarzenegger launches right-wing agenda (Socialists are having apoplexy)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1030579/posts
4 posted on 11/30/2003 1:08:41 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett; JohnHuang2
This is really hilarious considering these people write this with a straight face.

I nominate #1 for quote of the day.
5 posted on 11/30/2003 1:09:26 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Arduin is not afraid to point out the truth:

"If over the past five years, the previous administration and Legislature had not created or expanded programs the state could not afford, expenditures in the budget would be much lower than they are today," Arduin said.

6 posted on 11/30/2003 1:09:32 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"And nowhere is the outcry louder than in the liberal-leaning Bay Area."

Anytime the RATS are crying and whining means that someone is doing their job. I'm not a fan of the Gropinator but in this case, I have to salute him just because he's making the liberal leftists weep and gnash their teeth. Salute!
7 posted on 11/30/2003 1:11:54 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Fan-freakin' tastic. Here's three words for ya', Oakland Tribune: GET A JOB.
8 posted on 11/30/2003 1:13:32 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Is he supposed to cut welfare payments to the rich?

And nowhere is the outcry louder than in the liberal-leaning Bay Area.

I doubt if any of these yappers voted for Arnold.

9 posted on 11/30/2003 1:18:30 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Women, children and Oakland Tribune hardest hit.
10 posted on 11/30/2003 1:25:38 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Ahnold, don't you know that you are supposed to use magic to correct all that's wrong in California? You are supposed to straighten out the budgetary woes by further taxing business and "the rich." No one else is supposed to sacrifice at all.
11 posted on 11/30/2003 1:31:33 PM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Ending an array of non-medical services for hundreds of thousands who are developmentally disabled.

I forget the brilliant lawyer's name who fought for a bill to be passed in CA that now FORCES private insurance companies (even HMO's, though the legal fight is trickier) to pay for the above-mentioned services. The bill passed, although many don't know about it.

Here's how you use the bill, whose # I also forget. If your insurance company will pay for services for a brain-injured victim of an accident, and they will, they need to pay for those exact same services for a chronic condition such as autism, cerebral palsy, etc. Maybe someone here has a link to somewhere where this is discussed.

Because of this bill's passing, there should be no need for the state to have to offer those services if the WEALTHIEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD also offer it. Your insurance co will weakly attempt to fight this, but they absolutely have to bow down. This lawyer goes around talking to parents of kids with disabilities telling them how to file and collect.

12 posted on 11/30/2003 1:40:08 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
LOL. The left hates spending cuts more than anything on earth, beside Bush of course!
13 posted on 11/30/2003 1:42:50 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Ending an array of non-medical services for hundreds of thousands who are developmentally disabled.

These monies are thrown year after year after bad ideas that only benefit the esteem of parents.

hurt worst BS...not car buyers for sure. Don't hear them complaining.

14 posted on 11/30/2003 1:46:26 PM PST by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
At a time when our university system's budget has already been reduced by $304 million, these cuts will be painful," said California State University Chancellor Charles Reed.

Yet those cuts will not eliminate "politically correct jobs" such as the one held by a lesbian at Cal State Bakersfield, who "teaches" a course which is nothing more than a rant about inequalities suffered by the marginalized...as perceived by her. I believe the course is titled "Race and Ethnic Relations."

I was told about the course, by a geology student, who made the mistake of taking it. It was on her list of electives for her major.

15 posted on 11/30/2003 1:49:18 PM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek
I know my Dad in Moreno Valley who is about to have to declare bankruptcy (party his fault, but mostly after 9/11 401k blues), is certainly happy to not have to pay 3x car tax.
16 posted on 11/30/2003 1:55:34 PM PST by easonc52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
The liberal press will hate Schwarzenegger no matter what he does. Move to the right, hate him. Move to the left, hate him. Help the poor, hate him. Hurt the poor, hate him. He's better off being his own man because they're not going to accept him anyway. Well, that is until he calls himself a democrat. Then the love fest is on...
17 posted on 11/30/2003 1:56:11 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

ARNOLD MEETS ANOTHER SUPERMAN

18 posted on 11/30/2003 1:59:19 PM PST by TheConservator (To what office do I apply to get my tag line back????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
That is just wrong. The man has no neck!
19 posted on 11/30/2003 2:04:45 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (I shot an arrow in the air. / Where it falls I do not care. / I buy my arrows wholesale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
This man has no neck!


20 posted on 11/30/2003 2:18:35 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson